incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Should we remove Federation?
Date Thu, 07 Apr 2016 22:10:59 GMT
Removing the current implementation is fine, I see no problems with that,
aslong as theres enough documents to be able to recreate it from spec.
On 08/04/2016 2:22 AM, "Yuri Z" <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:

> I cannot agree more, Wave is about federation. But, the current
> implementation is broken, hard to fix and never worked fine. We need to
> think about better implementation. And there's no point to keep current
> broken implementation that can't work.
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 6:55 PM Dave Ball <wave@glark.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > I only exist in the peanut gallery, but this reflects my feelings too.
> > Wave isn't wave without federation... I wish I had the time to help :-(
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > On 07/04/16 16:42, Thomas Wrobel wrote:
> > > I'm not sure there's any point in wave without federation frankly.
> > > I supported wave because I didn't want the net turning into "facebook
> > > protocols" and "google protocols" etc.  We need new emails. Protocols
> > > that allow people on different servers to communicate, not protocols
> > > trying to get everyone on the same companies server.
> > > I still fear a future of incompatibility. Of people having to be on
> > > server X because their friends are all on server X (and thus server X
> > > has no incentive to ever get better). Email is getting increasingly
> > > dated, and there's not much else federated out there even today. As
> > > the web grows into real-space applications, there will be probably
> > > even greater need for open communications standards.
> > > While the comparison of email interface wise might have harmed wave
> > > somewhat from a user expectation standpoint, I do think the same needs
> > > are there - a new federated, open, protocol to deal with today's web.
> > > - sigh -
> > > --
> > > http://lostagain.nl <-- our company site.
> > > http://fanficmaker.com <-- our, really,really, bad story generator.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7 April 2016 at 17:25, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Hi
> > >> Currently the federation is broken and requires a significant effort
> to
> > >> fix. Moreover, it never worked perfectly and always was a kind of
> Proof
> > Of
> > >> Concept version. I doubt we can improve the current implementation to
> be
> > >> something stable.
> > >> Therefore I suggest to remove from Wave source all code and
> dependencies
> > >> related to Federation.
> > >> Thoughts?
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message