incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael MacFadden <michael.macfad...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Wave 0.4.0-rc10
Date Tue, 20 Oct 2015 02:39:49 GMT
All,

I still find the Wave project quite interesting and am more than happy to help.  I just haven’t
really felt the pull of the community.  If I thought there we something specific I could do
to help I would be more than happy.  I would like to see the release finally happen.  Even
if we eventually move away it would be nice to have completed this process once during the
life of the project.

If there is another vote I will participate.  I will review the process and functional status
and provide a vote.

So you can count me in.

~Michael




On 10/18/15, 4:56 AM, "Upayavira" <uv@odoko.co.uk> wrote:

>Non-binding votes have a different value. If we had insufficient
>committer/PPMC votes but loads of quality (I.e not drive by) non-binding
>votes, it would suggest we have a different problem, and could look how
>to addresss that.
>
>Upayavira
>
>On Sat, Oct 17, 2015, at 09:33 PM, Zachary Yaro wrote:
>> I would have cast a vote, but I read non-binding votes were discouraged.
>> To clarify, what are the criteria for being able to cast a binding vote
>> for
>> this project?
>> 
>> Zachary Yaro
>> 
>> On 17 October 2015 at 21:48, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>> 
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Thanks to Yuri and Jeremy for downloading and trying out this RC.
>> >
>> > Well, I set a "deadline" around the 17th October which has now well
>> > and truly passed.
>> >
>> > My vote on the matter was a +1 (though I realize that I failed to put
>> > this in my original email, so you are allowed to ignore this for
>> > failing to meet my own deadline).
>> >
>> > The result looks something like (including mine):
>> > +1: 3 (2 binding)
>> > +0: 0
>> > -0: 0
>> > -1: 0
>> >
>> > Unfortunately we have had insufficient votes to meet the release
>> > requirement (minimum of 3 +1 binding votes, more + than -) [0].
>> > Binding votes as decided by people in [1].
>> >
>> > @Yuri/Jeremy: How do you feel now about us moving away from Apache, as
>> > this vote does seem to suggest that there is not enough interest from
>> > the currently defined committers to maintain this project here.
>> >
>> > I am not really sure why none of the other committers responded at all
>> > to the vote...
>> >
>> > Ali
>> >
>> > [0]:
>> > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification
>> > [1]: https://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#wave
>> >
>> > On 14 October 2015 at 17:27, Jérémy Naegel <jeremy.ngl@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > > +Jérémy Naegel <http://google.com/+JérémyNaegel
>> > <http://google.com/+J%C3%A9r%C3%A9myNaegel>>
>> > > Public Information Officer
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> +1
>> > >> I did the following:
>> > >> - Checked signatures
>> > >> - Opened the binary and verified it works.
>> > >> - Opened the source and verified that it can be built and works.
>> > >> - Reviewed the changes for the rc 10.
>> > >>
>> > >> Ali - Thanks for making this RC!
>> > >>
>> > >> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:59 AM Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > Hi all,
>> > >> >
>> > >> > RC10 is now available for review.
>> > >> > Artefacts can be found here:
>> > >> > https://people.apache.org/~al/wave_rc/0.4-rc10/
>> > >> > (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha')
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I have included both source and binary artefacts for convenience.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > The release version (if successful) will be 0.4.0-incubating
>> > >> >
>> > >> > This is taken from the branch 0.4.0-rc10 of the incubator-wave
>> > >> repository.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Notable changes since earlier initial release attempts include:
>> > >> > - Use of typesafe config
>> > >> > - Bumped versions of Jetty, GWT, etc.
>> > >> > - Assorted tweaks to build system
>> > >> >
>> > >> > A summary of useful information can be found in RELEASE-NOTES,
and a
>> > >> > list of changes in CHANGES in the source artefacts.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Action Required:
>> > >> > Please go and test these packages (most importantly the source
ones)
>> > >> > for any outstanding legal problems, or any runtime problems in
a
>> > >> > 'standard' configuration.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > We are not looking for a perfect first release, as there is plenty
of
>> > >> > time to fix outstanding bugs in future releases, but we do want
to get
>> > >> > 0.4 out soon (at long last).
>> > >> >
>> > >> > This vote will close around 0000 GMT 17th October 2015.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > [ ] +1 Release it!
>> > >> > [ ] +0 Ok, but...
>> > >> > [ ] -0  Ok, but you really should fix...
>> > >> > [ ] -1 Definitely do not release this because...
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Thanks,
>> > >> > Ali
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >


Mime
View raw message