incubator-yoko-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Prasad Kosuru" <prasadarao.kos...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Resolution on JDK Layering - Alan's Proposal? (WAS:RE: coding standard and logging )
Date Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:45:37 GMT
I think this is better approach, because new development work could benefit
from jdk1.5 features, on the other hand we could use orb functionallity
built using jdk1.4 and it would work with jdk1.5 as well.

+1

Regards,
Prasad

On 4/19/06, Sakala, Adinarayana <ASAKALA@iona.com> wrote:
>
> Where do we stand on this JDK issue?
> I think i like Alan's layering proposal for the short term.
> Just to be clear,
>
>   trunk\core - compiles with JDK 1.4 and runs on both JDK 1.4 and 1.5
>
> Everything else i.e,
>
>   trunk\tools
>   trunk\bindings
>   ... compiles with JDK 1.5 and runs on JDK 1.5
>
> I think we should be able to setup maven build system to handle this
> automatically.
>
> In longer term, we could look at how we can introduce cool JDK 1.5 usage
> into core as well.
>
> If nobody complains i suggest we implement this approach.
>
> thanks,
> Adi Sakala
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alan D. Cabrera [mailto:list@toolazydogs.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 6:12 PM
> > To: yoko-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: coding standard and logging
> >
> >
> > Lars Kühne wrote, On 4/6/2006 2:16 PM:
> >
> > > Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> > >
> > >> Sakala, Adinarayana wrote, On 4/6/2006 12:15 PM:
> > >>
> > >>> Alan,
> > >>>
> > >>> when does geronimo move to JDK 1.5?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Geronimo is not moving to JDK15.  It will start supporting
> > JDK15 in
> > >> addition to JDK14.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Pardon my ignorance, but won't J2EE 5 require running on a 1.5 JVM?
> > > From JSR 244:
> > >
> > >    Java EE 5 is the Enterprise Edition of version 5 of the Java
> > >    platform, and thus will be built on J2SE 5.0.
> > >
> > >
> > > How will you implement the annotation features in J2EE 5 on
> > a 1.4 JVM?
> >
> >
> > You can layer the architecture to accommodate this.  This is
> > what I am
> > proposing for Yoko as well.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message