incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Wave Release Candidate 9
Date Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:29:57 GMT
after the release did we want to remove the excess stuff from the
repository, then focus on your sbt refactoring

On 27 June 2015 at 21:43, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:

> We have a dependence on same outdated jar - whack.jar I think. I guess we
> need to proceed with release with stating that federation isn't working. I
> ll create a new release version with this note.
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 4:21 AM Evan Hughes <ehugh1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yuri what ended up happening with the federation bug
> >
> > On 1 June 2015 at 00:03, Evan Hughes <ehugh1@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > If its not a small fix then I +1
> > >
> > > On 31 May 2015 at 20:53, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Yes, please do!
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, May 30, 2015, at 11:01 AM, Yuri Z wrote:
> > >> > Ok, should we then proceed with release while adding a notice that
> > >> > federation is broken atm?
> > >> >
> > >> > On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 11:23 AM Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk>
wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > remember that the intent of this release is to show that we know
> how
> > >> to
> > >> > > do it, not to make it perfect.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > A release with some bugs, given the stage of development of Wave,
> is
> > >> > > potentially a *good* thing rather than a bad one, as it may
> provide
> > >> > > newcomers with the incentive to help fix those bugs.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Let's get a legally correct release out now, and then aim to
> follow
> > it
> > >> > > with another that has more bugs fixed.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Upayavira
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Fri, May 29, 2015, at 09:36 PM, Yuri Z wrote:
> > >> > > > Well, actually it looks like we have an issue with federation...
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:35 PM Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk>
> > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > What I'm waiting to hear is "here's a release that
we've all
> > >> voted on
> > >> > > > > and think is ready", which I will then review and (hopefully)
> > >> pass onto
> > >> > > > > the incubator PMC for further review.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Upayavira
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2015, at 07:59 AM, Ben Hegarty wrote:
> > >> > > > > > A massive +1, that would be a massive help as
I know that I
> > >> spend
> > >> > > ages
> > >> > > > > > figuring that out! :)
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Regards
> > >> > > > > > Ben
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > On 29 May 2015, at 03:15, Evan Hughes <ehugh1@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > idk if this is an interest for you guys but
a part of the
> > >> > > > > documentation I
> > >> > > > > > > was thinking of adding a "vagrant" build
solution. If you
> > >> havnt
> > >> > > heard
> > >> > > > > of
> > >> > > > > > > vagrant its just a virtual machine organiser+.
Let me know
> > if
> > >> you
> > >> > > think
> > >> > > > > > > pushing this forward would help fix the problem
of people
> > not
> > >> > > trying
> > >> > > > > out
> > >> > > > > > > the release candidates and ill put it to
the top of my
> > tbd's.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >> On 27 May 2015 at 21:14, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
> wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >> Yuri,
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >> Yep. I will be free again to put in some
time this
> weekend
> > to
> > >> > > look at
> > >> > > > > this.
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >> I think that I must have broken the third-party
jars that
> > >> enable
> > >> > > > > > >> federation some time when I tidied them
all up a while
> > back.
> > >> > > > > > >> This wasn't found earlier because:
> > >> > > > > > >> 1) Nobody tried a completely clean build
including
> > >> re-fetching
> > >> > > all the
> > >> > > > > > >> third-party objects
> > >> > > > > > >> 2) The binary releases you produced were
made using the
> old
> > >> jars
> > >> > > - so
> > >> > > > > > >> contain one of the missing packages,
hence the binary
> > >> artifacts
> > >> > > were
> > >> > > > > > >> working fine when tested.
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >> Things to note then:
> > >> > > > > > >> 1) Just because the binary artifacts
work, they might not
> > be
> > >> the
> > >> > > same
> > >> > > > > > >> as the source artifacts
> > >> > > > > > >> 2) Always generate releases from a completely
clean check
> > >> out and
> > >> > > run
> > >> > > > > > >> everything again.
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >> We were so close...
> > >> > > > > > >> Ali
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > >>> On 27 May 2015 at 08:33, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >>> It looks like the wave release got
stuck again. Anyways,
> > >> let's
> > >> > > > > discuss
> > >> > > > > > >>> discuss how can we handle this...
> > >> > > > > > >>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:21
PM Yuri Z <
> > vega113@gmail.com>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>> I tested by checking out the
RC 9 branch and fetching
> > >> > > jars/building
> > >> > > > > - it
> > >> > > > > > >>>> worked fine. I didn't check federation.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:25
PM Ali Lown <
> ali@lown.me.uk
> > >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> If you fetch the jars do
you have the same error
> trying
> > to
> > >> > > start
> > >> > > > > the
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> server?
