incubator-yoko-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Cliff Schmidt" <cliffschm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Our milestone release
Date Tue, 08 Aug 2006 10:48:30 GMT
Here's a link to the copyright and license header policy with FAQ.
Note that the URL might change soon (which is why I haven't sent it
out yet, since there's still discussion of the appopriate URL).

http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html

Cliff

On 8/8/06, Nolan, Edell <Edell.Nolan@iona.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I seen this email posted elsewhere - not sure if this effects what we
> have done for the copyrights - Cliff can you let us know what the
> current status is as regards the copyrights etc.
>
> BTW the discussion is taking place on legal-discuss@apache.org
>
> -dain
>
> On Aug 6, 2006, at 5:21 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> > Hi Dave,
> > The current deadline for the new policy is for releases distributed
> > after Sept 1. See http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html.
> > Some people are questioning that deadline. However, I'd guess that
> > 1.1.1 will be our last release under existing policy...
> >
> > --kevan
> >
> > On Aug 5, 2006, at 11:19 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> >
> >> Reading some more mails on the maven list, this change has apparently
>
> >> been postponed.... but we should no doubt watch out for it.
> >>
> >> thanks
> >> david jencks
> >>
> >> On Aug 5, 2006, at 8:13 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> >>
> >>> I've seen discussion about this new policy on several other apache
> >>> lists but AFAICT I did not receive any direct notice of the new
> >>> policy and AFAICT our source files do not yet have the new header.
> >>> Did any other committers get notice of this?  Don't we have to fix
> >>> the source for 1.1.1 before releasing it?
> >>>
> >>> thanks
> >>> david jencks
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Begin forwarded message:
> >>>
> >>>> From: Reinhard Poetz <reinhard@apache.org>
> >>>> Date: July 31, 2006 11:51:25 PM PDT
> >>>> To: dev@maven.apache.org
> >>>> Subject: LICENSE and NOTICE in jar artifacts (was: New copyright
> >>>> header policy)
> >>>> Reply-To: "Maven Developers List" <dev@maven.apache.org>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> According to the two mails below from legal@apache, starting with
> >>>> today a PMC isn't allowed to release an artifact if the sources
> >>>> don't cover the new copyright header policy (second mail).
> >>>> Additionally we need to add LICENSE and NOTICE files inside jars
> >>>> too (first mail).
> >>>>
> >>>> Has the maven-jar-plugin been adapted to meet this requirement or
> >>>> is there some simple way to achieve the same result?
> >>>>
> >>>> Reinhard
> >>>>
> >>>> Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> >>>>> On Jun 2, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> >>>>>> What would be the policy for jar files that can be distributed
> >>>>>> individually through the Apache repository? do all of them need
> >>>>>> to have the LICENSE and NOTICE files inside the jar?
> >>>>> Yes -- if they are the result of work created at the ASF (not
> >>>>> third-party works, which should just be left as they were found)
> >>>>
> >>>>                                  - o -
> >>>>
> >>>> On 6/2/06, Cliff Schmidt <cliffs@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>> > During the last ASF Board meeting, a resolution was passed to
> >>>> require
> >>>> > a different licensing header in source files plus requirements
> >>>> for
> >>>> > copyright notices.  PMCs are not required to make any changes
> >>>> to past
> >>>> > releases, but must apply these new rules to all distributions
> >>>> > released on or after August 1, 2006.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Before I send this out to committers@, I thought I'd start by
> >>>> sending
> >>>> > it here to collect and answer any FAQ-type questions.  So,
> >>>> here's the
> >>>> > new policy; hit me with any questions you have.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Thanks,
> >>>> > Cliff
> >>>> >
> >>>> > --- New copyright notice and source header policy ---
> >>>> >
> >>>> > A. THIRD-PARTY COPYRIGHT NOTICES AND LICENSES
> >>>> >    0. The term "third-party work" refers to a work not submitted
> >>>> > directly to the ASF by the copyright owner or owner's agent.
> >>>> >    1. Do not modify or remove any copyright notices or licenses
> >>>> > within third-party works.
> >>>> >    2. Do not add the standard Apache License header to the top
> >>>> of any
> >>>> > third-party source files.
> >>>> >    3. Minor modifications/additions to third-party source files
