incubator-yoko-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mosur Ravi, Balaji" <br...@iona.com>
Subject RE: Missing apache license headers
Date Tue, 24 Oct 2006 12:39:54 GMT
Thanks for the response... 

I have another question related to the same file idl.g (grammar file
from antlr).

There is a header portion in that file which we added & which should be
apache licensed but the rest is under the antlr license.

Should I stick in the apache license header & the antlr license in that
file?

*********** Portion that we added ******************* header {
  package org.apache.yoko.tools.processors.idl;
  import java.io.*;
  import java.util.Vector;
  import java.util.Hashtable;
 }
*****************************************************

Antlr license: http://www.antlr.org/license.html (we are using antlr 2
license).

Thanks
Balaji


-----Original Message-----
From: Cliff Schmidt [mailto:cliffschmidt@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 1:59 AM
To: Mosur Ravi, Balaji
Cc: Henri Yandell; legal-discuss@apache.org;
yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Missing apache license headers

And apologies from me on the late response, but will agree with Henri.

The license header should not be placed in files that are not
contributed directly to the ASF by the author/copyright owner/owner's
agent.  We call such files that are not directly submitted to the ASF,
"third-party works".  We should never alter or add anything to the
copyright or licensing statements for such third-party works.

You are right to reference such third-party licenses in the LICENSE
file.  You are only required to reference them in the NOTICE file if
the third-party work requires some form of attribution when the work
is distributed.

HTH.

Cliff

On 10/20/06, Henri Yandell <bayard@apache.org> wrote:
> Apologies that this reply is late - and that I'm never 100% sure on my
answers.
>
> I'm pretty sure you don't need the Apache header in either of those.
> These was some debate as to how the third party licenses should be
> hooked in - do you reference them in your NOTICE file?
>
> Hen
>
> On 10/9/06, Mosur Ravi, Balaji <bravi@iona.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Some files in our distribution do not contain the apache license
header
> > & the yoko team would like to know if it needs to be included or
not...
> >
> > idl.g - This file is from the antlr & is released under a bsd
license.
> > Should we include the apache header in this file?
> >
> > We have the third party licenses in separate files and we reference
them
> > from the main LICENSE file. Do we need the headers in these files?
> >
> > third_party_licenses\antlr-bsd-license.txt
> > third_party_licenses\CDDL-license.txt
> > third_party_licenses\celtix-epl-license.txt
> > third_party_licenses\wsdl4j-cpl-license.txt
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Balaji
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mosur Ravi, Balaji
> > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 9:00 AM
> > To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Missing headers
> >
> > I have fixed most of the headers except for the following:
> >
> > tools\src\main\java\org\apache\yoko\tools\processors\idl\idl.g
> > etc\third_party_licenses\antlr-bsd-license.txt
> > etc\third_party_licenses\CDDL-license.txt
> > etc\third_party_licenses\celtix-epl-license.txt
> > etc\third_party_licenses\wsdl4j-cpl-license.txt
> >
> > Does anyone know if it is ok to include the headers in these files?
> >
> > - Balaji
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mosur Ravi, Balaji
> > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 7:59 AM
> > To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Missing headers
> >
> > No, I am trying to fix them...
> >
> > - Balaji
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nolan, Edell
> > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 5:15 AM
> > To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Missing headers
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Do all files now have the correct header ?
> >
> > thanks, Edell.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and
educational
> > only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
> > constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
> > and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
> > official ASF policies and documents.
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational
> only.  Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not
> constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions
> and policies of the ASF.  See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for
> official ASF policies and documents.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>

Mime
View raw message