incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ali Lown <...@lown.me.uk>
Subject Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Wave 0.4.0-rc10
Date Sat, 14 Nov 2015 14:07:13 GMT
I am trying to get enough votes from IPMC, we need 3 but only have 2
currently (Justin, Christian).

Ali

On 14 November 2015 at 00:25, Evan Hughes <ehugh1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is the release still stuck due to the issue the general member is having?
> On 06/11/2015 4:13 AM, "Upayavira" <uv@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Ahh, got it. What you meant was:
>>   6 committer votes
>>   1 mentor vote
>>   4 non-binding
>>
>> I took it to mean 6 votes total, of which 1 mentor and 4 non-bonding.
>>
>> Clarity shines forth, thank you.
>>
>> Are you now in a position to forward this to general@incubator?
>>
>> Thx
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015, at 05:10 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
>> > Upayavira,
>> >
>> > Am I overlooking something?
>> >
>> > I definitely wrote 6 committer votes (+1 mentor vote) in the email
>> > dated 3rd November.
>> >
>> >
>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>> >
>> > Ali
>> >
>> > On 3 November 2015 at 19:46, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>> > > Congrats Ali, and good luck with your future plans!
>> > >
>> > > Can I ask you to check those tallies? I'm sure there are more
>> > > committer/PPMC member votes than two.
>> > >
>> > > Upayavira
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015, at 03:22 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
>> > >> Hi all,
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks for taking part in verifying this release candidate, it is
>> > >> great to finally be able to take a potential release to the others
in
>> > >> the incubator!
>> > >> (I apologize for not following up sooner, I have finally graduated
>> > >> from Uni, so am now sorting out what comes next...)
>> > >>
>> > >> These results supersede the email I sent dated 18th October, with the
>> > >> results now looking like:
>> > >>
>> > >> +1: 6 (+1 mentor, +4 non-binding)
>> > >> +0: 0
>> > >> -0:  0
>> > >> -1:  0
>> > >>
>> > >> Ali
>> > >>
>> > >> On 18 October 2015 at 02:48, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>> > >> > Hi all,
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Thanks to Yuri and Jeremy for downloading and trying out this
RC.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Well, I set a "deadline" around the 17th October which has now
well
>> > >> > and truly passed.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > My vote on the matter was a +1 (though I realize that I failed
to
>> put
>> > >> > this in my original email, so you are allowed to ignore this for
>> > >> > failing to meet my own deadline).
>> > >> >
>> > >> > The result looks something like (including mine):
>> > >> > +1: 3 (2 binding)
>> > >> > +0: 0
>> > >> > -0: 0
>> > >> > -1: 0
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Unfortunately we have had insufficient votes to meet the release
>> > >> > requirement (minimum of 3 +1 binding votes, more + than -) [0].
>> > >> > Binding votes as decided by people in [1].
>> > >> >
>> > >> > @Yuri/Jeremy: How do you feel now about us moving away from Apache,
>> as
>> > >> > this vote does seem to suggest that there is not enough interest
>> from
>> > >> > the currently defined committers to maintain this project here.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I am not really sure why none of the other committers responded
at
>> all
>> > >> > to the vote...
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Ali
>> > >> >
>> > >> > [0]:
>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification
>> > >> > [1]: https://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#wave
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On 14 October 2015 at 17:27, Jérémy Naegel <jeremy.ngl@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >> >> +1
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> +Jérémy Naegel <http://google.com/+JérémyNaegel
>> <http://google.com/+J%C3%A9r%C3%A9myNaegel>>
>> > >> >> Public Information Officer
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>> +1
>> > >> >>> I did the following:
>> > >> >>> - Checked signatures
>> > >> >>> - Opened the binary and verified it works.
>> > >> >>> - Opened the source and verified that it can be built
and works.
>> > >> >>> - Reviewed the changes for the rc 10.
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> Ali - Thanks for making this RC!
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:59 AM Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
wrote:
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> > Hi all,
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > RC10 is now available for review.
>> > >> >>> > Artefacts can be found here:
>> > >> >>> > https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc10/
>> > >> >>> > (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512
$f >
>> $f.sha')
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > I have included both source and binary artefacts
for
>> convenience.
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > The release version (if successful) will be 0.4.0-incubating
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > This is taken from the branch 0.4.0-rc10 of the incubator-wave
>> > >> >>> repository.
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > Notable changes since earlier initial release attempts
include:
>> > >> >>> > - Use of typesafe config
>> > >> >>> > - Bumped versions of Jetty, GWT, etc.
>> > >> >>> > - Assorted tweaks to build system
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > A summary of useful information can be found in RELEASE-NOTES,
>> and a
>> > >> >>> > list of changes in CHANGES in the source artefacts.
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > Action Required:
>> > >> >>> > Please go and test these packages (most importantly
the source
>> ones)
>> > >> >>> > for any outstanding legal problems, or any runtime
problems in a
>> > >> >>> > 'standard' configuration.
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > We are not looking for a perfect first release, as
there is
>> plenty of
>> > >> >>> > time to fix outstanding bugs in future releases,
but we do want
>> to get
>> > >> >>> > 0.4 out soon (at long last).
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > This vote will close around 0000 GMT 17th October
2015.
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > [ ] +1 Release it!
>> > >> >>> > [ ] +0 Ok, but...
>> > >> >>> > [ ] -0  Ok, but you really should fix...
>> > >> >>> > [ ] -1 Definitely do not release this because...
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > Thanks,
>> > >> >>> > Ali
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>>

Mime
View raw message