> >>>> > should typically be licensed under the same terms as the rest
> >>>> of the
> >>>> > source for convenience.
> >>>> >    4. Major modifications/additions to third-party should be
> >>>> dealt
> >>>> > with on a case-by-case basis by the PMC.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > B. SOURCE FILE HEADERS
> >>>> >    0. This section refers only to works submitted directly to
> >>>> the ASF
> >>>> > by the copyright owner or owner's agent.
> >>>> >    1. If the source file is submitted with a copyright notice
> >>>> > included in it, the copyright owner (or owner's agent) must
> >>>> either:
> >>>> >      a. remove such notices, or
> >>>> >      b. move them to the NOTICE file associated with each
> >>>> applicable
> >>>> > project release, or
> >>>> >      c.  provide written permission for the ASF to make such
> >>>> removal
> >>>> > or relocation of the notices.
> >>>> >    2. Each source file should include the following license
> >>>> header --
> >>>> > note that there should be no copyright notice in the header:
> >>>> >
> >>>> >             Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
> >>>> under one
> >>>> >             or more contributor license agreements.  See the
> >>>> NOTICE file
> >>>> >             distributed with this work for additional information
> >>>> >             regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses
> >>>> this file
> >>>> >             to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
> >>>> >             "License"); you may not use this file except in
> >>>> compliance
> >>>> >             with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the
> >>>> License at
> >>>> >
> >>>> >               http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> >>>> >
> >>>> >             Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in
> >>>> writing,
> >>>> >             software distributed under the License is
> >>>> distributed on an
> >>>> >             "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF
> >>>> ANY
> >>>> >             KIND, either express or implied.  See the License
> >>>> for the
> >>>> >             specific language governing permissions and
> >>>> limitations
> >>>> >             under the License.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > C.  NOTICE FILE
> >>>> >    0. Every Apache distribution should include a NOTICE file
> >>>> in the
> >>>> > top directory, along with the standard LICENSE file
> >>>> >    1. The top of each NOTICE file should include the following
> >>>> text,
> >>>> > suitably modified to reflect the product name and year(s) of
> >>>> > distribution of the current and past versions of the product:
> >>>> >
> >>>> >            Apache [PRODUCT_NAME]
> >>>> >            Copyright [yyyy] The Apache Software Foundation
> >>>> >
> >>>> >            This product includes software developed at
> >>>> >            The Apache Software Foundation (http://
> >>>> www.apache.org/).
> >>>> >
> >>>> >    2. The remainder of the NOTICE file is to be used for required
>
> >>>> > third-party notices.  The NOTICE file may also include copyright
> >>>> > notices moved from source files submitted to the ASF (see B.1.).
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ___________________________________________________________
> >>>> Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://
> >>>> messenger.yahoo.de
> >>>>
> >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> --
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org For
> >>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adinarayana Sakala [mailto:adisakala@gmail.com]
> Sent: 08 August 2006 05:33
> To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Our milestone release
>
> > Are there any more outstanding tasks that need to be completed before
> > we call a vote on this...?
> I think you should call for a vote.
>
> Does anybody know if it is required for release packages to get reviewed
> by Apache Legal before we vote on it or will it happen during the
> incubator PMC vote?
>
> -Adi
>
> On 8/7/06, Mosur Ravi, Balaji <bravi@iona.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > It looks like other projects are starting to look at using yoko for
> > their projects... So we should now try to release our first milestone
> > and make it easier for them... Are there any more outstanding tasks
> > that need to be completed before we call a vote on this...?
> >
> >
> >
> > I have uploaded the distribution in my home directory (/home/bravi)...
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > Balaji
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Adi Sakala
> http://celtix.objectweb.org
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message