incubator-yoko-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dain Sundstrom <d...@iq80.com>
Subject Re: Resolution on JDK Layering - Alan's Proposal? (WAS:RE: coding standard and logging )
Date Wed, 19 Apr 2006 17:32:35 GMT
What exactly will be in the tools and bindings modules?  In geronimo  
a most of our tools are exposed via the web console running in a 1.4  
vm.  Does this mean we will not be able to generate IDL on the fly in  
a 1.4 vm?

-dain

On Apr 19, 2006, at 10:07 AM, Sakala, Adinarayana wrote:

> Where do we stand on this JDK issue?
> I think i like Alan's layering proposal for the short term.
> Just to be clear,
>
>   trunk\core - compiles with JDK 1.4 and runs on both JDK 1.4 and 1.5
>
> Everything else i.e,
>
>   trunk\tools
>   trunk\bindings
>   ... compiles with JDK 1.5 and runs on JDK 1.5
>
> I think we should be able to setup maven build system to handle  
> this automatically.
>
> In longer term, we could look at how we can introduce cool JDK 1.5  
> usage into core as well.
>
> If nobody complains i suggest we implement this approach.
>
> thanks,
> Adi Sakala
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Alan D. Cabrera [mailto:list@toolazydogs.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 6:12 PM
>> To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: coding standard and logging
>>
>>
>> Lars K├╝hne wrote, On 4/6/2006 2:16 PM:
>>
>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sakala, Adinarayana wrote, On 4/6/2006 12:15 PM:
>>>>
>>>>> Alan,
>>>>>
>>>>> when does geronimo move to JDK 1.5?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Geronimo is not moving to JDK15.  It will start supporting
>> JDK15 in
>>>> addition to JDK14.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Pardon my ignorance, but won't J2EE 5 require running on a 1.5 JVM?
>>> From JSR 244:
>>>
>>>    Java EE 5 is the Enterprise Edition of version 5 of the Java
>>>    platform, and thus will be built on J2SE 5.0.
>>>
>>>
>>> How will you implement the annotation features in J2EE 5 on
>> a 1.4 JVM?
>>
>>
>> You can layer the architecture to accommodate this.  This is
>> what I am
>> proposing for Yoko as well.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>>
>>
>>


Mime
View raw message