incubator-yoko-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sakala, Adinarayana" <ASAK...@iona.com>
Subject RE: Yoko version... (WAS: RE: Steps for hitting a Milestone release (WAS: RE: Milestone release))
Date Thu, 15 Jun 2006 19:38:50 GMT
> I've created 1.0-incubating-M1.
What do you mean by this?

> I guess we should update the POMS.
I will take care of it.

thanks,
adi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan D. Cabrera [mailto:list@toolazydogs.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 2:47 PM
> To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Yoko version... (WAS: RE: Steps for hitting a Milestone
> release (WAS: RE: Milestone release))
> 
> 
> I've created 1.0-incubating-M1.  I guess we should update the POMS.
> 
> P.S. I'm assuming that everyone is cool w/ this.  It's 
> trivial to undo.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Alan
> 
> 
> 
> Sakala, Adinarayana wrote:
> > Here is the official answer from maven team on the topic of version.
> > 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/200606.mbox
> /%3cPine.LNX.4.58.0606140259520.4265@fire.homenet.neonics.com%3e
> >
> > Essentially David's suggestion is right. 
> >   1.0-incubating-M1 < 1.0 < 1.0-1
> >
> > So, since now Alan is sold on :) having the word "incubating",
> > Shall we adopt the version being "1.0-incubating-M1"?
> >
> > thanks,
> > Adi
> >
> >   
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Sakala, Adinarayana 
> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:29 AM
> >> To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Subject: RE: Yoko version... (WAS: RE: Steps for hitting a 
> Milestone
> >> release (WAS: RE: Milestone release))
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks David.
> >>     
> >>> I'm not sure I'm entirely accurate here, however I'm sure 
> >>>       
> >> that x.y.z- 
> >>     
> >>> incubating is before x.y.z
> >>>
> >>>   This is discussed in "Better builds with maven" page 59.
> >>>       
> >> What is the best way to confirm this?
> >> David/somebody want to confirm it with Maven dev team?
> >>
> >> I really hope this is true because, we are definetley not at 
> >> 0.1 release, In my opinion Yoko is very close to 1.0 because 
> >> we have a real working and stable CORBA Server.
> >>
> >> Waiting to confirm from Maven team, Lets see if we all can 
> >> agree to version as,
> >>   "1.0-M1"
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> adi
> >>
> >>     
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: David Jencks [mailto:david_jencks@yahoo.com]
> >>> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 9:11 PM
> >>> To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: Yoko version... (WAS: RE: Steps for hitting 
> a Milestone
> >>> release (WAS: RE: Milestone release))
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Jun 12, 2006, at 5:48 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >>>
> >>>       
> >>>> David,
> >>>>
> >>>>         
> >>>>> I assume this is maven2 we're talking about...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> My understanding is that
> >>>>>
> >>>>> x.y.z-alphabetic
> >>>>> precedes
> >>>>> x.y.z
> >>>>> which precedes
> >>>>> x.y.z-numeric
> >>>>>           
> >>>> Is this documented someplace?
> >>>>         
> >>> I'm not sure I'm entirely accurate here, however I'm sure 
> >>>       
> >> that x.y.z- 
> >>     
> >>> incubating is before x.y.z
> >>>
> >>>   This is discussed in "Better builds with maven" page 59.
> >>>
> >>> thanks
> >>> david jencks
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>       
> >>>>   I went thought most of the "mini guides" on
> >>>> the maven website and didn't see anything which is why I 
> >>>>         
> >>> raised the  
> >>>       
> >>>> concern.
> >>>> I'd rather not rely on undocumented behavior that just 
> >>>>         
> >> happens to  
> >>     
> >>>> do what we
> >>>> want.   Then again, much of maven's behavior falls into that  
> >>>> category.  :-(
> >>>> (honestly, I LIKE maven, but sometimes, all you can do is just  
> >>>> shake your
> >>>> head and wonder.....)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>         
> >>>>> Thus 1.0-SNAPSHOT is before 1.0, and build 1 (1.0-1) is 
> >>>>>           
> >> after 1.0.
> >>     
> >>>> SNAPSHOT's are special cases as you need to explicitly enable  
> >>>> them.  My
> >>>> understanding is the -SNAPHOST tail is treated completely 
> >>>>         
> >> special  
> >>     
> >>>> so that
> >>>> they can be completely turned off, the release plugin 
> can "flag"  
> >>>> them, etc...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>         
> >>>>>>> My suggestion is to just play it safe and make sure the
first
> >>>>>>> "#.#" is there
> >>>>>>> and is incremented in some fassion for each release.
> >>>>>>>               
> >>>>>> So, its sounds like going with your suggestion is a 
> better idea.
> >>>>>> i.e 0.1-incubating-M1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Any objections to this change?
> >>>>>>             
> >>>>> If this contains pretty much the intended feature set for 
> >>>>>           
> >>> 1.0, I'd go
> >>>       
> >>>>> with 1.0-incubating-M1.  If there's enormous missing 
> >>>>>           
> >> functionality,
> >>     
> >>>>> 0.1-incubating-M1 seems more appropriate.  I was under the 
> >>>>>           
> >>> impression
> >>>       
> >>>>> that the former was more accurate :-)
> >>>>>           
> >>>> Ok, how about 0.9-incubating-M1?  :-)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> J. Daniel Kulp
> >>>> Principal Engineer
> >>>> IONA
> >>>> P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194   F:781-902-8001
> >>>> daniel.kulp@iona.com
> >>>>         
> >>>       
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message