incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Wave, article on why wave was not enough to use
Date Tue, 04 Feb 2014 11:53:56 GMT
Yep, Wave is not just a client, but a very rich platform for near real time
apps that also includes a rich text client editor. And it was destined to
be federated, very much like smtp/xmpp.
On Feb 4, 2014 1:32 PM, "Thomas Wrobel" <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think the "meta problem" was because Google focused on Wave too much as a
> single app, rather then a protocol.
> The failings of the single client thus brought the whole thing down.
>
> Well, that and over expectations, buggy early release, confusing naming....
>
> ~~~
> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>
>
> On 4 February 2014 08:57, Basavaraj <rajiff@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello All
> >
> > found this interesting review about google wave and its cons
> >
> >
> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2010/08/google-wave-why-we-didnt-use-it/
> >
> >
> > wanted to share and check are there any effort to fix any one those from
> > this article
> >
> > may be fixing them may make google wave gain what it deserves
> >
> > ~Basavaraj
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message