incubator-yoko-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petre...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Java 1.5 compatibility...
Date Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:40:50 GMT
I agree that separating API and Yoko specific packages is good.
Such API bundle will be useful not in Geronimo only but in other
projetcs too... Harmony, for example :)

SY, Alexey

2006/7/28, Anders Hessellund Jensen <ahj@trifork.com>:
> Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> > yoko-spec-corba looks like a subset of yoko-core... At least for
> > package names...
>
> > I did not quite understand what was the reason to duplicate the code.
> > And do you synchronize it or not?
>
> The intention was to separate the org.omg. classes (the API) from the
> yoko-specific classes. I wanted to remove the classes in org.omg.
> classes from the core project, but I was unable to set up the
> dependencies in maven correctly, since maven has no support for the
> endorsed standards override mechanism, which is why the yoko-spec-corba
> module is currently unused.
>
> I think it is important to separate the org.omg. classes from the rest
> of the Yoko project. The people from Geronimo have expressed interest in
> this. It is important that Geronimo modules which depend on corba
> functionality can depend on the API only, and not a specific ORB
> implementation.
>
> We really need a solution for this problem. I would have no problem with
> - as a temporary solution - to remove the yoko-spec-corba module and
> have the org.omg. classes in core until the maven issues can be resolved.
>
> But i really think the spec  should be separated from Yoko eventually -
> as soon as possible, in fact.
>
> Regards,
> Anders
>


-- 
Alexey A. Petrenko
Intel Middleware Products Division

Mime
View raw message