incubator-yoko-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nolan, Edell" <Edell.No...@iona.com>
Subject RE: Request for creating the M2 release.
Date Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:18:28 GMT
Hi,

I think this is a better option as from a yoko perspective we would like to have all our modules
stable 
And give a good impression to all our users.  Plus it will also give us time to flesh out
some more of the documentation and allow others to help out here so that we can get it up
to speed with with the code. 

I think March end is reasonable in that we can work out if other tasks need to be done and
put them down to be post the release but for March end we have a stable version with more
comphrensive docs. 

+1, Edell.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mosur Ravi, Balaji [mailto:bravi@iona.com] 
Sent: 13 February 2007 19:25
To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Request for creating the M2 release.

Also, I think the other components of yoko (binding & the tools) can be made stable if
given some time.

How about sometime around March end? Is that a reasonable time frame?

- Balaji

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan D. Cabrera [mailto:list@toolazydogs.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 1:24 AM
To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Request for creating the M2 release.

This reflects my sentiments as well.


Regards,
Alan


On Feb 10, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:

> I agree, it would be excellent to have comprehensive documentation.  
> For now, the software is complete and well tested,
> which is a lot more than I personally expect from 1.0 software.   
> When we do get better documentation, we can quickly release a 1.1.
>
> -dain
>
> On Feb 10, 2007, at 1:29 AM, Lars K├╝hne wrote:
>
>> IMHO what's really missing for a 1.0 final release is the 
>> documentation. I started some of it in the old wiki (http:// 
>> wiki.apache.org/incubator-yoko/OrbConfiguration), but that needs to 
>> be migrated to cwiki or the distribution tar ball.
>>
>> Any chance that IONA would donate some of their docs? That would be 
>> so much easier than trying to figure out the exact meaning of each 
>> configuration option by reading the code.
>>
>> -Lars
>>
>> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>>> I think we should release 1.0 final.  The ORB is totally working now 
>>> and it has been throughly tested by the J2EE 1.4 tck.
>>>
>>> -dain
>>>
>>> On Feb 8, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>
>>>> Geronimo has made great progress on the TCK using Yoko, and we're 
>>>> starting to put things together for 1.2 release.  For the
>>>> 1.2 Beta release Geronimo shipped with an interim snapshot version, 
>>>> but for the final 1.2 release, we'd like to use an actual release 
>>>> version.  Can we get the process started to ship an M2 release?  
>>>> And more importantly, can we get it released in a more timely 
>>>> fashion than was done for the M1 release?
>>>>
>>>> Rick
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>


Mime
View raw message