incubator-yoko-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick McGuire <>
Subject Re: Making sense of the org.omg.* class levels.
Date Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:21:00 GMT
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Rick McGuire wrote:
>> I'm working on a transient NameService implementation that can be 
>> used by Geronimo, and I suddenly find myself seriously confused on 
>> what version of the org.omg.* classes we should be using, 
>> particularly when compared with the Geronimo spec versions.  For 
>> example, in the Geronimo 3.0 spec tree, there is are org.omg.CORBA, 
>> org.omg.CORBA_2_3, and org.omg.CORBA_2_5.  In the Yoko tree, we have 
>> CORBA, CORBA_2_3 and CORBA_2_4.  Also, there's no CosNaming package 
>> in the Yoko tree, which I'll need to write the NamingService.  Also, 
>> unfortunately, I would really like to be able to use the CORBA_2_5 
>> version of ORB, since that adds the register_initial_reference method 
>> to the public interface.
>> What should we be using here?  Would it be appropriate to pull in the 
>> Geronimo CORBA 3.0 tree and build the classes that way?
>> Rick
> Rick,
> I don't see a Jira issue for this piece of work.
> I'm really worried that people are doing work on things and not 
> discussing it first on this list.  If we file Jiras it will be a 
> simple way of driving a stake in the ground and announcing to the 
> community what you're doing.  It will also provide a way for people to 
> submit comments and for us to track your commits related to that work.
> Thoughts?
Oops, having a senior moment here....I thought I HAD already opened a 
JIRA for this.  I agree with everything you've said above.


> Regards,
> Alan

View raw message