incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Upayavira ...@odoko.co.uk>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Wave Release Candidate 9
Date Fri, 29 May 2015 20:35:26 GMT
What I'm waiting to hear is "here's a release that we've all voted on
and think is ready", which I will then review and (hopefully) pass onto
the incubator PMC for further review.

Upayavira

On Fri, May 29, 2015, at 07:59 AM, Ben Hegarty wrote:
> A massive +1, that would be a massive help as I know that I spend ages
> figuring that out! :) 
> 
> Regards
> Ben
> 
> > On 29 May 2015, at 03:15, Evan Hughes <ehugh1@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > idk if this is an interest for you guys but a part of the documentation I
> > was thinking of adding a "vagrant" build solution. If you havnt heard of
> > vagrant its just a virtual machine organiser+. Let me know if you think
> > pushing this forward would help fix the problem of people not trying out
> > the release candidates and ill put it to the top of my tbd's.
> > 
> >> On 27 May 2015 at 21:14, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> >> 
> >> Yuri,
> >> 
> >> Yep. I will be free again to put in some time this weekend to look at this.
> >> 
> >> I think that I must have broken the third-party jars that enable
> >> federation some time when I tidied them all up a while back.
> >> This wasn't found earlier because:
> >> 1) Nobody tried a completely clean build including re-fetching all the
> >> third-party objects
> >> 2) The binary releases you produced were made using the old jars - so
> >> contain one of the missing packages, hence the binary artifacts were
> >> working fine when tested.
> >> 
> >> Things to note then:
> >> 1) Just because the binary artifacts work, they might not be the same
> >> as the source artifacts
> >> 2) Always generate releases from a completely clean check out and run
> >> everything again.
> >> 
> >> We were so close...
> >> Ali
> >> 
> >>> On 27 May 2015 at 08:33, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> It looks like the wave release got stuck again. Anyways, let's discuss
> >>> discuss how can we handle this...
> >>> 
> >>>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:21 PM Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>> I tested by checking out the RC 9 branch and fetching jars/building
- it
> >>>> worked fine. I didn't check federation.
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:25 PM Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> If you fetch the jars do you have the same error trying to start
the
> >>>>> server?
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Ali
> >>>>>> On 7 May 2015 07:46, "Yuri Z" <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> I didn't fetched the jars - just copied them from existing folder.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:44 AM Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> I see, what was the issue with federation?
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:00 AM Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
wrote:
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> -1 due to the inability to start the server with federation
> >> enabled.
> >>>>>>>> (I will change this to +1 if this is me failing to build
> >> correctly).
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> Checked:
> >>>>>>>> - SHA512 hashes and GPG signs
> >>>>>>>> - Built using JDK7 and ran tests
> >>>>>>>> - Checked README, CHANGES, KEYS, RELEASE-NOTES, build.properties
> >>>>>>>> - Started server without federation using file backends.
Tested
> >> wave
> >>>>>>>> creation, simple editing, etc.
> >>>>>>>> - Artifact naming seems good.
> >>>>>>>> - Was unable to start server with federation (missing
> >>>>>>>> org/xmpp/component/Log). Seems like a problem with the
whack.jar
> >> file
> >>>>>>>> that is fetched during build. This is making me wonder
how it
> >> worked
> >>>>>>>> in the RC8 binary package? @Yuri: Do you get the same
error here,
> >> or
> >>>>>>>> do you get something different when you build from the
artifact
> >> in a
> >>>>>>>> clean folder?
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> Ali
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> On 5 May 2015 at 18:23, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Great, thanks Ali. I checked that the source compiles
and runs.
> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue 5 May 2015 at 17:39 Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>> I think we may wish to extend the vote duration,
as no-one
> >> seems
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> have responded.
> >>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>> I have just gotten around to this email in my
inbox, so hope to
> >>>>> get
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> this this evening...
> >>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>> Ali
> >>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 29 April 2015 at 20:44, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> RC9 is now available for review.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Artifacts can be found here:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc9
> >>>>>>>>>>> (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md
SHA512 $f >
> >>>>> $f.sha')
> >>>>>>>>>>> This time I included only source artifacts.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> The release version will be: 0.4.0-incubating
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> This is taken from branch
> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-RC9
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Reminder on what included previous release
candidates:
> >>>>>>>>>>> RC7 and RC8 included:
> >>>>>>>>>>> - Release related fixes.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> RC6 included:
> >>>>>>>>>>> - Bug Fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> RC5 included:
> >>>>>>>>>>> - Added MongoDB based deltas store and migration
tool for
> >> deltas
> >>>>>>>>>> migration
> >>>>>>>>>>> from file to mongo based store.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> - Added client/server profiling.
> >>>>>>>>>>> - Added Atmosphere framework as replacement
of Socket.IO.
> >>>>>>>>>>> - Added alternative - Gmail style initials
avatars.
> >>>>>>>>>>> - Decreased number of permutations in dev
compilation and
> >> added
> >>>>> GWT
> >>>>>>>>>>> superdev mode.
> >>>>>>>>>>> - Upgraded the server to Jetty 9.1.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>> - Added JDK 7 compatibility.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> RC4 included:
> >>>>>>>>>>> - More licensing fixes
> >>>>>>>>>>> - Federation works
> >>>>>>>>>>> - New and updated translations
> >>>>>>>>>>> - And more...
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> A summary of useful information can be found
in
> >> RELEASE-NOTES,
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>> list
> >>>>>>>>>>> of changes in CHANGES at the above artifact
distribution
> >> url, as
> >>>>>>>> well as
> >>>>>>>>>>> being included in the tarballs/zips.(zipballs?)
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Action Required:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Test the release and make it works on your
environment - at
> >>>>> least
> >>>>>>>>>> standard
> >>>>>>>>>>> configurations. Please go over the source
files and make sure
> >>>>> they
> >>>>>>>> don't
> >>>>>>>>>>> contain anything that cannot be released
under Apache Wave
> >> due
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>>>> legal
> >>>>>>>>>>> issues.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> This vote will close around 0000 GMT 5-th
May 2015.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1   Release it!
> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0   OK, but...
> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -0    OK, but you really should fix....
> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1    Definitely not because...
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
> >> 

Mime
View raw message