incubator-yoko-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petre...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Location of javax.rmi package
Date Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:50:46 GMT
As far as I remember javax.rmi does not use any 1.5 specific features.
I'm not sure about Yoko rmi implementation but I think it should be
1.4 compatible too.

If so it can be compiled by 1.4 to let bigger number of programs to use it.

SY, Alexey

2006/9/14, Mosur Ravi, Balaji <bravi@iona.com>:
> Hi,
>
> Does this package need to be compiled with java 1.4 or 1.5?
>
> Right now it is being compiled using 1.5...
>
> - Balaji
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 2:23 PM
> To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org; geir@pobox.com
> Subject: Re: Location of javax.rmi package
>
> Guys,
>
> I've created javax.rmi implementation.
> You can check it at YOKO-102 [1]
>
> SY, Alexey
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YOKO-102
>
> 2006/9/12, Alexey Petrenko <alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com>:
> > Anders,
> >
> > Is there any updates in this topic? Have you started work on these
> classes?
> > I have a time to work on this now and can do this task.
> >
> > As far as I understood we agreed to include these classes into Yoko in
> > separate jar. In the same jar with rmi implementations. Right?
> >
> > SY, Alexey
> >
> > 2006/8/16, Geir Magnusson Jr <geir@pobox.com>:
> > >
> > >
> > > Mosur Ravi, Balaji wrote:
> > > > I am a bit confused... Again, are we talking about overriding just
> the
> > > > javax.rmi.CORBA implementation of the JRE with our own
> implementation?
> > >
> > > Well, the problem is that you don't need it, we do (Harmony).  So I
> > > agree, a separate jar would be better.
> > >
> > > geir
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Then the users of Yoko, can either choose to use the
> java.endorsed.dirs
> > > > option or the property javax.rmi.CORBA.PortableRemoteObjectClass
> > > > whichever makes sense...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > For clarity I would think of putting the implementation in a
> separate
> > > > jar & not in yoko-spec-corba.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Balaji
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 3:19 AM
> > > > To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org; ahj@trifork.com
> > > > Subject: Re: Location of javax.rmi package
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > So that's what I'm talking about...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > User adds CORBA implementation and receives new implementations of
> > > >
> > > > javax.rmi with it. Which overrides javax.rmi from the JRE.
> > > >
> > > > And this can mislead people...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > SY, Alxey
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2006/8/16, Anders Hessellund Jensen <ahj@trifork.com>:
> > > >
> > > >>> Separate jar for javax.rmi?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> I thought about putting it into the yoko-spec-corba jar along
> with the
> > > >
> > > >> org.omg classes.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Alexey A. Petrenko
> > Intel Middleware Products Division
> >
>
>
> --
> Alexey A. Petrenko
> Intel Middleware Products Division
>
>


-- 
Alexey A. Petrenko
Intel Middleware Products Division

Mime
View raw message