incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Release
Date Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:23:26 GMT
@Ali another question - you mentioned that it is possible to put a file
into a folder at people.apache.org and make it available for other via web
interface. Is there some guide how to do this?


On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Yuri Zelikov <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok
> On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:42 PM, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > I ran it a while back, but things have changed, so I would suggest
> > rerunning.
> >
> > Ali
> > On 17 Jul 2014 17:40, "Yuri Zelikov" <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Do you think we should run it or we already got it covered?
> >> On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:38 PM, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >>> RAT, but it can be a bit overly sensitive.
> >>>
> >>> Ali
> >>> On 17 Jul 2014 17:37, "Yuri Z" <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Is there some tool to verify that all files have the licences?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Michael MacFadden <
> >>>> michael.macfadden@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> All,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Although I have been dormant.  I am willing to help out with the
> >> release
> >>>>> in any way possible.  If you need some one to go through the release
> >> and
> >>>>> test it.  Or post it up to he web site once we have it ready let
me
> >> know.
> >>>>> I havenĀ¹t helped out in a while, so I would love to contribute.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ~Michael
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 7/12/14, 6:05 AM, "Ali Lown" <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Yuri,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> AFAIK both of these can be TODOs can be removed now.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Ali
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 12 July 2014 14:01, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Ok, great. This is a great Wiki. I ll try to go the steps
and later
> >> to
> >>>>>>> add
> >>>>>>> a release job to jenkins so the release process will be
automated.
> >> Off
> >>>>>>> course if someone want to help with release stuff - it would
be
> great
> >>>> :)
> >>>>>>> The wiki contains two todos:
> >>>>>>> 1. ODO: Do we need Extension-Name, Implementation-Vendor-Id
as
> well?
> >>>>>>> 2. Check export status of any cryptographic dependencies.
(Unknown
> >>>>>>> currently whether we need an ECCN or not)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regarding the 2- I think we got rid of it, is it right?
> >>>>>>> Regarding 1 - @Ali can you comment?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Yuri,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I started writing up the 'procedure' here:
> >>>>>>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Release+Procedure
> >>>> It
> >>>>>>>> needs updating now that we use git rather than svn.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If we could get jenkins building the releases that would
be great!
> >>>>>>>> (wave-artifacts doesn't seem to be generating the src
releases?)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Once the artifacts are made (ant release, or equivalent),
then the
> >>>>>>>> next step is to manually verify the contents are as
expected, and
> to
> >>>>>>>> sign it.
> >>>>>>>> I have a very small script to sign all the files using
my key, and
> >> to
> >>>>>>>> generate the SHA512 sums for the files:
> >> http://pastebin.com/05wBkWd1
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Once that is done, send it to the wave list to vote
upon...
> >>>>>>>> Once that is done, send it to the incubator list to
vote upon...
> >>>>>>>> Once that is done, release! ;)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Ali
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 12 July 2014 13:21, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for update Ali.
> >>>>>>>>> I think the release is important to show that we
handled all the
> >>>>>>>> copyright
> >>>>>>>>> issues, so I would prefer just to release as is
and then add the
> >>>>>>>> patch
> >>>>>>>>> later.
> >>>>>>>>> Anyway, let's try to do the release stuff for rc
05. Are there
> any
> >>>>>>>> scripts
> >>>>>>>>> that should be run? What is the procedure?
> >>>>>>>>> By the way, I already added a Jenkins job to create
the release
> >>>>>>>> artifact
> >>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Wave/job/wave-artifacts/
> >>>>>>>>> So, if could to automate the licenses verification
and signing we
> >>>>>>>> could
> >>>>>>>>> release just by running the job in Jenkins...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> RC4 was merged back in to master around January,
and development
> >>>> has
> >>>>>>>>>> continued in master from there..
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I don't recall any major show stoppers with
RC4. A look at the
> >>>> vote
> >>>>>>>>>> thread suggests that the only problems left
to discuss were the
> >>>>>>>> images
> >>>>>>>>>> in thumbnail_patterns, for which we could find
no copyright
> >>>>>>>>>> assignment. But we fixed this problem in 48c3bc9,
by changing
> the
> >>>>>>>>>> thumbnails to some we could attribute.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On a meta level, the problem at the time was
that RC4 had a very
> >>>>>>>> poor
> >>>>>>>>>> vote turnout, disincentivizing further work.
> >>>>>>>>>> (And on a personal level, I ran out of time
I could put towards
> >>>>>>>> Wave)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I don't think there is anything stopping us
putting together RC5
> >>>>>>>> over
> >>>>>>>>>> this weekend.
> >>>>>>>>>> (Since we would want to take from current master,
a check of the
> >>>>>>>>>> licenses will be required to be redone).
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Is there interest in RC5?
> >>>>>>>>>> (And do we want to put Frank's fulltextsearch
patches in?)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>> Ali
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 12 July 2014 12:35, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> I think I merged the rc 0.4 into master
a while ago. But I
> don't
> >>>>>>>> remember
> >>>>>>>>>>> what were the issues that prevented from
us to release rc 0.4.
> >>>>>>>>>>> @Ali, so you remember what were the issues?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Christian
Grobmeier <
> >>>>>>>>>> grobmeier@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> before quite a while, we were discussing
a release. It's still
> >>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>>>> there,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> and I would like to know what the actual
problem is.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> As you know, releases are considered
a sign of a healthy
> >>>> project
> >>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> incubator.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> It's currently discussed within the
IPMC why projects which
> >>>> don't
> >>>>>>>> manage
> >>>>>>>>>>>> to make a release
> >>>>>>>>>>>> after a year should stay in the incubator.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Christian
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL
> >>>>>>>>>>>> @grobmeier
> >>>>>>>>>>>> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message