incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ali Lown <...@lown.me.uk>
Subject Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Wave 0.4.0-rc10
Date Tue, 03 Nov 2015 15:22:55 GMT
Hi all,

Thanks for taking part in verifying this release candidate, it is
great to finally be able to take a potential release to the others in
the incubator!
(I apologize for not following up sooner, I have finally graduated
from Uni, so am now sorting out what comes next...)

These results supersede the email I sent dated 18th October, with the
results now looking like:

+1: 6 (+1 mentor, +4 non-binding)
+0: 0
-0:  0
-1:  0

Ali

On 18 October 2015 at 02:48, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks to Yuri and Jeremy for downloading and trying out this RC.
>
> Well, I set a "deadline" around the 17th October which has now well
> and truly passed.
>
> My vote on the matter was a +1 (though I realize that I failed to put
> this in my original email, so you are allowed to ignore this for
> failing to meet my own deadline).
>
> The result looks something like (including mine):
> +1: 3 (2 binding)
> +0: 0
> -0: 0
> -1: 0
>
> Unfortunately we have had insufficient votes to meet the release
> requirement (minimum of 3 +1 binding votes, more + than -) [0].
> Binding votes as decided by people in [1].
>
> @Yuri/Jeremy: How do you feel now about us moving away from Apache, as
> this vote does seem to suggest that there is not enough interest from
> the currently defined committers to maintain this project here.
>
> I am not really sure why none of the other committers responded at all
> to the vote...
>
> Ali
>
> [0]: https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification
> [1]: https://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#wave
>
> On 14 October 2015 at 17:27, Jérémy Naegel <jeremy.ngl@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> +Jérémy Naegel <http://google.com/+JérémyNaegel>
>> Public Information Officer
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>> I did the following:
>>> - Checked signatures
>>> - Opened the binary and verified it works.
>>> - Opened the source and verified that it can be built and works.
>>> - Reviewed the changes for the rc 10.
>>>
>>> Ali - Thanks for making this RC!
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:59 AM Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > RC10 is now available for review.
>>> > Artefacts can be found here:
>>> > https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc10/
>>> > (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha')
>>> >
>>> > I have included both source and binary artefacts for convenience.
>>> >
>>> > The release version (if successful) will be 0.4.0-incubating
>>> >
>>> > This is taken from the branch 0.4.0-rc10 of the incubator-wave
>>> repository.
>>> >
>>> > Notable changes since earlier initial release attempts include:
>>> > - Use of typesafe config
>>> > - Bumped versions of Jetty, GWT, etc.
>>> > - Assorted tweaks to build system
>>> >
>>> > A summary of useful information can be found in RELEASE-NOTES, and a
>>> > list of changes in CHANGES in the source artefacts.
>>> >
>>> > Action Required:
>>> > Please go and test these packages (most importantly the source ones)
>>> > for any outstanding legal problems, or any runtime problems in a
>>> > 'standard' configuration.
>>> >
>>> > We are not looking for a perfect first release, as there is plenty of
>>> > time to fix outstanding bugs in future releases, but we do want to get
>>> > 0.4 out soon (at long last).
>>> >
>>> > This vote will close around 0000 GMT 17th October 2015.
>>> >
>>> > [ ] +1 Release it!
>>> > [ ] +0 Ok, but...
>>> > [ ] -0  Ok, but you really should fix...
>>> > [ ] -1 Definitely do not release this because...
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Ali
>>> >
>>>

Mime
View raw message