incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Setting up Wave for client development (my experience setting up on WindowsXP)
Date Wed, 04 Dec 2013 22:08:54 GMT
Just checking I am not doing something stupid here; If I did have editing
access how would I edit it?  I am not seeing a "edit" button on my screen
or on the dropdown under Tools.

~~~
Thomas & Bertines online review show:
http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)


On 4 December 2013 22:56, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:

> If you already have wiki access, then you should be able to edit it.
> If not, poke Michael Macfadden.
>
> On 4 December 2013 21:55, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:
> > ah...ok.
> > If someone could give me editing ability's over that getting started
> guide
> > then. Doesn't sound like I could make it worse at this point ;)
> >
> > ~~~
> > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> >
> >
> > On 4 December 2013 22:40, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> The client console does not exist anymore.
> >> It was removed the code base (at least) two years ago.
> >>
> >> Ali
> >>
> >> On 4 December 2013 21:38, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Ok, just checking the output of the build.
> >> >
> >> > I have a "dist" folder with:
> >> >
> >> > pst.jar
> >> > wave-in-a-box-server-0.4-incubating.jar
> >> > wave-in-a-box-export-import-0.4-incubating.jar
> >> >
> >> > The old guide (
> >> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Building+Wave+in+a+Box#
> >> )
> >> > makes reference to
> >> >
> >> > waveinabox-client-console-0.3.jar
> >> > waveinabox-server-0.3.jar
> >> >
> >> > in a "wave-protocol" directory. Neither the directory or those files
> >> exist.
> >> > I assume  "waveinabox-server-0.3.jar" is now called
> >> >  "wave-in-a-box-server-0.4-incubating.jar"
> >> > But is "waveinabox-client-console-0.3.jar" now
> >> >  "wave-in-a-box-export-import-0.4-incubating.jar" ?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ~~~
> >> > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> >> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> >> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 4 December 2013 21:50, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Might be worth at some point looking into alternatives for
> >> multi-language
> >> >> support?
> >> >> Should be possible without multiplying compile times.
> >> >> I'll have to look into it once I am up and running.
> >> >>
> >> >> ~~~
> >> >> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> >> >> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> >> >> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On 4 December 2013 21:33, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Permutation is not only per browser, it is also per language and
I
> >> think
> >> >>> WIAB supports 4 languages.
> >> >>> Anyway, it is very strange it took 4 hours, probably 2 GB is too
> >> little,
> >> >>> you ll need about 4 GB.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com
> >
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > 32??? There isnt 32 different browser engines is there :?
> >> >>> > My own GWT projects, (using 2.5.1) use 7 at most. (and even
that
> >> should
> >> >>> go
> >> >>> > down in newer versions as Opera phase's out Presto.)
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > It wasn't GWT permutations taking the bulk of the time  anyway,
> mind
> >> >>> you -
> >> >>> > it seemed to mostly be the testing and (strangely) expanding
JAR
> >> files.
> >> >>> > That was just my perception though. Certainly before it got
to
> >> >>> > "compile-gwt:" took at least 4 hours.
> >> >>> > Would the log help here?
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > My machine is a 4200 dual core Amd. Not much ram (2GB), was
> running
> >> >>> chrome
> >> >>> > at the same time, but not doing anything intensive. I wouldn't
be
> >> >>> surprised
> >> >>> > if my machine is to blame here, but I cant think why it would
be
> this
> >> >>> > different.
> >> >>> > ---
> >> >>> > Anyway, dinner now, then back to poking at things.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > ~~~
> >> >>> > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> >> >>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> >> >>> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > On 4 December 2013 20:59, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > > We have 32 GWT permutations the moment, we used to have
only
> 4...
> >> Some
> >> >>> > last
> >> >>> > > changes caused this increase... We need to be more cautious
> about
> >> >>> > updating
> >> >>> > > GWT client code.
> >> >>> > > I tried
> >> >>> > > ant clean dist-server compile-gwt test
> >> >>> > > It took me about 16 minutes. If you tried the default
target
> which
> >> >>> also
> >> >>> > > includes running tests then it could take about 6 minutes
more.
> >> >>> > > So max 21 minutes on 2-core laptop. This is for the full
prod
> >> build,
> >> >>> if
> >> >>> > you
> >> >>> > > run the server from compiled source with dev GWT setting(only
2
> >> >>> > > permutations) then it takes only a few minutes, or even
less.
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > Basically running wave is simple like:
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > git clone git://git.apache.org/wave.git wave
> >> >>> > > cd wave
> >> >>> > > cp server.config.example server.config
> >> >>> > > ant dist-server compile-gwt run-server
> >> >>> > > Open the browser at http://localhost:9898
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
> wrote:
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > > > "BUILD SUCCESSFUL
> >> >>> > > > > Total time: 312 minutes 41 seconds"
> >> >>> > > >
> >> >>> > > > Err.. it takes ~5 minutes on my dev machine! Is
this a single
> >> core
> >> >>> vm,
> >> >>> > > > doing lots of swapping, and with shared io?
> >> >>> > > >
> >> >>> > > > > Suggestion;
> >> >>> > > > > Would it be possible to have a virtual machine
with
> everything
> >> >>> set up
> >> >>> > > > > already? or is there technical/license reasons
for that to
> be
> >> >>> > > unsuitable?
> >> >>> > > >
> >> >>> > > > I suspect this would be difficult. (And you don't
really want
> to
> >> be
> >> >>> in
> >> >>> > a
> >> >>> > > > VM).
> >> >>> > > >
> >> >>> > > > > Query:
> >> >>> > > > > Can Wave be updated to JDK7? is there big issues
holding it
> >> back
> >> >>> ? Or
> >> >>> > > is
> >> >>> > > > > there more open alternatives we can use instead
- one that
> >> doesn't
> >> >>> > > > require
> >> >>> > > > > handing over personal details to a company?
> >> >>> > > >
> >> >>> > > > (OpenJDK 1.6 works fine, so...)
> >> >>> > > >
> >> >>> > > > This is quite difficult to do for the codebase.
You would also
> >> need
> >> >>> to
> >> >>> > > > upgrade all the third-party components.
> >> >>> > > >
> >> >>> > > > Please continue to provide feedback.
> >> >>> > > >
> >> >>> > > > Thanks.
> >> >>> > > > Ali
> >> >>> > > >
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message