From zeta-dev-return-522-apmail-incubator-zeta-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Tue Jan 25 12:16:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-zeta-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 52826 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2011 12:16:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Jan 2011 12:16:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 92481 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2011 12:16:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-zeta-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92386 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2011 12:16:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zeta-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: zeta-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list zeta-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 92377 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jan 2011 12:16:08 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:16:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of maxime.thom@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.41] (HELO mail-ww0-f41.google.com) (74.125.82.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 12:16:03 +0000 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so3994569wwi.0 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 04:15:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=pWTQTOmkIAo/D+uy7BY+gEatjmxQE9fFg6hIjCI5EDA=; b=JA3/YfkzRWmEIzF6tAf/CKgRn5g/K9747+duR0RchB5qpv0PrXHhh6n+Bd3NaYfoT5 vil2S86fjfkOCbmN2CR7cxzGZQOfMrK+AeCvJBZ5ASkV6Qq5AxsMOiReFsqx0PsloYWX 8cpGJNSvRF3oiZ8PkRdGcS8Uqzwalm4J98mv8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=rQgZznm1qrs7crs0mVJUhtM5L3pV2Jj2TGAYicJkHL3Xd8tq7DbbPDSRCWduMIz+26 pax7vvDWfNd3nkuzn46F+heqDc2Ixwj/ZQgSN5HvJtVjJLItjvi1sqlV7wVqwp00aTvD 8dELzU0aQZI5tld1GFKgl5ShUFlbY5Itthvcs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.61.202 with SMTP id w52mr3395569wec.110.1295957742063; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 04:15:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.28.213 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 04:15:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4D3EB176.5010401@schlitt.info> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:15:42 +0100 Message-ID: From: Maxime Thomas To: zeta-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0ce0037adc1298049aaaacee Subject: =?windows-1252?Q?Re=3A_=5Bzeta=2Ddev=5D_Thought_experiment=3A_A_first_release_?= =?windows-1252?Q?=85?= --000e0ce0037adc1298049aaaacee Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2011/1/25 Christian Grobmeier > From incubating perspective i think its pretty good to have a release > even when its "only" a bugfix release. > You can learn more about the process at apache and attract people to > this project. And finally it's one more step to graduation. I think > this will take so long after a first release. > > Best regards, > Christian > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Tobias Schlitt > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > so, now that we have a release process in place, PEAR channel setup > > triggered again and already some contribution approaches, we should > > think some more about a first official release of Zeta. Still, there are > > some things to be discussed beforehand. > > > > Since we don't have that many new features / components, yet, I would be > > in favor of doing a bug fix release as the first step. This allows us to > > give new features / components more time until the summer release, but > > still provide value to our users. What do you think? > > > > If we go for a bug fix release rather soonish, we need to come up with a > > release number. The last eZ Components release was 2009.2.1. A feature > > release right now would be called 2010.2 (second scheduled release in > > 2010). Although we do not release new features, that sounds like the > > release number to go. What do you think? > > > > If we go for a release rather soonish, I would appreciate if some more > > open bugs could be fixed until then, so we should have a small > > development phase beforehand. To make that clear: If we really want to > > go the way for a release, I would expect all people on the list to join > > forces in respect to: > > > > - Running tests > > - Investigating issues > > - Checking docs > > - Providing patches > > - Incorporating patches (for those with commit access) > > > > Maybe we should announce something like a bug-hunt week (or 2), to > > motivate people? > > > > So, what do you all think about this direction? > > > > Regards, > > Toby > > > > -- > > Tobias Schlitt http://schlitt.info GPG Key: 0xC462BC14 > > Want to hire me? Need quality assurance? http://qafoo.com > > eZ Components are Zeta Components now! http://bit.ly/9S7zbn > > > > > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de > I'm in. If you need some test, I can help on Search and Translation. Or other ones if you want. How do you plan the activity for the "motivated" people ? -- Maxime maxime.thomas@wascou.org | www.wascou.org | http://twitter.com/wascou --000e0ce0037adc1298049aaaacee--