incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael MacFadden <michael.macfad...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Wave 0.4.0-rc10
Date Mon, 16 Nov 2015 16:40:48 GMT
Is there anything we can do to help with that?




On 11/14/15, 6:07 AM, "Ali Lown" <a.lown0@gmail.com on behalf of ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:

>I am trying to get enough votes from IPMC, we need 3 but only have 2
>currently (Justin, Christian).
>
>Ali
>
>On 14 November 2015 at 00:25, Evan Hughes <ehugh1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is the release still stuck due to the issue the general member is having?
>> On 06/11/2015 4:13 AM, "Upayavira" <uv@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Ahh, got it. What you meant was:
>>>   6 committer votes
>>>   1 mentor vote
>>>   4 non-binding
>>>
>>> I took it to mean 6 votes total, of which 1 mentor and 4 non-bonding.
>>>
>>> Clarity shines forth, thank you.
>>>
>>> Are you now in a position to forward this to general@incubator?
>>>
>>> Thx
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015, at 05:10 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
>>> > Upayavira,
>>> >
>>> > Am I overlooking something?
>>> >
>>> > I definitely wrote 6 committer votes (+1 mentor vote) in the email
>>> > dated 3rd November.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>> >
>>> > Ali
>>> >
>>> > On 3 November 2015 at 19:46, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>> > > Congrats Ali, and good luck with your future plans!
>>> > >
>>> > > Can I ask you to check those tallies? I'm sure there are more
>>> > > committer/PPMC member votes than two.
>>> > >
>>> > > Upayavira
>>> > >
>>> > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015, at 03:22 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
>>> > >> Hi all,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Thanks for taking part in verifying this release candidate, it
is
>>> > >> great to finally be able to take a potential release to the others
in
>>> > >> the incubator!
>>> > >> (I apologize for not following up sooner, I have finally graduated
>>> > >> from Uni, so am now sorting out what comes next...)
>>> > >>
>>> > >> These results supersede the email I sent dated 18th October, with
the
>>> > >> results now looking like:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> +1: 6 (+1 mentor, +4 non-binding)
>>> > >> +0: 0
>>> > >> -0:  0
>>> > >> -1:  0
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Ali
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On 18 October 2015 at 02:48, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>>> > >> > Hi all,
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Thanks to Yuri and Jeremy for downloading and trying out this
RC.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Well, I set a "deadline" around the 17th October which has
now well
>>> > >> > and truly passed.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > My vote on the matter was a +1 (though I realize that I failed
to
>>> put
>>> > >> > this in my original email, so you are allowed to ignore this
for
>>> > >> > failing to meet my own deadline).
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > The result looks something like (including mine):
>>> > >> > +1: 3 (2 binding)
>>> > >> > +0: 0
>>> > >> > -0: 0
>>> > >> > -1: 0
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Unfortunately we have had insufficient votes to meet the release
>>> > >> > requirement (minimum of 3 +1 binding votes, more + than -)
[0].
>>> > >> > Binding votes as decided by people in [1].
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > @Yuri/Jeremy: How do you feel now about us moving away from
Apache,
>>> as
>>> > >> > this vote does seem to suggest that there is not enough interest
>>> from
>>> > >> > the currently defined committers to maintain this project
here.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > I am not really sure why none of the other committers responded
at
>>> all
>>> > >> > to the vote...
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > Ali
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > [0]:
>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification
>>> > >> > [1]: https://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#wave
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > On 14 October 2015 at 17:27, Jérémy Naegel <jeremy.ngl@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >> >> +1
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> +Jérémy Naegel <http://google.com/+JérémyNaegel
>>> <http://google.com/+J%C3%A9r%C3%A9myNaegel>>
>>> > >> >> Public Information Officer
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>> > >> >>
>>> > >> >>> +1
>>> > >> >>> I did the following:
>>> > >> >>> - Checked signatures
>>> > >> >>> - Opened the binary and verified it works.
>>> > >> >>> - Opened the source and verified that it can be built
and works.
>>> > >> >>> - Reviewed the changes for the rc 10.
>>> > >> >>>
>>> > >> >>> Ali - Thanks for making this RC!
>>> > >> >>>
>>> > >> >>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:59 AM Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
wrote:
>>> > >> >>>
>>> > >> >>> > Hi all,
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> > RC10 is now available for review.
>>> > >> >>> > Artefacts can be found here:
>>> > >> >>> > https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc10/
>>> > >> >>> > (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md
SHA512 $f >
>>> $f.sha')
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> > I have included both source and binary artefacts
for
>>> convenience.
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> > The release version (if successful) will be 0.4.0-incubating
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> > This is taken from the branch 0.4.0-rc10 of the
incubator-wave
>>> > >> >>> repository.
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> > Notable changes since earlier initial release
attempts include:
>>> > >> >>> > - Use of typesafe config
>>> > >> >>> > - Bumped versions of Jetty, GWT, etc.
>>> > >> >>> > - Assorted tweaks to build system
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> > A summary of useful information can be found
in RELEASE-NOTES,
>>> and a
>>> > >> >>> > list of changes in CHANGES in the source artefacts.
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> > Action Required:
>>> > >> >>> > Please go and test these packages (most importantly
the source
>>> ones)
>>> > >> >>> > for any outstanding legal problems, or any runtime
problems in a
>>> > >> >>> > 'standard' configuration.
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> > We are not looking for a perfect first release,
as there is
>>> plenty of
>>> > >> >>> > time to fix outstanding bugs in future releases,
but we do want
>>> to get
>>> > >> >>> > 0.4 out soon (at long last).
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> > This vote will close around 0000 GMT 17th October
2015.
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> > [ ] +1 Release it!
>>> > >> >>> > [ ] +0 Ok, but...
>>> > >> >>> > [ ] -0  Ok, but you really should fix...
>>> > >> >>> > [ ] -1 Definitely do not release this because...
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>> > Thanks,
>>> > >> >>> > Ali
>>> > >> >>> >
>>> > >> >>>
>>>


Mime
View raw message