incubator-yoko-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan D. Cabrera" <l...@toolazydogs.com>
Subject Re: Transport Security [was: Re: Full working orb?]
Date Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:40:11 GMT
Agreed.  There's no reason to postpone our work to involve the JCP for 
something that, on a good day, only 3 people on the planet care about.


Regards,
Alan

Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> If we can get an agreement here and implement it as the defacto 
> standard, I think we will all be better off.
>
> -dain
>
> On Apr 19, 2006, at 2:56 AM, Andy Piper wrote:
>
>> At 10:18 AM 4/14/2006,
>>> Maybe we can get IONA and IBM to agree here :)  I can attempt to 
>>> push it through IBM (and maybe Andy can try BEA).
>>
>> My personal opinion is that this should go through the JCP. The 
>> reason the original proposal failed was because it was defined in IDL 
>> in order to be supportable on any ORB (i.e. non-Java) and there were 
>> issues with the way this worked. I think this is really a Java 
>> specific problem and therefore should be solved in a java-specific 
>> way. Unfortunately I think protocol dictates that this go through the 
>> OMG ....
>>
>> Another alternative is to sneak it in via the Java-IDL spec which 
>> already has Java-specific APIs. I suspect this would also be a breach 
>> of protocol :(
>>
>> andy
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
>> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
>> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
>> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
>> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
>> and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
>> by email and then delete it.
>


Mime
View raw message