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> Ali
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> On 7 May 2015 07:46,
"Yuri Z" <vega113@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> I didn't fetched the
jars - just copied them from
> > >> existing
> > >> > > folder.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015
at 9:44 AM Yuri Z <
> > >> vega113@gmail.com>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> I see, what was the
issue with federation?
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Thu, May 7,
2015 at 3:00 AM Ali Lown <
> > >> ali@lown.me.uk>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> -1 due to the
inability to start the server with
> > >> federation
> > >> > > > > > >> enabled.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> (I will change
this to +1 if this is me failing to
> > >> build
> > >> > > > > > >> correctly).
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Checked:
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - SHA512 hashes
and GPG signs
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - Built using
JDK7 and ran tests
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - Checked README,
CHANGES, KEYS, RELEASE-NOTES,
> > >> > > build.properties
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - Started server
without federation using file
> > >> backends.
> > >> > > Tested
> > >> > > > > > >> wave
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> creation, simple
editing, etc.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - Artifact naming
seems good.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - Was unable
to start server with federation
> (missing
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> org/xmpp/component/Log).
Seems like a problem with
> > the
> > >> > > whack.jar
> > >> > > > > > >> file
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> that is fetched
during build. This is making me
> > wonder
> > >> how
> > >> > > it
> > >> > > > > > >> worked
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> in the RC8 binary
package? @Yuri: Do you get the
> same
> > >> error
> > >> > > > > here,
> > >> > > > > > >> or
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> do you get something
different when you build from
> > the
> > >> > > artifact
> > >> > > > > > >> in a
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> clean folder?
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Ali
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> On 5 May
2015 at 18:23, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Great, thanks
Ali. I checked that the source
> > compiles
> > >> and
> > >> > > runs.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue
5 May 2015 at 17:39 Ali Lown <
> > ali@lown.me.uk>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I think
we may wish to extend the vote duration,
> as
> > >> no-one
> > >> > > > > > >> seems
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> to
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> have
responded.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I have
just gotten around to this email in my
> > inbox,
> > >> so
> > >> > > hope
> > >> > > > > to
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> get
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> to
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> this
this evening...
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Ali
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On
29 April 2015 at 20:44, Yuri Z <
> > >> vega113@gmail.com>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC9
is now available for review.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Artifacts
can be found here:
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc9
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> (Remember
checksums are from 'gpg --print-md
> > SHA512
> > >> $f >
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> $f.sha')
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> This
time I included only source artifacts.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> The
release version will be: 0.4.0-incubating
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> This
is taken from branch
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >
> > >>
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-RC9
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Reminder
on what included previous release
> > >> candidates:
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC7
and RC8 included:
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -
Release related fixes.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC6
included:
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -
Bug Fixes
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC5
included:
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -
Added MongoDB based deltas store and migration
> > >> tool for
> > >> > > > > > >> deltas
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> migration
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> from
file to mongo based store.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -
Added client/server profiling.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -
Added Atmosphere framework as replacement of
> > >> Socket.IO.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -
Added alternative - Gmail style initials
> > avatars.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -
Decreased number of permutations in dev
> > >> compilation and
> > >> > > > > > >> added
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> GWT
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> superdev
mode.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -
Upgraded the server to Jetty 9.1.1.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -
Added JDK 7 compatibility.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC4
included:
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -
More licensing fixes
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -
Federation works
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -
New and updated translations
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -
And more...
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> A
summary of useful information can be found in
> > >> > > > > > >> RELEASE-NOTES,
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> and
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> a
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> list
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> of
changes in CHANGES at the above artifact
> > >> distribution
> > >> > > > > > >> url, as
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> well as
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> being
included in the tarballs/zips.(zipballs?)
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Action
Required:
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Test
the release and make it works on your
> > >> environment -
> > >> > > at
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> least
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> standard
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> configurations.
Please go over the source files
> > and
> > >> make
> > >> > > sure
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> they
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> don't
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> contain
anything that cannot be released under
> > >> Apache
> > >> > > Wave
> > >> > > > > > >> due
> > >> > > > > > >>>>> to
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> legal
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> issues.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> This
vote will close around 0000 GMT 5-th May
> > 2015.
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [
] +1   Release it!
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [
] +0   OK, but...
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [
] -0    OK, but you really should fix....
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [
] -1    Definitely not because...
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> > >> > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message