incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Upayavira ...@odoko.co.uk>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Wave Release Candidate 9
Date Sat, 30 May 2015 08:19:16 GMT
remember that the intent of this release is to show that we know how to
do it, not to make it perfect.

A release with some bugs, given the stage of development of Wave, is
potentially a *good* thing rather than a bad one, as it may provide
newcomers with the incentive to help fix those bugs.

Let's get a legally correct release out now, and then aim to follow it
with another that has more bugs fixed.

Upayavira

On Fri, May 29, 2015, at 09:36 PM, Yuri Z wrote:
> Well, actually it looks like we have an issue with federation...
> 
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:35 PM Upayavira <uv@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> > What I'm waiting to hear is "here's a release that we've all voted on
> > and think is ready", which I will then review and (hopefully) pass onto
> > the incubator PMC for further review.
> >
> > Upayavira
> >
> > On Fri, May 29, 2015, at 07:59 AM, Ben Hegarty wrote:
> > > A massive +1, that would be a massive help as I know that I spend ages
> > > figuring that out! :)
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Ben
> > >
> > > > On 29 May 2015, at 03:15, Evan Hughes <ehugh1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > idk if this is an interest for you guys but a part of the
> > documentation I
> > > > was thinking of adding a "vagrant" build solution. If you havnt heard
> > of
> > > > vagrant its just a virtual machine organiser+. Let me know if you think
> > > > pushing this forward would help fix the problem of people not trying
> > out
> > > > the release candidates and ill put it to the top of my tbd's.
> > > >
> > > >> On 27 May 2015 at 21:14, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Yuri,
> > > >>
> > > >> Yep. I will be free again to put in some time this weekend to look
at
> > this.
> > > >>
> > > >> I think that I must have broken the third-party jars that enable
> > > >> federation some time when I tidied them all up a while back.
> > > >> This wasn't found earlier because:
> > > >> 1) Nobody tried a completely clean build including re-fetching all
the
> > > >> third-party objects
> > > >> 2) The binary releases you produced were made using the old jars -
so
> > > >> contain one of the missing packages, hence the binary artifacts were
> > > >> working fine when tested.
> > > >>
> > > >> Things to note then:
> > > >> 1) Just because the binary artifacts work, they might not be the same
> > > >> as the source artifacts
> > > >> 2) Always generate releases from a completely clean check out and
run
> > > >> everything again.
> > > >>
> > > >> We were so close...
> > > >> Ali
> > > >>
> > > >>> On 27 May 2015 at 08:33, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>> It looks like the wave release got stuck again. Anyways, let's
> > discuss
> > > >>> discuss how can we handle this...
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:21 PM Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I tested by checking out the RC 9 branch and fetching jars/building
> > - it
> > > >>>> worked fine. I didn't check federation.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> If you fetch the jars do you have the same error trying
to start
> > the
> > > >>>>> server?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Ali
> > > >>>>>> On 7 May 2015 07:46, "Yuri Z" <vega113@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I didn't fetched the jars - just copied them from
existing folder.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:44 AM Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> I see, what was the issue with federation?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:00 AM Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> -1 due to the inability to start the server
with federation
> > > >> enabled.
> > > >>>>>>>> (I will change this to +1 if this is me failing
to build
> > > >> correctly).
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Checked:
> > > >>>>>>>> - SHA512 hashes and GPG signs
> > > >>>>>>>> - Built using JDK7 and ran tests
> > > >>>>>>>> - Checked README, CHANGES, KEYS, RELEASE-NOTES,
build.properties
> > > >>>>>>>> - Started server without federation using
file backends. Tested
> > > >> wave
> > > >>>>>>>> creation, simple editing, etc.
> > > >>>>>>>> - Artifact naming seems good.
> > > >>>>>>>> - Was unable to start server with federation
(missing
> > > >>>>>>>> org/xmpp/component/Log). Seems like a problem
with the whack.jar
> > > >> file
> > > >>>>>>>> that is fetched during build. This is making
me wonder how it
> > > >> worked
> > > >>>>>>>> in the RC8 binary package? @Yuri: Do you get
the same error
> > here,
> > > >> or
> > > >>>>>>>> do you get something different when you build
from the artifact
> > > >> in a
> > > >>>>>>>> clean folder?
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Ali
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On 5 May 2015 at 18:23, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>> Great, thanks Ali. I checked that the
source compiles and runs.
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue 5 May 2015 at 17:39 Ali Lown
<ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I think we may wish to extend the
vote duration, as no-one
> > > >> seems
> > > >>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>>> have responded.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I have just gotten around to this
email in my inbox, so hope
> > to
> > > >>>>> get
> > > >>>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>>> this this evening...
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Ali
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On 29 April 2015 at 20:44, Yuri
Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC9 is now available for review.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Artifacts can be found here:
> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc9
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> (Remember checksums are from 'gpg
--print-md SHA512 $f >
> > > >>>>> $f.sha')
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> This time I included only source
artifacts.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> The release version will be: 0.4.0-incubating
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> This is taken from branch
> > > >>
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-RC9
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Reminder on what included previous
release candidates:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC7 and RC8 included:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Release related fixes.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC6 included:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Bug Fixes
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC5 included:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Added MongoDB based deltas store
and migration tool for
> > > >> deltas
> > > >>>>>>>>>> migration
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> from file to mongo based store.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Added client/server profiling.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Added Atmosphere framework as
replacement of Socket.IO.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Added alternative - Gmail style
initials avatars.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Decreased number of permutations
in dev compilation and
> > > >> added
> > > >>>>> GWT
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> superdev mode.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Upgraded the server to Jetty
9.1.1.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Added JDK 7 compatibility.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> RC4 included:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> - More licensing fixes
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> - Federation works
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> - New and updated translations
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> - And more...
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> A summary of useful information
can be found in
> > > >> RELEASE-NOTES,
> > > >>>>> and
> > > >>>>>> a
> > > >>>>>>>> list
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> of changes in CHANGES at the above
artifact distribution
> > > >> url, as
> > > >>>>>>>> well as
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> being included in the tarballs/zips.(zipballs?)
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Action Required:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Test the release and make it works
on your environment - at
> > > >>>>> least
> > > >>>>>>>>>> standard
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> configurations. Please go over
the source files and make sure
> > > >>>>> they
> > > >>>>>>>> don't
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> contain anything that cannot be
released under Apache Wave
> > > >> due
> > > >>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>> legal
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> issues.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> This vote will close around 0000
GMT 5-th May 2015.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1   Release it!
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0   OK, but...
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -0    OK, but you really should
fix....
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1    Definitely not because...
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> > > >>
> >

Mime
View raw message