incubator-yoko-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <>
Subject Transport Security [was: Re: Full working orb?]
Date Sun, 09 Apr 2006 00:28:25 GMT
Maybe we can get IONA and IBM to agree here :)  I can attempt to push  
it through IBM (and maybe Andy can try BEA).

How does everyone want the transport level features to work in Yoko?


On Apr 8, 2006, at 6:36 AM, Andy Piper wrote:

> PI doesn't support the transport level features required (IBM  
> proposed it but it got shot down by Iona if I remember :)) for the  
> TLS part of CSIv2, I assume that G has something proprietary to  
> make this workable however.
> andy
> At 05:52 PM 4/6/2006, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> Sakala, Adinarayana wrote, On 4/6/2006 9:13 AM:
>>> Hi Dain,
>>> I think its too early to start integrating yoko into geronimo.
>>> My feeling would be to give couple more weeks so that yoko system  
>>> becomes stable. we literally just got started ;)
>>> Might be a good thing to look in the timeframe of ApacheCon, what  
>>> do you think?
>>> That said, I dont belive yoko has support for CSIv2 yet.
>>> Is that required for Geronimo integration?
>> Yep.  It's required by the EJB interop.  I think that since we  
>> have portable interceptors, integration with some of the code I  
>> have will be a "breeze".
>> Regards,
>> Alan
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> _
> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may  
> contain
> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and   
> affiliated
> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted   
> and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the  
> individual
> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended  
> recipient,
> and have received this message in error, please immediately return  
> this
> by email and then delete it.

View raw message