incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Wave 0.4.0-rc10
Date Sun, 29 Nov 2015 10:15:46 GMT
Im assuming since we havnt heard anything the situation is still the same?

On 17 November 2015 at 03:33, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk> wrote:

> Bug and nudge on general@incubator.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015, at 04:40 PM, Michael MacFadden wrote:
> > Is there anything we can do to help with that?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11/14/15, 6:07 AM, "Ali Lown" <a.lown0@gmail.com on behalf of
> > ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> >
> > >I am trying to get enough votes from IPMC, we need 3 but only have 2
> > >currently (Justin, Christian).
> > >
> > >Ali
> > >
> > >On 14 November 2015 at 00:25, Evan Hughes <ehugh1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Is the release still stuck due to the issue the general member is
> having?
> > >> On 06/11/2015 4:13 AM, "Upayavira" <uv@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Ahh, got it. What you meant was:
> > >>>   6 committer votes
> > >>>   1 mentor vote
> > >>>   4 non-binding
> > >>>
> > >>> I took it to mean 6 votes total, of which 1 mentor and 4 non-bonding.
> > >>>
> > >>> Clarity shines forth, thank you.
> > >>>
> > >>> Are you now in a position to forward this to general@incubator?
> > >>>
> > >>> Thx
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015, at 05:10 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> > >>> > Upayavira,
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Am I overlooking something?
> > >>> >
> > >>> > I definitely wrote 6 committer votes (+1 mentor vote) in the email
> > >>> > dated 3rd November.
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Ali
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On 3 November 2015 at 19:46, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk>
wrote:
> > >>> > > Congrats Ali, and good luck with your future plans!
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Can I ask you to check those tallies? I'm sure there are
more
> > >>> > > committer/PPMC member votes than two.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Upayavira
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015, at 03:22 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> > >>> > >> Hi all,
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> Thanks for taking part in verifying this release candidate,
it
> is
> > >>> > >> great to finally be able to take a potential release
to the
> others in
> > >>> > >> the incubator!
> > >>> > >> (I apologize for not following up sooner, I have finally
> graduated
> > >>> > >> from Uni, so am now sorting out what comes next...)
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> These results supersede the email I sent dated 18th October,
> with the
> > >>> > >> results now looking like:
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> +1: 6 (+1 mentor, +4 non-binding)
> > >>> > >> +0: 0
> > >>> > >> -0:  0
> > >>> > >> -1:  0
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> Ali
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> On 18 October 2015 at 02:48, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
wrote:
> > >>> > >> > Hi all,
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > Thanks to Yuri and Jeremy for downloading and trying
out this
> RC.
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > Well, I set a "deadline" around the 17th October
which has
> now well
> > >>> > >> > and truly passed.
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > My vote on the matter was a +1 (though I realize
that I
> failed to
> > >>> put
> > >>> > >> > this in my original email, so you are allowed to
ignore this
> for
> > >>> > >> > failing to meet my own deadline).
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > The result looks something like (including mine):
> > >>> > >> > +1: 3 (2 binding)
> > >>> > >> > +0: 0
> > >>> > >> > -0: 0
> > >>> > >> > -1: 0
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > Unfortunately we have had insufficient votes to
meet the
> release
> > >>> > >> > requirement (minimum of 3 +1 binding votes, more
+ than -)
> [0].
> > >>> > >> > Binding votes as decided by people in [1].
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > @Yuri/Jeremy: How do you feel now about us moving
away from
> Apache,
> > >>> as
> > >>> > >> > this vote does seem to suggest that there is not
enough
> interest
> > >>> from
> > >>> > >> > the currently defined committers to maintain this
project
> here.
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > I am not really sure why none of the other committers
> responded at
> > >>> all
> > >>> > >> > to the vote...
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > Ali
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > [0]:
> > >>>
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification
> > >>> > >> > [1]:
> https://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#wave
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > On 14 October 2015 at 17:27, Jérémy Naegel <
> jeremy.ngl@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> > >> >> +1
> > >>> > >> >>
> > >>> > >> >> +Jérémy Naegel <http://google.com/+JérémyNaegel
> <http://google.com/+J%C3%A9r%C3%A9myNaegel>
> > >>> <http://google.com/+J%C3%A9r%C3%A9myNaegel>>
> > >>> > >> >> Public Information Officer
> > >>> > >> >>
> > >>> > >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>> > >> >>
> > >>> > >> >>> +1
> > >>> > >> >>> I did the following:
> > >>> > >> >>> - Checked signatures
> > >>> > >> >>> - Opened the binary and verified it works.
> > >>> > >> >>> - Opened the source and verified that it
can be built and
> works.
> > >>> > >> >>> - Reviewed the changes for the rc 10.
> > >>> > >> >>>
> > >>> > >> >>> Ali - Thanks for making this RC!
> > >>> > >> >>>
> > >>> > >> >>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:59 AM Ali Lown
<ali@lown.me.uk>
> wrote:
> > >>> > >> >>>
> > >>> > >> >>> > Hi all,
> > >>> > >> >>> >
> > >>> > >> >>> > RC10 is now available for review.
> > >>> > >> >>> > Artefacts can be found here:
> > >>> > >> >>> > https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc10/
> > >>> > >> >>> > (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md
SHA512 $f >
> > >>> $f.sha')
> > >>> > >> >>> >
> > >>> > >> >>> > I have included both source and binary
artefacts for
> > >>> convenience.
> > >>> > >> >>> >
> > >>> > >> >>> > The release version (if successful)
will be
> 0.4.0-incubating
> > >>> > >> >>> >
> > >>> > >> >>> > This is taken from the branch 0.4.0-rc10
of the
> incubator-wave
> > >>> > >> >>> repository.
> > >>> > >> >>> >
> > >>> > >> >>> > Notable changes since earlier initial
release attempts
> include:
> > >>> > >> >>> > - Use of typesafe config
> > >>> > >> >>> > - Bumped versions of Jetty, GWT, etc.
> > >>> > >> >>> > - Assorted tweaks to build system
> > >>> > >> >>> >
> > >>> > >> >>> > A summary of useful information can
be found in
> RELEASE-NOTES,
> > >>> and a
> > >>> > >> >>> > list of changes in CHANGES in the source
artefacts.
> > >>> > >> >>> >
> > >>> > >> >>> > Action Required:
> > >>> > >> >>> > Please go and test these packages (most
importantly the
> source
> > >>> ones)
> > >>> > >> >>> > for any outstanding legal problems,
or any runtime
> problems in a
> > >>> > >> >>> > 'standard' configuration.
> > >>> > >> >>> >
> > >>> > >> >>> > We are not looking for a perfect first
release, as there
> is
> > >>> plenty of
> > >>> > >> >>> > time to fix outstanding bugs in future
releases, but we
> do want
> > >>> to get
> > >>> > >> >>> > 0.4 out soon (at long last).
> > >>> > >> >>> >
> > >>> > >> >>> > This vote will close around 0000 GMT
17th October 2015.
> > >>> > >> >>> >
> > >>> > >> >>> > [ ] +1 Release it!
> > >>> > >> >>> > [ ] +0 Ok, but...
> > >>> > >> >>> > [ ] -0  Ok, but you really should fix...
> > >>> > >> >>> > [ ] -1 Definitely do not release this
because...
> > >>> > >> >>> >
> > >>> > >> >>> > Thanks,
> > >>> > >> >>> > Ali
> > >>> > >> >>> >
> > >>> > >> >>>
> > >>>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message