incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pablo Ojanguren <pablo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Stuff and mocking things
Date Mon, 28 Nov 2016 16:47:15 GMT
Good job Evan.
Regarding with gwt module inheritance... I found some problems with new gwt
version and path expresions in gwt modules. Does it ring you a bell?

2016-11-28 16:56 GMT+01:00 Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>:

> Great! I was sick for a few days, hopefully I ll get back to fixing the
> tests soon.
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 5:42 PM Evan Hughes <ehugh1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I have finished changing everything over to mockito, I also managed to
> get
> > the gwt tests working now. Some of the gwt tests are working, some are
> not,
> > seems to mostly be missing inherited modules.
> >
> > On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 at 22:50 Evan Hughes <ehugh1@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Howd you end up going yuri, unfortunately the life/work balance got me
> > > this weekend so ill have to push it back till monday.
> > >
> > > On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 at 23:13 Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I ll start with SchedulerTest.java
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:13 PM Evan Hughes <ehugh1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > incubator-wave/wave/src/test/java/org/waveprotocol/wave/
> client/scheduler/IdempotentSchedulerTest.java
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > incubator-wave/wave/src/test/java/org/waveprotocol/wave/
> client/scheduler/knobs/ControllerTest.java
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > incubator-wave/wave/src/test/java/org/waveprotocol/wave/
> client/scheduler/testing/FakeTimerServiceTest.java
> > > >
> > > > seems to only be 3, I have updated on that branch the version of
> > mockito
> > > > which had its own things to fix but they should be good now. I cant
> > touch
> > > > things again till this time tomorrow so feel free to choose which
> ones
> > > you
> > > > want.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 at 22:04 Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Sure, I guess I can help with this. How we coordinate to ensure we
> > > don't
> > > > > work on the same tests? Would you like to send me a few test class
> > > names
> > > > to
> > > > > work on?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 1:59 PM Evan Hughes <
> wisebaldone@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > We shouldn't have 2 mocking libraries and mockito is the superior
> > one
> > > > > since
> > > > > > its continually maintained. We can even do fancy things like
this
> > > > > > http://google.github.io/gwtmockito/ in the future to aid in
> having
> > > the
> > > > > gwt
> > > > > > js library well tested.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 at 21:50 Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Great news, thanks Evan!
> > > > > > > Regarding mockito - what are the issues?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 1:20 PM Evan Hughes <
> > > wisebaldone@apache.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hey all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Been working on removing old dependencies and updating
> > > dependencies
> > > > > as
> > > > > > > can
> > > > > > > > be seen here
> > > > > > > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-wave/tree/fix/dependendices-2016
> > > > > .
> > > > > > > It
> > > > > > > > seems we have to mocking lib's in use, if anyone is
good with
> > > > mockito
> > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > you kindly help in transiting the tests with the other
> mocking
> > > > > library
> > > > > > > > (jmock)?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In other news ive been working on replacing the GXP
(Google
> XML
> > > > > Pages)
> > > > > > > > which create html pages from a xml markup into standard
HTML.
> > > This
> > > > is
> > > > > > > work
> > > > > > > > being done to seperate the frontend and make it more
modern,
> > more
> > > > > will
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > shown in coming week. After GXP is removed attention
will
> then
> > > turn
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > Protobuf setup we have which atm needs to go through
another
> > > > > utility, I
> > > > > > > > hope to remove this extra step with the transition
to proto3.
> > > This
> > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > mean the sub project PST (protobuf strings templates),
would
> be
> > > > > > > depreciated
> > > > > > > > and can be lost to the void.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > After this transitioning the clicent away from the
server
> will
> > be
> > > > top
> > > > > > > > priority to allow swellrt to integrate without having
bloat.
> > Tis
> > > > does
> > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > mean Wave's intentional purpose is being changed but
the
> entire
> > > UI
> > > > > will
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > getting an upgrade as it gets transitioned, so expect
to see
> > new
> > > > > mixed
> > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > old for a little while.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ~ Evan
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message