incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Setting up Wave for client development (my experience setting up on WindowsXP)
Date Thu, 12 Dec 2013 01:04:24 GMT
(just duplicating the information in the doc for my future reference;)

Eclipse Run Configuration

Main class:
org.waveprotocol.box.server.ServerMain

VM arguements:
-Djava.util.logging.config.file=wiab-logging.conf
-Djava.security.auth.login.config=jaas.config
-Dwave.server.config=server.config


Then use the IP: http://127.0.0.1:9898
(or whatever you see in the eclipse log when you run)


~~~
Thomas & Bertines online review show:
http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)


On 12 December 2013 01:54, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok, took a few days off to work on company project (a adventure game
> engine programmed completely in gwt as it happens).
>
> Looking over that Google Doc, I copyed the settings into eclipse's run
> options. However, on running I got a few errors;
>
> Dec 10, 2013 7:34:13 AM
> org.waveprotocol.box.server.waveserver.CertificateManagerImpl <init>
> WARNING: ** SIGNATURE VERIFICATION DISABLED ** see flag
> "waveserver_disable_verification"
> Dec 10, 2013 7:34:14 AM
> org.waveprotocol.box.server.waveserver.WaveServerImpl <init>
> INFO: Wave Server configured to host local domains: [local.net]
> Dec 10, 2013 7:34:14 AM org.waveprotocol.box.server.rpc.ServerRpcProvider
> parseAddressList
> WARNING: Ignoring duplicate address in http addresses list: Duplicate
> entry 'localhost:9898' resolved to 127.0.0.1
> Dec 10, 2013 7:34:17 AM com.google.gson.ParameterizedTypeHandlerMap
> register
>  WARNING: Overriding the existing type handler for class
> com.google.wave.api.Element
> Dec 10, 2013 7:34:17 AM com.google.gson.ParameterizedTypeHandlerMap
> register
> WARNING: Overriding the existing type handler for class
> com.google.wave.api.Element
> Dec 10, 2013 7:34:17 AM com.google.gson.ParameterizedTypeHandlerMap
> register
> WARNING: Overriding the existing type handler for class
> com.google.wave.api.Attachment
> Dec 10, 2013 7:34:17 AM com.google.gson.ParameterizedTypeHandlerMap
> register
> WARNING: Overriding the existing type handler for class
> com.google.wave.api.Attachment
> Dec 10, 2013 7:34:21 AM org.waveprotocol.box.server.ServerMain run
> INFO: Starting server
> 2013-12-10 07:34:22.140:INFO:oejs.Server:jetty-8.1.1.v20120215
> 2013-12-10 07:34:22.875:INFO:oejsh.ContextHandler:started
> o.e.j.w.WebAppContext{/,[file:/C:/TomsProjects/wave/war/]}
> 2013-12-10 07:34:22.875:INFO:oejsh.ContextHandler:started
> o.e.j.w.WebAppContext{/,[file:/C:/TomsProjects/wave/war/]}
> 2013-12-10 07:34:22.875:INFO:oejsh.ContextHandler:started
> o.e.j.w.WebAppContext{/,[file:/C:/TomsProjects/wave/war/]}
> Dec 10, 2013 7:34:24 AM
> org.waveprotocol.box.server.ServerMain$GadgetProxyServlet <init>
> INFO: Starting GadgetProxyServlet for gmodules.com:80
> 2013-12-10 07:34:25.250:INFO:oejsKwbs.ServerMain$GadgetProxyServlet,
> annotation=[none]]:Key[type=org.waveprotocol.box.server.ServerMain$GadgetProxyServlet,
> annotation=[none]] @ /gadgets to http://gmodules.com:80/gadgets
> Dec 10, 2013 7:34:25 AM
> org.waveprotocol.box.server.rpc.AbstractWaveSocketIOServlet init
> INFO: Transport handlers loaded: {websocket=class
> com.glines.socketio.server.transport.jetty.JettyWebSocketTransportHandler,
> flashsocket=class
> com.glines.socketio.server.transport.jetty.JettyWebSocketTransportHandler,
> htmlfile=class
> com.glines.socketio.server.transport.jetty.JettyContinuationTransportHandler,
> jsonp-polling=class
> com.glines.socketio.server.transport.jetty.JettyContinuationTransportHandler,
> xhr-multipart=class
> com.glines.socketio.server.transport.jetty.JettyContinuationTransportHandler,
> xhr-polling=class
> com.glines.socketio.server.transport.jetty.JettyContinuationTransportHandler}
> Dec 10, 2013 7:34:25 AM
> org.waveprotocol.box.server.rpc.AbstractWaveSocketIOServlet init
> INFO: Transports loaded: [xhr-polling, xhr-multipart, jsonp-polling,
> websocket, flashsocket, htmlfile]
> 2013-12-10 07:34:25.968:INFO:oejs.AbstractConnector:Started
> SelectChannelConnector@127.0.0.1:9898
>
>
> --
> Despite these, I think its working. At least "127.0.0.1:9898" in chrome
> pops up a page with "*Welcome to Wave in a Box* @local.net" and a login
> screen. Could it be? can I finally be ready to start poking at code, rather
> then configuration? I hope so ;)
>
> So, I guess next question; whats the default logins or how do I set them?
