incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Incubation
Date Wed, 07 Oct 2015 13:01:37 GMT
maybe instead of deciding the end instead you and Christian set goals that
must be completed by the next checkpoint aka have x amount of submits, have
x more active contributors to help gain momentum. If the tasks are not
completed sufficiently or dismally fail then sure maybe its for the best.

On 7 October 2015 at 22:44, Evan Hughes <ehugh1@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well as the video discussion we had earlier this year, the main problem
> has been the complexity. We have been taking steps in this direction with;
>
> * reducing technical debt (removing updating dependencies), can bee seen
> from patches last week and there has been work in a gradle or sbt build
> system which allows people to understand how the project works together.
>
> I personally have been looking into giving the website a fresh coat of
> paint in the past couple of weeks (infrastructures docs on building locally
> are eh if not on a mac ;) but did get it working). We have also had the
> addition of the android project for wave.
>
> Progress might be slow but progress is still being made.
>
> On 7 October 2015 at 20:54, Upayavira <upayavira@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I need to sign off the Wave report, but find this difficult.
>>
>> The Apache Incubator exists to facilitate projects moving towards being
>> fully fledged ASF projects. Wave has been
>> incubating since 2010, and in that time it has not yet been able to
>> build a community that is likely to sustain itself as an ASF
>> project.
>>
>> It does, therefore, seem to me that it is time for us to retire as a
>> podling, and allow people here to continue in a location more fitting
>> with the current level of effort, without the expectation that it needs
>> to meet some specific set of incubation requirements.
>>
>> Note that all of the source code is Apache Licensed, meaning it can be
>> forked elsewhere - the only discussion required is the name that the
>> relocated project would take.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Upayavira
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message