incubator-yoko-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: Next Steps for Project Yoko : A Proposal
Date Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:53:15 GMT

On Nov 15, 2007, at 2:43 PM, Lars K├╝hne wrote:

> Hi Matt,
>
> thanks for driving things forward.
>
> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> For now, please review this proposal and post your comments and  
>> input.
>> [...]
>>
>> The proposed division is:
>>
>> yoko-spec-corba - this is the org.omg interface classes.
>> rmi-spec - this is the javax.rmi spec implementation
>> core - This is the actual ORB implementation.
>> rmi-impl - This is the implementation of the RMIIIOP support.
>>
>> These modules are also used by Harmony.
>>
>
> I think the module division is correct, but I wonder if now is the  
> right time for core to try leaving the incubator.
>
> Probably not a lot has changed since last February [1], when we  
> found out that nobody here really has a high level overview over  
> the complete ORB code (please speak up if I misinterpreted that  
> thread). Can we really support all of the core code? Currently it  
> seems we're not even ready to review patches from the user  
> community, like the one in YOKO-413.
>
> My "high level development docs" questions from the  
> "Documentation / Graduation" thread [2] are also still unanswered,  
> and they probably can only be answered by the original authors of  
> the code. Most of those questions are being tracked in JIRA [3].  
> Note that Alan set their Fix Version to "Incubation" when he  
> created those issues, so I guess he agrees that high level  
> development docs are relevant for leaving the incubator.

Lars, we are splitting the project to be housed as sub-projects of  
Geronimo and CXF.  We are not graduating per se.

However, your concerns are still valid and will become the concerns  
of the Geronimo and CXF PMCs.


Regards,
Alan


Mime
View raw message