incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Christian Grobmeier" <grobme...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Wave 0.5 based on RC5
Date Tue, 12 Aug 2014 18:28:08 GMT
On 12 Aug 2014, at 9:49, Ali Lown wrote:
> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html
> Seems to suggest extending both license and notice as required?

Why is it required?

This says: 
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#redistribution
"If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its distribution, 
then any Derivative Works that You distribute must include a readable 
copy of the attribution notices contained within such NOTICE file"

As I understand it, our own license goes to license, and if
there is a notice file, then we attribute third parties there.

At the moment I don't see a requirement to add anything to the LICENSE 
file.

However its just my opinion and if you think it should be like that,
we can always ask the rest of the IPMC what they think. In addition I 
expect
other IPMC members will check these files in detail, so we'll surely 
find out about it.
And of course, we can highlight things we are uncertain of when we 
forward
the vote.

Regards,
Christian


>
> Ali
> On 12 Aug 2014 05:38, "Christian Grobmeier" <grobmeier@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> sorry for the delay!
>>
>> I meant: the LICENSE file should only contain the Apache license
>> used by this project. The NOTICE file can contain references to
>> licenses of other libs used by the project.
>> So far i haven't seen LICENSE files containing all licenses of
>> all dependencies et al
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Christian
>>
>> On 8 Aug 2014, at 10:35, Yuri Z wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Christian
>>> You mentioned that: "The LICENSE file in the bin dist contains 
>>> additional
>>> lines of text which should not be there. This is what belongs to a 
>>> NOTICE
>>> file."
>>> Can you please explain?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Christian Grobmeier <
>> grobmeier@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thats good then, thanks for letting me know.
>>>>
>>>> On 23 Jul 2014, at 22:59, Ali Lown wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The thumnbail_patterns files were fixed by Vicente back in 
>>>>> December.
>>>>> The curremt files are from the Humanity Project, a note was added 
>>>>> to
>>>> THANKS
>>>>> to Tango (who are behind them).
>>>>>
>>>>> The files themselves are public domain.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ali
>>>>> On 23 Jul 2014 21:37, "Yuri Z" <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for pointing out these issues Christian.
>>>>>> Basically, these files are generated, but since we dont want to 
>>>>>> make
>> the
>>>>>> project to depend on protobuff library, they are part of the 
>>>>>> source.
>>>>>> Anyway, i think we can add the headers.
>>>>>> Regarding images in thumbnail - i think we sorted out this issue.
>>>>>> I ll make fixes and create rc6.
>>>>>> On Jul 23, 2014 10:57 PM, "Christian Grobmeier" 
>>>>>> <grobmeier@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unfortunately I found some issues which should be solved before

>>>>>>> we
>> can
>>>>>>> release:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I found these file without headers. Many of them are generated,

>>>>>>> but I
>>>>>> found
>>>>>>> others in the same folders which were generated too and had a

>>>>>>> license
>>>>>>> header.
>>>>>>> So I think we can apply them here as well:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WaveClientRpc.java
>>>>>>> ProfilesProto
>>>>>>> SearchProto
>>>>>>> ProtoDeltaStoreData
>>>>>>> Rpc
>>>>>>> Extensions
>>>>>>> ClientServer
>>>>>>> Diff
>>>>>>> FederationErrorProto
>>>>>>> Proto
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Others:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> artifact-sign.sh
>>>>>>> eclipse-formatter-style.xml
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What are these files in thumbnails_patterns? They look binary,

>>>>>>> do we
>>>> have
>>>>>>> the permission to distribute them?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The NOTICE file needs an update to the current year - speaking

>>>>>>> of the
>>>> src
>>>>>>> dist, it looks correct (?) for the bin dist.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The LICENSE file in the bin dist contains additional lines of

>>>>>>> text
>>>> which
>>>>>>> should not be there. This is what belongs to a NOTICE file.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Basically my main blocker is the header license.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't know why files like LICENSE etc are different from the
>>>> packages.
>>>>>>> They should be the same.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I know its a lot of work, but can we fix these?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Probably there are other issues, but I hope you'll see my point.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 19 Jul 2014, at 19:12, Yuri Z wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> RC5 is now available for review.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Major changes in RC5:
>>>>>>>> - Added MongoDB based deltas store and migration tool for

>>>>>>>> deltas
>>>>>> migration
>>>>>>>> from file to mongo based store.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Added client/server profiling.
>>>>>>>> - Added Atmosphere framework as replacement of Socket.IO.
>>>>>>>> - Added alternative - Gmail style initials avatars.
>>>>>>>> - Decreased number of permutations in dev compilation and
added 
>>>>>>>> GWT
>>>>>>>> superdev mode.
>>>>>>>> - Upgraded the server to Jetty 9.1.1.
>>>>>>>> - Added JDK 7 compatibility.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Reminder: Major changes in RC4 included:
>>>>>>>> - More licensing fixes
>>>>>>>> - Federation works
>>>>>>>> - New and updated translations
>>>>>>>> - And more...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Artifacts can be found here:
>>>>>>>> *
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.5-incubating/
>>>>>>>> <
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.5-incubating/
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>> (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f >

>>>>>>>> $f.sha')
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is taken from branch
>>>>>>>> *https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
>>>>>>>> wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/wave-0.4-rc5
>>>>>>>> <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
>>>>>>>> wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/wave-0.4-rc5>*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A summary of useful information can be found in RELEASE-NOTES,

>>>>>>>> and a
>>>>>>>> list of changes in CHANGES at the above artifact distribution

>>>>>>>> url,
>> as
>>>>>>>> well as being included in the tarballs/zips.(zipballs?)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Action Required:*
>>>>>>>> *It is crucial to test these on some other machines and provide
>>>>>>>> **feedback.*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This vote will close around 0000 GMT 26-th July 2014.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1   Release it!
>>>>>>>> [ ] +0   OK, but...
>>>>>>>> [ ] -0    OK, but you really should fix....
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1    Definitely not because...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>>>>>>> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL
>>>>>>> @grobmeier
>>>>>>> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>>>> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL
>>>> @grobmeier
>>>> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
>>>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL
>> @grobmeier
>> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
>>


---
http://www.grobmeier.de
The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL
@grobmeier
GPG: 0xA5CC90DB

Mime
View raw message