incubator-yoko-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geir Magnusson Jr <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: Location of javax.rmi package
Date Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:14:37 GMT


Mosur Ravi, Balaji wrote:
> I am a bit confused... Again, are we talking about overriding just the
> javax.rmi.CORBA implementation of the JRE with our own implementation?

Well, the problem is that you don't need it, we do (Harmony).  So I
agree, a separate jar would be better.

geir

> 
>  
> 
> Then the users of Yoko, can either choose to use the java.endorsed.dirs
> option or the property javax.rmi.CORBA.PortableRemoteObjectClass
> whichever makes sense...
> 
>  
> 
> For clarity I would think of putting the implementation in a separate
> jar & not in yoko-spec-corba.
> 
>  
> 
> - Balaji
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 3:19 AM
> To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org; ahj@trifork.com
> Subject: Re: Location of javax.rmi package
> 
>  
> 
> So that's what I'm talking about...
> 
>  
> 
> User adds CORBA implementation and receives new implementations of
> 
> javax.rmi with it. Which overrides javax.rmi from the JRE.
> 
> And this can mislead people...
> 
>  
> 
> SY, Alxey
> 
>  
> 
> 2006/8/16, Anders Hessellund Jensen <ahj@trifork.com>:
> 
>>> Separate jar for javax.rmi?
> 
> 
>> I thought about putting it into the yoko-spec-corba jar along with the
> 
>> org.omg classes.
> 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 

Mime
View raw message