> Does registration work while its running?
>
>
>
> ~~~
> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>
>
> On 8 December 2013 02:05, Frank R. <renfeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> That's good. We didn't lose anything. I thought I had attached the
>> screenshots of how to config Eclipse to run/debug Wave in a Box. But, I
>> embedded them in the Google Doc instead. wave-dev-on-cinnamon - Google
>> Drive<
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iGFLmAzi3SaEH0J6SNlaq6wubesRWlO2A8bvqxPp-p4/edit#
>> >
>> .
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I can see screenshots, at least, some. Regarding compile times, java
>> > compliance level and the compile errors if you dont set it.
>> >
>> > ~~~
>> > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
>> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>> >
>> >
>> > On 7 December 2013 23:49, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Attachments are dropped by the list.
>> > >
>> > > Ali
>> > > On 7 Dec 2013 22:28, "Frank R." <renfeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Fantastic work there.
>> > > > > For the moment, I am going to continue trying to set it up
>> properly -
>> > > and
>> > > > > making notes to update/clarify the guide as appropriate, but
its
>> good
>> > > to
>> > > > > have that as a fallback.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Currently still trying to get the client running;
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >>you need to create a debug/run configuration with arguments
set
>> > > > properly.
>> > > > > >>you can find the arguments by reading run.sh
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I assume you mean "run-server.sh" (or-import or -export). I don't
>> see
>> > > > just
>> > > > > a "run.sh".
>> > > > >
>> > > > Sorry for the typo. run-server.sh
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > Then again, I couldn't find any obvious arguments for the client
>> in
>> > > those
>> > > > > files either.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > If anyone here is using eclipse could give me a screenshot of
>> their
>> > run
>> > > > > settings?
>> > > > >
>> > > > Can you see the screenshots attached to my previous emails? Can
>> anyone?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Alternatively, just let me know what the html file is the
>> webclient
>> > is
>> > > > > supposed to be using as thats what it doesnt seem to know.
>> > > Overall.html?
>> > > > > Index.html? frame.html?
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > ~~~
>> > > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
>> > > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
>> > > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 7 December 2013 12:25, Frank R. <renfeng.cn@gmail.com>
wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Here is the OVA ready for downloading.
>> > > > > >  wave-dev-on-cinnamon.ova<
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_OYKagpJexmdG5QYzhZeC1QNTg/edit?usp=drive_web
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Fleeky Flanco <fleeky@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > frank,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > thats pretty awesome, my only question is why you used
LM 13
>> and
>> > > not
>> > > > > say
>> > > > > > a
>> > > > > > > debian cmd line only distro?
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > Because, it would be a development box with JDK, Ant, Eclipse,
>> > Solr,
>> > > > and
>> > > > > > source code preinstalled and ready to use, i.e. ready for
a
>> > developer
>> > > > to
>> > > > > > start in a matter of seconds. It's for you to start playing
with
>> > the
>> > > > > code,
>> > > > > > rather than simply a demo server.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > either way nice work :)
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Frank R. <
>> renfeng.cn@gmail.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I've created a vm. Now, I'm uploading it to Google
Drive for
>> > > > sharing.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Here is the log of how I made it.
>> > > > > > > >  wave-dev-on-cinnamon<
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iGFLmAzi3SaEH0J6SNlaq6wubesRWlO2A8bvqxPp-p4/edit?usp=drive_web
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Frank R. <
>> renfeng.cn@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Thomas Wrobel
<
>> > > > darkflame@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > >wrote:
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>> "BUILD SUCCESSFUL
>> > > > > > > >>> Total time: 312 minutes 41 seconds"
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>> Ok, after giving Oracle my "totally real"
address and
>> > "totally
>> > > > > real"
>> > > > > > > >>> phone
>> > > > > > > >>> number I got JDK6 and now Ant is building
just fine.
>> > > > > > > >>> After 5-6 hours its done.
>> > > > > > > >>> (hours? is that normal? my machines not
that great but
>> > > still...)
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >> What is the configuration of your PC?
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> It took me 3 minutes 26 seconds to compile
gwt. You can
>> read
>> > > more
>> > > > > > > details
>> > > > > > > >> in a log for how I explored the build process
on Linux Mint
>> > 13 -
>> > > > > > Making
>> > > > > > > >> of Start your own Wave in a Box - Google Drive<
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uFzLD6gyY-L5egbztn9FFJjoyWvf3uO3AYnJoSMiTis/edit#
>> > > > > > > >.
>> > > > > > > >> And the slides, Start your own Wave in a Box
- Google
>> Drive<
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1k2KqC_h0cU_7Xpgfya8W2B2REkxb_YsQQWL5zBGE-ac/pub?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000
>> > > > > > > >.
