incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ali Lown <...@lown.me.uk>
Subject Re: Release
Date Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:27:42 GMT
The people.apache.org space I was using is just my 'personal' webspace.

You can put things in your public_html folder on that machine. (Ssh in as
you would expect).

Regards,
Ali
On 18 Jul 2014 10:23, "Yuri Z" <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:

> @Ali another question - you mentioned that it is possible to put a file
> into a folder at people.apache.org and make it available for other via web
> interface. Is there some guide how to do this?
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Yuri Zelikov <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Ok
> > On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:42 PM, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > I ran it a while back, but things have changed, so I would suggest
> > > rerunning.
> > >
> > > Ali
> > > On 17 Jul 2014 17:40, "Yuri Zelikov" <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Do you think we should run it or we already got it covered?
> > >> On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:38 PM, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> RAT, but it can be a bit overly sensitive.
> > >>>
> > >>> Ali
> > >>> On 17 Jul 2014 17:37, "Yuri Z" <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Is there some tool to verify that all files have the licences?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Michael MacFadden <
> > >>>> michael.macfadden@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> All,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Although I have been dormant.  I am willing to help out with
the
> > >> release
> > >>>>> in any way possible.  If you need some one to go through the
> release
> > >> and
> > >>>>> test it.  Or post it up to he web site once we have it ready
let me
> > >> know.
> > >>>>> I havenĀ¹t helped out in a while, so I would love to contribute.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> ~Michael
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 7/12/14, 6:05 AM, "Ali Lown" <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Yuri,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> AFAIK both of these can be TODOs can be removed now.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>> Ali
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 12 July 2014 14:01, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Ok, great. This is a great Wiki. I ll try to go the
steps and
> later
> > >> to
> > >>>>>>> add
> > >>>>>>> a release job to jenkins so the release process will
be
> automated.
> > >> Off
> > >>>>>>> course if someone want to help with release stuff -
it would be
> > great
> > >>>> :)
> > >>>>>>> The wiki contains two todos:
> > >>>>>>> 1. ODO: Do we need Extension-Name, Implementation-Vendor-Id
as
> > well?
> > >>>>>>> 2. Check export status of any cryptographic dependencies.
> (Unknown
> > >>>>>>> currently whether we need an ECCN or not)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Regarding the 2- I think we got rid of it, is it right?
> > >>>>>>> Regarding 1 - @Ali can you comment?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Yuri,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I started writing up the 'procedure' here:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Release+Procedure
> > >>>> It
> > >>>>>>>> needs updating now that we use git rather than
svn.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> If we could get jenkins building the releases that
would be
> great!
> > >>>>>>>> (wave-artifacts doesn't seem to be generating the
src releases?)
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Once the artifacts are made (ant release, or equivalent),
then
> the
> > >>>>>>>> next step is to manually verify the contents are
as expected,
> and
> > to
> > >>>>>>>> sign it.
> > >>>>>>>> I have a very small script to sign all the files
using my key,
> and
> > >> to
> > >>>>>>>> generate the SHA512 sums for the files:
> > >> http://pastebin.com/05wBkWd1
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Once that is done, send it to the wave list to
vote upon...
> > >>>>>>>> Once that is done, send it to the incubator list
to vote upon...
> > >>>>>>>> Once that is done, release! ;)
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Ali
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On 12 July 2014 13:21, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks for update Ali.
> > >>>>>>>>> I think the release is important to show that
we handled all
> the
> > >>>>>>>> copyright
> > >>>>>>>>> issues, so I would prefer just to release as
is and then add
> the
> > >>>>>>>> patch
> > >>>>>>>>> later.
> > >>>>>>>>> Anyway, let's try to do the release stuff for
rc 05. Are there
> > any
> > >>>>>>>> scripts
> > >>>>>>>>> that should be run? What is the procedure?
> > >>>>>>>>> By the way, I already added a Jenkins job to
create the release
> > >>>>>>>> artifact
> > >>>>>>>> -
> > >>>>>>>>>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Wave/job/wave-artifacts/
> > >>>>>>>>> So, if could to automate the licenses verification
and signing
> we
> > >>>>>>>> could
> > >>>>>>>>> release just by running the job in Jenkins...
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> RC4 was merged back in to master around
January, and
> development
> > >>>> has
> > >>>>>>>>>> continued in master from there..
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I don't recall any major show stoppers
with RC4. A look at the
> > >>>> vote
> > >>>>>>>>>> thread suggests that the only problems
left to discuss were
> the
> > >>>>>>>> images
> > >>>>>>>>>> in thumbnail_patterns, for which we could
find no copyright
> > >>>>>>>>>> assignment. But we fixed this problem in
48c3bc9, by changing
> > the
> > >>>>>>>>>> thumbnails to some we could attribute.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On a meta level, the problem at the time
was that RC4 had a
> very
> > >>>>>>>> poor
> > >>>>>>>>>> vote turnout, disincentivizing further
work.
> > >>>>>>>>>> (And on a personal level, I ran out of
time I could put
> towards
> > >>>>>>>> Wave)
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I don't think there is anything stopping
us putting together
> RC5
> > >>>>>>>> over
> > >>>>>>>>>> this weekend.
> > >>>>>>>>>> (Since we would want to take from current
master, a check of
> the
> > >>>>>>>>>> licenses will be required to be redone).
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Is there interest in RC5?
> > >>>>>>>>>> (And do we want to put Frank's fulltextsearch
patches in?)
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>>>> Ali
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On 12 July 2014 12:35, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I think I merged the rc 0.4 into master
a while ago. But I
> > don't
> > >>>>>>>> remember
> > >>>>>>>>>>> what were the issues that prevented
from us to release rc
> 0.4.
> > >>>>>>>>>>> @Ali, so you remember what were the
issues?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Christian
Grobmeier <
> > >>>>>>>>>> grobmeier@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> before quite a while, we were discussing
a release. It's
> still
> > >>>>>>>> not
> > >>>>>>>>>> there,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> and I would like to know what the
actual problem is.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> As you know, releases are considered
a sign of a healthy
> > >>>> project
> > >>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> incubator.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> It's currently discussed within
the IPMC why projects which
> > >>>> don't
> > >>>>>>>> manage
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> to make a release
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> after a year should stay in the
incubator.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Christian
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> ---
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> @grobmeier
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message