incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Wave Release Candidate 9
Date Sat, 27 Jun 2015 11:43:59 GMT
We have a dependence on same outdated jar - whack.jar I think. I guess we
need to proceed with release with stating that federation isn't working. I
ll create a new release version with this note.

On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 4:21 AM Evan Hughes <ehugh1@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yuri what ended up happening with the federation bug
>
> On 1 June 2015 at 00:03, Evan Hughes <ehugh1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > If its not a small fix then I +1
> >
> > On 31 May 2015 at 20:53, Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, please do!
> >>
> >> On Sat, May 30, 2015, at 11:01 AM, Yuri Z wrote:
> >> > Ok, should we then proceed with release while adding a notice that
> >> > federation is broken atm?
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 11:23 AM Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > remember that the intent of this release is to show that we know how
> >> to
> >> > > do it, not to make it perfect.
> >> > >
> >> > > A release with some bugs, given the stage of development of Wave,
is
> >> > > potentially a *good* thing rather than a bad one, as it may provide
> >> > > newcomers with the incentive to help fix those bugs.
> >> > >
> >> > > Let's get a legally correct release out now, and then aim to follow
> it
> >> > > with another that has more bugs fixed.
> >> > >
> >> > > Upayavira
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, May 29, 2015, at 09:36 PM, Yuri Z wrote:
> >> > > > Well, actually it looks like we have an issue with federation...
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:35 PM Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk>
> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > What I'm waiting to hear is "here's a release that we've
all
> >> voted on
> >> > > > > and think is ready", which I will then review and (hopefully)
> >> pass onto
> >> > > > > the incubator PMC for further review.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Upayavira
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2015, at 07:59 AM, Ben Hegarty wrote:
> >> > > > > > A massive +1, that would be a massive help as I know
that I
> >> spend
> >> > > ages
> >> > > > > > figuring that out! :)
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Regards
> >> > > > > > Ben
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > On 29 May 2015, at 03:15, Evan Hughes <ehugh1@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > idk if this is an interest for you guys but a
part of the
> >> > > > > documentation I
> >> > > > > > > was thinking of adding a "vagrant" build solution.
If you
> >> havnt
> >> > > heard
> >> > > > > of
> >> > > > > > > vagrant its just a virtual machine organiser+.
Let me know
> if
> >> you
> >> > > think
> >> > > > > > > pushing this forward would help fix the problem
of people
> not
> >> > > trying
> >> > > > > out
> >> > > > > > > the release candidates and ill put it to the top
of my
> tbd's.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> On 27 May 2015 at 21:14, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> Yuri,
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> Yep. I will be free again to put in some time
this weekend
> to
> >> > > look at
> >> > > > > this.
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> I think that I must have broken the third-party
jars that
> >> enable
> >> > > > > > >> federation some time when I tidied them all
up a while
> back.
> >> > > > > > >> This wasn't found earlier because:
> >> > > > > > >> 1) Nobody tried a completely clean build including
> >> re-fetching
> >> > > all the
> >> > > > > > >> third-party objects
> >> > > > > > >> 2) The binary releases you produced were made
using the old
> >> jars
> >> > > - so
> >> > > > > > >> contain one of the missing packages, hence
the binary
> >> artifacts
> >> > > were
> >> > > > > > >> working fine when tested.
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> Things to note then:
> >> > > > > > >> 1) Just because the binary artifacts work,
they might not
> be
> >> the
> >> > > same
> >> > > > > > >> as the source artifacts
> >> > > > > > >> 2) Always generate releases from a completely
clean check
> >> out and
> >> > > run
> >> > > > > > >> everything again.
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> We were so close...
> >> > > > > > >> Ali
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >>> On 27 May 2015 at 08:33, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>> It looks like the wave release got stuck
again. Anyways,
> >> let's
> >> > > > > discuss
> >> > > > > > >>> discuss how can we handle this...
> >> > > > > > >>>
> >> > > > > > >>>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:21 PM Yuri
Z <
> vega113@gmail.com>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>> I tested by checking out the RC 9
branch and fetching
> >> > > jars/building
> >> > > > > - it
> >> > > > > > >>>> worked fine. I didn't check federation.
> >> > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM
Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk
> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>> If you fetch the jars do you have
the same error trying
> to
> >> > > start
> >> > > > > the
> >> > > > > > >>>>> server?
