jackrabbit-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Apache Wiki <wikidi...@apache.org>
Subject [Jackrabbit Wiki] Update of "Jackrabbit 3 Strategic Plan" by JukkaZitting
Date Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:02:57 GMT
Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jackrabbit Wiki" for change notification.

The "Jackrabbit 3 Strategic Plan" page has been changed by JukkaZitting:

As sent to dev@

New page:
''Draft plan, see the discussion on dev@''

== Situation ==

In Jackrabbit 2.x we have a solid and feature-rich content repository that
works well especially for the needs of traditional web sites and integrated
content management applications. However, the trends in user expectations
(especially for personalized, interactive and collaborative content),
application architectures (distributed, loosely coupled, multi-platform
solutions with lots of data) and hardware design (horizontal rather than
vertical scaling) have rendered some of the original Jackrabbit design
decisions (that date back almost a decade) obsolete and there's no easy
way to incrementally update the design.

This problem has been a know issue for years (the first proposals to address
it date back to 2008), and over the last year we've been actively prototyping
promising ideas to gather more experience on how they work in practice. Now
is the time to move to the next phase where we take that experience and all
the knowledge we've gathered from working with existing Jackrabbit versions
and use it to build a new repository that better matches today's needs.

== Target ==

We want to implement a scalable and performant hierarchical content
repository for use as the foundation of modern world-class web sites and
other demanding content applications. The repository should implement
standards like JCR, WebDAV and CMIS, and be easily accessible from various
platforms, especially from JavaScript clients running in modern browser
environments. The implementation should provide more out-of-the-box
functionality than typical NoSQL databases while achieving comparable
levels of scalability and performance.

By 2013 the new repository should have stabilized its internal architecture
and the implementation should be ready for production use in major deployments
that don't need all the designed features to be ready yet. By 2014 the
repository should have reached comparable level of functionality on all
Jackrabbit 2.x features that we haven't explicitly decided not to support.
It should be possible to migrate existing Jackrabbit applications and
deployments to the new repository implementation with little effort.

== Path ==

Since the goals of the new repository implementation are somewhat different
than the traditional goals of Jackrabbit (i.e. to be "a fully conforming JCR
implementation"), we should organize the implementation work as a new
Jackrabbit subproject with its own identity (i.e. not just "Jackrabbit 3").
This subproject shall have it's own dev@ mailing list, source repository,
issue tracker and release cycle. For now the effort will remain a part of
Jackrabbit and fall within the oversight of the Jackrabbit PMC, but down
the line we may want to branch it off to a separate TLP, possibly through
the Incubator.

The new repository shall be implemented in an open, collaborative fashion
based on the Apache principles. The effort shall be open to all contributors
and actively strive to make it easy for new people to get involved. To
achieve this, the new architecture should be designed to be modular and
easily extensible. Extra care shall also be taken to make the new repository
trivially easy to deploy and use for the most common use cases.

To enable a rapid feedback cycle and to make it easy to track our progress,
we shall adopt a "release early, release often" model of making new releases
at least once a month and maintain a growing set of automated integration and
performance tests to maintain release quality. A key design constraint for
all features is to make them easily testable.

To get started on all this, I propose that we select a name for the new
repository and set up the proposed subproject infrastructure over the next
two weeks. Then we'll target at releasing the first 0.1 version of the new
repository by the end of March. The minimum requirements for that release
are only that it's accessible through HTTP and JCR ("Hello, World!" level OK),
come with a runnable jar for easy deployment, and have a basic integration
test suite that verifies that the release meets the above requirements.
We'll build on from there.

View raw message