incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Setting up Wave for client development (my experience setting up on WindowsXP)
Date Wed, 04 Dec 2013 19:26:20 GMT
Note#5:

oh, and additionally there was a few problems expanding license files;

"    [unzip] Unable to expand to file
C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\staging\license\
LICENSE.dom-documentation.txt
    [unzip] Unable to expand to file
C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\staging\license\
NOTICE
    [unzip] Unable to expand to file
C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\staging\license\
README.sax.txt
    [unzip] Unable to expand to file
C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\staging\license\
README.dom.txt
    [unzip] Unable to expand to file
C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\staging\license\
LICENSE.sax.txt
    [unzip] Unable to expand to file
C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\staging\license\
LICENSE.dom-software.txt
    [unzip] Unable to expand to file
C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\staging\license\
LICENSE"

~~~
Thomas & Bertines online review show:
http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)


On 4 December 2013 20:24, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:

> "BUILD SUCCESSFUL
> Total time: 312 minutes 41 seconds"
>
> Ok, after giving Oracle my "totally real" address and "totally real" phone
> number I got JDK6 and now Ant is building just fine.
> After 5-6 hours its done.
> (hours? is that normal? my machines not that great but still...)
>
> Suggestion;
> Would it be possible to have a virtual machine with everything set up
> already? or is there technical/license reasons for that to be unsuitable?
>
> Query:
> Can Wave be updated to JDK7? is there big issues holding it back ? Or is
> there more open alternatives we can use instead - one that doesn't require
> handing over personal details to a company?
>
> --
> If we want to get more people into Wave development, at my experience here
> is the norm, then these might be significant issues. Possibly more-so then
> Apache vs Git.
>
> Regardless, I'll continue my experiences trying to get started. ho hum.
>
>
>
>
>
> ~~~
> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>
>
> On 2 December 2013 23:25, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> bah...need to sign up to Oracle just to download JDK6 now? seriously >_<
>> This is the sort of thing that puts people off :-/
>> *files it under "do tommorow"
>>
>> ~~~
>> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
>> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
>> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>>
>>
>> On 2 December 2013 22:10, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> ah...no...a fresh download of jdk7
>>> I'll downgrade.
>>>
>>> ~~~
>>> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
>>> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
>>> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2 December 2013 21:39, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are you definitely using jdk6?
>>>> On 2 Dec 2013 20:25, "Thomas Wrobel" <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Thanks - I'll use that one as a reference now, but I'll aim to
>>>> edit/update
>>>> > the other one (as that seems a bit more "friendly" for someone getting
>>>> > started).
>>>> > ---
>>>> > Notes #4:
>>>> > ant get-third-party is needed before running ant.
>>>> > --- Stuck #4:
>>>> > Build error;
>>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave>ant Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml
>>>> > check-test-dependencies: init-logging: [mkdir] Created dir:
>>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\logs [echo] Logging to
>>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave/build/logs/build_2013-11-29_17-48-35 .log init:
>>>> > [mkdir] Created dir: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto [mkdir] Created
>>>> dir:
>>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\messages [mkdir] Created dir:
>>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\src [mkdir] Created dir:
>>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\test [mkdir] Created dir:
>>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\coverage [mkdir] Created dir:
>>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\dist [mkdir] Created dir:
>>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\staging [mkdir] Created dir:
>>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\dep [mkdir] Created dir:
>>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\test_out compile-proto-dep: compile-proto:
>>>> [javac]
>>>> > Compiling 12 source files to C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto [javac]
>>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\attachment\Attac
>>>> > hmentProto.java:344: warning: [static] static method should be
>>>> qualified by
>>>> > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac]
>>>> > super.addAll(values, result.attachment_); [javac] ^ [javac] error:
>>>> warnings
>>>> > found and -Werror specified [javac]
>>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\common\comms\Wav
>>>> > eClientRpc.java:990: warning: [static] static method should be
>>>> qualified by
>>>> > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac]
>>>> > super.addAll(values, result.waveletIdPrefix_); [javac] ^
>>>> > ...(and a lot of similiar warnings ending in a ...
>>>> >
>>>> >     [javac]         super.addAll(values, result.removedContributor_);
>>>> >     [javac]              ^
>>>> >     [javac] 1 error
>>>> >     [javac] 40 warnings
>>>> >
>>>> > BUILD FAILED
>>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:100: The following error occurred while
>>>> > executing
>>>> >  this line:
>>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build-macros.xml:68: Compile failed; see the
>>>> compiler
>>>> > error
>>>> >  output for details.
>>>> >
>>>> > Total time: 12 seconds
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > ~~~
>>>> > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
>>>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
>>>> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On 2 December 2013 21:03, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > I think the most up to date installation guide is the README file
-
>>>> > > https://github.com/apache/wave/blob/trunk/README
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > Stuck #3:
>>>> > > > "ANT"
>>>> > > > Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > check-test-dependencies:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > BUILD FAILED
>>>> > > > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:259: You need to execute the
>>>> > > get-third-party
>>>> > > > targ
>>>> > > > et to download dependencies required for tests compilation,
i.e.
>>>> ant
>>>> > > > get-third-p
>>>> > > > arty. third_party/test/emma/emma_ant.jar
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > ~~~
>>>> > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
>>>> > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
>>>> > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > On 2 December 2013 15:13, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > >  Note #2:
>>>> > > > > Should be made clear your need JDK installed, with a
link to
>>>> the Java
>>>> > > > > site. (not just JRE).
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > Note #3:
>>>> > > > > Should be clarified that the ANT command doesn't work
in XP
>>>> just by
>>>> > > > adding
>>>> > > > > its path to a "ANT" system variable.
>>>> > > > > The path to ANT has to be added to the already existing
PATH
>>>> system
>>>> > > > > variable. (and it should be just to the "bin" directory,
the
>>>> \ant at
>>>> > > the
>>>> > > > > end shouldn't be there.
>>>> > > > > People can use "echo %PATH%" to check its added ok.
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > (I will start expanding/changing the guide as soon as
I have
>>>> write
>>>> > > > > permission, although I will post changes first here as
well, in
>>>> case
>>>> > I
>>>> > > > have
>>>> > > > > got something wrong or its specific to XP and Win7 is
treated
>>>> > > > differently)
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > ~~~
>>>> > > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
>>>> > > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
>>>> > > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > On 2 December 2013 02:36, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
wrote:
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >> > For the ant, do I just go for the route (that
is the "wave"
>>>> > > directory
>>>> > > > >> > rather then the  "wave-protocol" one that doesn't
exist now?
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >> Yes.
>>>> > > > >>
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message