incubator-yoko-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lars K├╝hne <lakue...@t-online.de>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Project Status
Date Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:14:15 GMT
Daniel Kulp wrote:
> 1) The core orb and related stuff.   
> Basically, "core", "yoko-spec-corba", "rmi-spec", and "rmi-impl".   
> These are definitely the things Geronimo and Harmony are most interested 
> in.   
>
> 2) The "Web Service" binding components.
> The "api", "bindings", "tools", and "maven-plugin" modules.
> These consist mostly of plugins to CXF, tooling around those, etc... to 
> allow the use of the CXF apis (JAX-WS) to communicate with CORBA apps.  
>
> The stuff in #2 actually has no dependency on the stuff in #1.   The 
> binding stuff should work with almost any ORB.   (Kind of evident by the 
> threads from Lukas getting it to work with Jacorg.)   However, #2 is 
> heavily dependent on CXF.   When CXF makes major changes, it tends to 
> break that stuff.    Also, that has caused issues with the release 
> schedules  as it kind of ties to the Yoko releases to CXF releases.
>
>
> So, my question is, would another TLP be interested in BOTH parts or 
> should we look into splitting them?

I'd be OK with that, but does Harmony need an IDL compiler (idlj clone)? 
If so, the IDL preprocessor/parser in "tools" would have to live in both 
worlds somehow...

Lars


Mime
View raw message