incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Wave 0.4.0-rc10
Date Sun, 18 Oct 2015 06:52:31 GMT
I think we should try to contact some of them again and see if we can get
the vote over. If we fail again - then we should move away.

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 8:35 AM Evan Hughes <ehugh1@gmail.com> wrote:

> woops thought monday was the cutoff
>
> On 18 October 2015 at 12:33, Zachary Yaro <zmyaro@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I would have cast a vote, but I read non-binding votes were discouraged.
> > To clarify, what are the criteria for being able to cast a binding vote
> for
> > this project?
> >
> > Zachary Yaro
> >
> > On 17 October 2015 at 21:48, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Thanks to Yuri and Jeremy for downloading and trying out this RC.
> > >
> > > Well, I set a "deadline" around the 17th October which has now well
> > > and truly passed.
> > >
> > > My vote on the matter was a +1 (though I realize that I failed to put
> > > this in my original email, so you are allowed to ignore this for
> > > failing to meet my own deadline).
> > >
> > > The result looks something like (including mine):
> > > +1: 3 (2 binding)
> > > +0: 0
> > > -0: 0
> > > -1: 0
> > >
> > > Unfortunately we have had insufficient votes to meet the release
> > > requirement (minimum of 3 +1 binding votes, more + than -) [0].
> > > Binding votes as decided by people in [1].
> > >
> > > @Yuri/Jeremy: How do you feel now about us moving away from Apache, as
> > > this vote does seem to suggest that there is not enough interest from
> > > the currently defined committers to maintain this project here.
> > >
> > > I am not really sure why none of the other committers responded at all
> > > to the vote...
> > >
> > > Ali
> > >
> > > [0]:
> > >
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification
> > > [1]: https://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#wave
> > >
> > > On 14 October 2015 at 17:27, Jérémy Naegel <jeremy.ngl@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > +Jérémy Naegel <http://google.com/+JérémyNaegel
> <http://google.com/+J%C3%A9r%C3%A9myNaegel>
> > <http://google.com/+J%C3%A9r%C3%A9myNaegel>
> > > <http://google.com/+J%C3%A9r%C3%A9myNaegel>>
> > > > Public Information Officer
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1
> > > >> I did the following:
> > > >> - Checked signatures
> > > >> - Opened the binary and verified it works.
> > > >> - Opened the source and verified that it can be built and works.
> > > >> - Reviewed the changes for the rc 10.
> > > >>
> > > >> Ali - Thanks for making this RC!
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:59 AM Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi all,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > RC10 is now available for review.
> > > >> > Artefacts can be found here:
> > > >> > https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc10/
> > > >> > (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha')
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I have included both source and binary artefacts for convenience.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The release version (if successful) will be 0.4.0-incubating
> > > >> >
> > > >> > This is taken from the branch 0.4.0-rc10 of the incubator-wave
> > > >> repository.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Notable changes since earlier initial release attempts include:
> > > >> > - Use of typesafe config
> > > >> > - Bumped versions of Jetty, GWT, etc.
> > > >> > - Assorted tweaks to build system
> > > >> >
> > > >> > A summary of useful information can be found in RELEASE-NOTES,
> and a
> > > >> > list of changes in CHANGES in the source artefacts.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Action Required:
> > > >> > Please go and test these packages (most importantly the source
> ones)
> > > >> > for any outstanding legal problems, or any runtime problems in
a
> > > >> > 'standard' configuration.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > We are not looking for a perfect first release, as there is plenty
> > of
> > > >> > time to fix outstanding bugs in future releases, but we do want
to
> > get
> > > >> > 0.4 out soon (at long last).
> > > >> >
> > > >> > This vote will close around 0000 GMT 17th October 2015.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [ ] +1 Release it!
> > > >> > [ ] +0 Ok, but...
> > > >> > [ ] -0  Ok, but you really should fix...
> > > >> > [ ] -1 Definitely do not release this because...
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >> > Ali
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message