incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael MacFadden <michael.macfad...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Wave Release Candidate 9
Date Sun, 31 May 2015 00:39:24 GMT
+1

~Michael

> On May 30, 2015, at 3:01 AM, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Ok, should we then proceed with release while adding a notice that
> federation is broken atm?
> 
>> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 11:23 AM Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>> 
>> remember that the intent of this release is to show that we know how to
>> do it, not to make it perfect.
>> 
>> A release with some bugs, given the stage of development of Wave, is
>> potentially a *good* thing rather than a bad one, as it may provide
>> newcomers with the incentive to help fix those bugs.
>> 
>> Let's get a legally correct release out now, and then aim to follow it
>> with another that has more bugs fixed.
>> 
>> Upayavira
>> 
>>> On Fri, May 29, 2015, at 09:36 PM, Yuri Z wrote:
>>> Well, actually it looks like we have an issue with federation...
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:35 PM Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> What I'm waiting to hear is "here's a release that we've all voted on
>>>> and think is ready", which I will then review and (hopefully) pass onto
>>>> the incubator PMC for further review.
>>>> 
>>>> Upayavira
>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, May 29, 2015, at 07:59 AM, Ben Hegarty wrote:
>>>>> A massive +1, that would be a massive help as I know that I spend
>> ages
>>>>> figuring that out! :)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Ben
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 29 May 2015, at 03:15, Evan Hughes <ehugh1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> idk if this is an interest for you guys but a part of the
>>>> documentation I
>>>>>> was thinking of adding a "vagrant" build solution. If you havnt
>> heard
>>>> of
>>>>>> vagrant its just a virtual machine organiser+. Let me know if you
>> think
>>>>>> pushing this forward would help fix the problem of people not
>> trying
>>>> out
>>>>>> the release candidates and ill put it to the top of my tbd's.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 27 May 2015 at 21:14, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Yuri,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Yep. I will be free again to put in some time this weekend to
>> look at
>>>> this.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I think that I must have broken the third-party jars that enable
>>>>>>> federation some time when I tidied them all up a while back.
>>>>>>> This wasn't found earlier because:
>>>>>>> 1) Nobody tried a completely clean build including re-fetching
>> all the
>>>>>>> third-party objects
>>>>>>> 2) The binary releases you produced were made using the old jars
>> - so
>>>>>>> contain one of the missing packages, hence the binary artifacts
>> were
>>>>>>> working fine when tested.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Things to note then:
>>>>>>> 1) Just because the binary artifacts work, they might not be
the
>> same
>>>>>>> as the source artifacts
>>>>>>> 2) Always generate releases from a completely clean check out
and
>> run
>>>>>>> everything again.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> We were so close...
>>>>>>> Ali
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 27 May 2015 at 08:33, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>> It looks like the wave release got stuck again. Anyways,
let's
>>>> discuss
>>>>>>>> discuss how can we handle this...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:21 PM Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I tested by checking out the RC 9 branch and fetching
>> jars/building
>>>> - it
>>>>>>>>> worked fine. I didn't check federation.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> If you fetch the jars do you have the same error
trying to
>> start
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> server?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Ali
>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 May 2015 07:46, "Yuri Z" <vega113@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't fetched the jars - just copied them
from existing
>> folder.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:44 AM Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I see, what was the issue with federation?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:00 AM Ali Lown
<ali@lown.me.uk>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 due to the inability to start the
server with federation
>>>>>>> enabled.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I will change this to +1 if this is
me failing to build
>>>>>>> correctly).
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Checked:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - SHA512 hashes and GPG signs
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Built using JDK7 and ran tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Checked README, CHANGES, KEYS, RELEASE-NOTES,
>> build.properties
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Started server without federation using
file backends.
>> Tested
>>>>>>> wave
>>>>>>>>>>>>> creation, simple editing, etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Artifact naming seems good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Was unable to start server with federation
(missing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org/xmpp/component/Log). Seems like a
problem with the
>> whack.jar
>>>>>>> file
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is fetched during build. This is
making me wonder how
>> it
>>>>>>> worked
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the RC8 binary package? @Yuri: Do
you get the same error
>>>> here,
>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> do you get something different when you
build from the
>> artifact
>>>>>>> in a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> clean folder?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ali
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5 May 2015 at 18:23, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great, thanks Ali. I checked that
the source compiles and
>> runs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue 5 May 2015 at 17:39 Ali
Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we may wish to extend
the vote duration, as no-one
>>>>>>> seems
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have responded.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have just gotten around to
this email in my inbox, so
>> hope
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this this evening...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ali
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 29 April 2015 at 20:44,
Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC9 is now available for
review.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Artifacts can be found here:
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc9
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Remember checksums are from
'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f >
>>>>>>>>>> $f.sha')
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This time I included only
source artifacts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release version will
be: 0.4.0-incubating
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is taken from branch
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-RC9
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reminder on what included
previous release candidates:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC7 and RC8 included:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release related fixes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC6 included:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Bug Fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC5 included:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Added MongoDB based deltas
store and migration tool for
>>>>>>> deltas
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> migration
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from file to mongo based
store.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Added client/server profiling.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Added Atmosphere framework
as replacement of Socket.IO.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Added alternative - Gmail
style initials avatars.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Decreased number of permutations
in dev compilation and
>>>>>>> added
>>>>>>>>>> GWT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> superdev mode.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Upgraded the server to
Jetty 9.1.1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Added JDK 7 compatibility.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC4 included:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - More licensing fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Federation works
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - New and updated translations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - And more...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A summary of useful information
can be found in
>>>>>>> RELEASE-NOTES,
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of changes in CHANGES at
the above artifact distribution
>>>>>>> url, as
>>>>>>>>>>>>> well as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being included in the tarballs/zips.(zipballs?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Action Required:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Test the release and make
it works on your environment -
>> at
>>>>>>>>>> least
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> standard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> configurations. Please go
over the source files and make
>> sure
>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contain anything that cannot
be released under Apache
>> Wave
>>>>>>> due
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> legal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This vote will close around
0000 GMT 5-th May 2015.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1   Release it!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0   OK, but...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -0    OK, but you really
should fix....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1    Definitely not
because...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>> 

Mime
View raw message