Mailing-List: contact jackrabbit-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <41A9D235.20607@anyware-tech.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 14:27:17 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric_Damioli?= <cedric.damioli@anyware-tech.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: role of cqfs-3.5.6.jar and cqfs-jackrabbit-3.5.6.jar?
References: <41A91B05.10803@wyona.com>
 <eb7e21904112804517a1ebfbb@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <eb7e21904112804517a1ebfbb@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

David Nuescheler wrote:

>>Just out of curiosity, why does Jackrabbit depend on
>>cqfs-3.5.6.jar  cqfs-jackrabbit-3.5.6.jar
>>    
>>
>the cqfs is a pure java unix-style-filesystem which 
>stores all its files in a single "os-level" file.
>in certain applications (like a content
>repository) it is much faster to use cqfs rather
>than your generic (especially windows) fs.
>
>actually,  jackrabbit does not depend on it,
>it can be referenced through configuration, in
>repository.xml & workspace.xml.
>it is used solely for "cheap & simple" 
>performance improvement.
>
Under which license are these two CQFS jars released ?
Are the sources available somewhere ?
May I use them in a production environment ?

Thanks,
C�dric