> >> > > > > > >>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>> Ali
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> On 7 May 2015 07:46, "Yuri
Z" <vega113@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> I didn't fetched the jars
- just copied them from
> >> existing
> >> > > folder.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at
9:44 AM Yuri Z <
> >> vega113@gmail.com>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>> I see, what was the issue
with federation?
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015
at 3:00 AM Ali Lown <
> >> ali@lown.me.uk>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> -1 due to the inability
to start the server with
> >> federation
> >> > > > > > >> enabled.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> (I will change this
to +1 if this is me failing to
> >> build
> >> > > > > > >> correctly).
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Checked:
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - SHA512 hashes and
GPG signs
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - Built using JDK7
and ran tests
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - Checked README,
CHANGES, KEYS, RELEASE-NOTES,
> >> > > build.properties
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - Started server without
federation using file
> >> backends.
> >> > > Tested
> >> > > > > > >> wave
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> creation, simple editing,
etc.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - Artifact naming
seems good.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> - Was unable to start
server with federation (missing
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> org/xmpp/component/Log).
Seems like a problem with
> the
> >> > > whack.jar
> >> > > > > > >> file
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> that is fetched during
build. This is making me
> wonder
> >> how
> >> > > it
> >> > > > > > >> worked
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> in the RC8 binary
package? @Yuri: Do you get the same
> >> error
> >> > > > > here,
> >> > > > > > >> or
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> do you get something
different when you build from
> the
> >> > > artifact
> >> > > > > > >> in a
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> clean folder?
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Ali
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> On 5 May 2015
at 18:23, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Great, thanks
Ali. I checked that the source
> compiles
> >> and
> >> > > runs.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue 5 May
2015 at 17:39 Ali Lown <
> ali@lown.me.uk>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I think we
may wish to extend the vote duration, as
> >> no-one
> >> > > > > > >> seems
> >> > > > > > >>>>> to
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> have responded.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I have just
gotten around to this email in my
> inbox,
> >> so
> >> > > hope
> >> > > > > to
> >> > > > > > >>>>> get
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> to
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> this this
evening...
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Ali
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On 29
April 2015 at 20:44, Yuri Z <
> >> vega113@gmail.com>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC9 is
now available for review.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Artifacts
can be found here:
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc9
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> (Remember
checksums are from 'gpg --print-md
> SHA512
> >> $f >
> >> > > > > > >>>>> $f.sha')
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> This time
I included only source artifacts.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> The release
version will be: 0.4.0-incubating
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> This is
taken from branch
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > >
> >> > >
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-RC9
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Reminder
on what included previous release
> >> candidates:
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC7 and
RC8 included:
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Release
related fixes.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC6 included:
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Bug
Fixes
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC5 included:
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Added
MongoDB based deltas store and migration
> >> tool for
> >> > > > > > >> deltas
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> migration
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> from file
to mongo based store.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Added
client/server profiling.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Added
Atmosphere framework as replacement of
> >> Socket.IO.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Added
alternative - Gmail style initials
> avatars.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Decreased
number of permutations in dev
> >> compilation and
> >> > > > > > >> added
> >> > > > > > >>>>> GWT
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> superdev
mode.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Upgraded
the server to Jetty 9.1.1.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Added
JDK 7 compatibility.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC4 included:
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - More
licensing fixes
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Federation
works
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - New
and updated translations
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> - And
more...
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> A summary
of useful information can be found in
> >> > > > > > >> RELEASE-NOTES,
> >> > > > > > >>>>> and
> >> > > > > > >>>>>> a
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> list
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> of changes
in CHANGES at the above artifact
> >> distribution
> >> > > > > > >> url, as
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> well as
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> being
included in the tarballs/zips.(zipballs?)
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Action
Required:
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Test the
release and make it works on your
> >> environment -
> >> > > at
> >> > > > > > >>>>> least
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> standard
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> configurations.
Please go over the source files
> and
> >> make
> >> > > sure
> >> > > > > > >>>>> they
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> don't
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> contain
anything that cannot be released under
> >> Apache
> >> > > Wave
> >> > > > > > >> due
> >> > > > > > >>>>> to
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> legal
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> issues.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> This vote
will close around 0000 GMT 5-th May
> 2015.
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1
  Release it!
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0
  OK, but...
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -0
   OK, but you really should fix....
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1
   Definitely not because...
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > >
> >> > >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message