incubator-yoko-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel Kulp (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (YOKO-33) RMI/IIOP implementation
Date Sat, 14 Oct 2006 02:49:17 GMT
    [ ] 
Daniel Kulp commented on YOKO-33:

   [[ Old comment, sent by email on Tue, 11 Jul 2006 07:52:41 -0400 ]]

Umm.... should a jira issue be marked closed if there are no unit tests?   
Without tests, how do you know the jira is really fixed/closed?

At the very least, a new jira issue should be opened to track the fact that 
tests are completely missing.   However, I would say the original jira issue 
remains open until test coverage is "satisfactory".  (definition open to 
interpretation)    Basically, add a comment saying "source patch applied, 
unit tests required" or similar.


J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194   F:781-902-8001

> RMI/IIOP implementation
> -----------------------
>                 Key: YOKO-33
>                 URL:
>             Project: Yoko - CORBA Server
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Kresten Krab Thorup
>         Assigned To: Anders Hessellund Jensen
>         Attachments: trifork-rmiiiop.tgz
> The attached tgz includes Triforks rmi/iiop implementation, which may be used as a starting
point for the Yoko projects's implementation hereof.  The code doesn't compile as it is ripped
right out of the Trifork T4 application server.  (follow up email coming up)

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
For more information on JIRA, see:


View raw message