incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Wave 0.4.0-rc10
Date Sun, 18 Oct 2015 05:34:52 GMT
woops thought monday was the cutoff

On 18 October 2015 at 12:33, Zachary Yaro <zmyaro@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would have cast a vote, but I read non-binding votes were discouraged.
> To clarify, what are the criteria for being able to cast a binding vote for
> this project?
>
> Zachary Yaro
>
> On 17 October 2015 at 21:48, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Thanks to Yuri and Jeremy for downloading and trying out this RC.
> >
> > Well, I set a "deadline" around the 17th October which has now well
> > and truly passed.
> >
> > My vote on the matter was a +1 (though I realize that I failed to put
> > this in my original email, so you are allowed to ignore this for
> > failing to meet my own deadline).
> >
> > The result looks something like (including mine):
> > +1: 3 (2 binding)
> > +0: 0
> > -0: 0
> > -1: 0
> >
> > Unfortunately we have had insufficient votes to meet the release
> > requirement (minimum of 3 +1 binding votes, more + than -) [0].
> > Binding votes as decided by people in [1].
> >
> > @Yuri/Jeremy: How do you feel now about us moving away from Apache, as
> > this vote does seem to suggest that there is not enough interest from
> > the currently defined committers to maintain this project here.
> >
> > I am not really sure why none of the other committers responded at all
> > to the vote...
> >
> > Ali
> >
> > [0]:
> > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification
> > [1]: https://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#wave
> >
> > On 14 October 2015 at 17:27, Jérémy Naegel <jeremy.ngl@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > +Jérémy Naegel <http://google.com/+JérémyNaegel
> <http://google.com/+J%C3%A9r%C3%A9myNaegel>
> > <http://google.com/+J%C3%A9r%C3%A9myNaegel>>
> > > Public Information Officer
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1
> > >> I did the following:
> > >> - Checked signatures
> > >> - Opened the binary and verified it works.
> > >> - Opened the source and verified that it can be built and works.
> > >> - Reviewed the changes for the rc 10.
> > >>
> > >> Ali - Thanks for making this RC!
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:59 AM Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi all,
> > >> >
> > >> > RC10 is now available for review.
> > >> > Artefacts can be found here:
> > >> > https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc10/
> > >> > (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha')
> > >> >
> > >> > I have included both source and binary artefacts for convenience.
> > >> >
> > >> > The release version (if successful) will be 0.4.0-incubating
> > >> >
> > >> > This is taken from the branch 0.4.0-rc10 of the incubator-wave
> > >> repository.
> > >> >
> > >> > Notable changes since earlier initial release attempts include:
> > >> > - Use of typesafe config
> > >> > - Bumped versions of Jetty, GWT, etc.
> > >> > - Assorted tweaks to build system
> > >> >
> > >> > A summary of useful information can be found in RELEASE-NOTES, and
a
> > >> > list of changes in CHANGES in the source artefacts.
> > >> >
> > >> > Action Required:
> > >> > Please go and test these packages (most importantly the source ones)
> > >> > for any outstanding legal problems, or any runtime problems in a
> > >> > 'standard' configuration.
> > >> >
> > >> > We are not looking for a perfect first release, as there is plenty
> of
> > >> > time to fix outstanding bugs in future releases, but we do want to
> get
> > >> > 0.4 out soon (at long last).
> > >> >
> > >> > This vote will close around 0000 GMT 17th October 2015.
> > >> >
> > >> > [ ] +1 Release it!
> > >> > [ ] +0 Ok, but...
> > >> > [ ] -0  Ok, but you really should fix...
> > >> > [ ] -1 Definitely do not release this because...
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Ali
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message