incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Setting up Wave for client development (my experience setting up on WindowsXP)
Date Wed, 04 Dec 2013 21:38:26 GMT
Ok, just checking the output of the build.

I have a "dist" folder with:

pst.jar
wave-in-a-box-server-0.4-incubating.jar
wave-in-a-box-export-import-0.4-incubating.jar

The old guide (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Building+Wave+in+a+Box#)
makes reference to

waveinabox-client-console-0.3.jar
waveinabox-server-0.3.jar

in a "wave-protocol" directory. Neither the directory or those files exist.
I assume  "waveinabox-server-0.3.jar" is now called
 "wave-in-a-box-server-0.4-incubating.jar"
But is "waveinabox-client-console-0.3.jar" now
 "wave-in-a-box-export-import-0.4-incubating.jar" ?


~~~
Thomas & Bertines online review show:
http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)


On 4 December 2013 21:50, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:

> Might be worth at some point looking into alternatives for multi-language
> support?
> Should be possible without multiplying compile times.
> I'll have to look into it once I am up and running.
>
> ~~~
> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>
>
> On 4 December 2013 21:33, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Permutation is not only per browser, it is also per language and I think
>> WIAB supports 4 languages.
>> Anyway, it is very strange it took 4 hours, probably 2 GB is too little,
>> you ll need about 4 GB.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > 32??? There isnt 32 different browser engines is there :?
>> > My own GWT projects, (using 2.5.1) use 7 at most. (and even that should
>> go
>> > down in newer versions as Opera phase's out Presto.)
>> >
>> > It wasn't GWT permutations taking the bulk of the time  anyway, mind
>> you -
>> > it seemed to mostly be the testing and (strangely) expanding JAR files.
>> > That was just my perception though. Certainly before it got to
>> > "compile-gwt:" took at least 4 hours.
>> > Would the log help here?
>> >
>> > My machine is a 4200 dual core Amd. Not much ram (2GB), was running
>> chrome
>> > at the same time, but not doing anything intensive. I wouldn't be
>> surprised
>> > if my machine is to blame here, but I cant think why it would be this
>> > different.
>> > ---
>> > Anyway, dinner now, then back to poking at things.
>> >
>> >
>> > ~~~
>> > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
>> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>> >
>> >
>> > On 4 December 2013 20:59, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > We have 32 GWT permutations the moment, we used to have only 4... Some
>> > last
>> > > changes caused this increase... We need to be more cautious about
>> > updating
>> > > GWT client code.
>> > > I tried
>> > > ant clean dist-server compile-gwt test
>> > > It took me about 16 minutes. If you tried the default target which
>> also
>> > > includes running tests then it could take about 6 minutes more.
>> > > So max 21 minutes on 2-core laptop. This is for the full prod build,
>> if
>> > you
>> > > run the server from compiled source with dev GWT setting(only 2
>> > > permutations) then it takes only a few minutes, or even less.
>> > >
>> > > Basically running wave is simple like:
>> > >
>> > > git clone git://git.apache.org/wave.git wave
>> > > cd wave
>> > > cp server.config.example server.config
>> > > ant dist-server compile-gwt run-server
>> > > Open the browser at http://localhost:9898
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > > "BUILD SUCCESSFUL
>> > > > > Total time: 312 minutes 41 seconds"
>> > > >
>> > > > Err.. it takes ~5 minutes on my dev machine! Is this a single core
>> vm,
>> > > > doing lots of swapping, and with shared io?
>> > > >
>> > > > > Suggestion;
>> > > > > Would it be possible to have a virtual machine with everything
>> set up
>> > > > > already? or is there technical/license reasons for that to be
>> > > unsuitable?
>> > > >
>> > > > I suspect this would be difficult. (And you don't really want to be
>> in
>> > a
>> > > > VM).
>> > > >
>> > > > > Query:
>> > > > > Can Wave be updated to JDK7? is there big issues holding it back
>> ? Or
>> > > is
>> > > > > there more open alternatives we can use instead - one that doesn't
>> > > > require
>> > > > > handing over personal details to a company?
>> > > >
>> > > > (OpenJDK 1.6 works fine, so...)
>> > > >
>> > > > This is quite difficult to do for the codebase. You would also need
>> to
>> > > > upgrade all the third-party components.
>> > > >
>> > > > Please continue to provide feedback.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks.
>> > > > Ali
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message