>> > > > > > > >> Hope that will help.
>> > > > > > > >>      [java]    Compile of permutations succeeded
>> > > > > > > >>      [java] Linking into /tmp/wave/war/webclient
>> > > > > > > >>      [java]    Link succeeded
>> > > > > > > >>      [java]    Compilation succeeded -- 204.776s
>> > > > > > > >>     [touch] Creating /tmp/wave/build/dep/compile-gwt
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> BUILD SUCCESSFUL
>> > > > > > > >> Total time: 3 minutes 26 seconds
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>> Suggestion;
>> > > > > > > >>> Would it be possible to have a virtual
machine with
>> > everything
>> > > > set
>> > > > > up
>> > > > > > > >>> already? or is there technical/license
reasons for that
>> to be
>> > > > > > > unsuitable?
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >> I can do that by creating a virtual box image,
and
>> exporting
>> > it
>> > > as
>> > > > > OVA
>> > > > > > > >> file - Open Virtualization Archive, the single-file
>> version of
>> > > an
>> > > > > Open
>> > > > > > > >> Virtualization Format<
>> > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Virtualization_Format
>> >image.
>> > > It'll
>> > > > > > > resemble my Linux Mint box.
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>> Query:
>> > > > > > > >>> Can Wave be updated to JDK7? is there
big issues holding
>> it
>> > > back
>> > > > ?
>> > > > > Or
>> > > > > > > is
>> > > > > > > >>> there more open alternatives we can use
instead - one that
>> > > > doesn't
>> > > > > > > >>> require
>> > > > > > > >>> handing over personal details to a company?
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> You can have JDK7 to compile and run Wave
in a Box. I guess
>> > the
>> > > > > trick
>> > > > > > > >> should be that compiler compliance level must
be 1.6. I
>> used
>> > to
>> > > be
>> > > > > > > troubled
>> > > > > > > >> by the problem occasionally. I need to verify
that.
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> Now, I have both 7 and 6 on my Windows 7 box.
>> > > > > > > >> [image: Inline image 1]
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> I have the runtime as Java 6. I don't know
how I get such
>> > > settings
>> > > > > > after
>> > > > > > > >> upgrading JRE and JDK several times, and removing
obsolete
>> > > > versions.
>> > > > > > > >> [image: Inline image 2]
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> However, my Ant is running on Java 7. I can
have a
>> > > > clean-and-release
>> > > > > > > >> build.
>> > > > > > > >> [image: Inline image 3]
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> When I have Wave in a Box loaded in Eclipse,
I have to make
>> > sure
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > > >> compiler compliance level to be 1.6.
>> > > > > > > >> [image: Inline image 5]
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >> Or else, I'll have a bunch of compile errors.
>> > > > > > > >> [image: Inline image 4]
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>> --
>> > > > > > > >>> If we want to get more people into Wave
development, at my
>> > > > > experience
>> > > > > > > >>> here
>> > > > > > > >>> is the norm, then these might be significant
issues.
>> Possibly
>> > > > > more-so
>> > > > > > > >>> then
>> > > > > > > >>> Apache vs Git.
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>> Regardless, I'll continue my experiences
trying to get
>> > started.
>> > > > ho
>> > > > > > hum.
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>> ~~~
>> > > > > > > >>> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
>> > > > > > > >>> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
>> > > > > > > >>> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent
about it :)
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>> On 2 December 2013 23:25, Thomas Wrobel
<
>> darkflame@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>> > bah...need to sign up to Oracle just
to download JDK6
>> now?
>> > > > > > seriously
>> > > > > > > >>> >_<
>> > > > > > > >>> > This is the sort of thing that puts
people off :-/
>> > > > > > > >>> > *files it under "do tommorow"
>> > > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > > >>> > ~~~
>> > > > > > > >>> > Thomas & Bertines online review
show:
>> > > > > > > >>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
>> > > > > > > >>> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent
about it :)
>> > > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > > >>> > On 2 December 2013 22:10, Thomas
Wrobel <
>> > darkflame@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > > >>> >> ah...no...a fresh download of
jdk7
>> > > > > > > >>> >> I'll downgrade.
>> > > > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > > > >>> >> ~~~
>> > > > > > > >>> >> Thomas & Bertines online
review show:
>> > > > > > > >>> >> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
>> > > > > > > >>> >> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent
about it :)
>> > > > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > > > >>> >> On 2 December 2013 21:39, Ali
Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> Are you definitely using
jdk6?
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> On 2 Dec 2013 20:25, "Thomas
Wrobel" <
>> > darkflame@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>>
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > Thanks - I'll use that
one as a reference now, but
>> I'll
>> > > aim
>> > > > > to
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> edit/update
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > the other one (as that
seems a bit more "friendly"
>> for
>> > > > > someone
>> > > > > > > >>> getting
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > started).
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > ---
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > Notes #4:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > ant get-third-party
is needed before running ant.
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > --- Stuck #4:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > Build error;
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave>ant
Buildfile:
>> > > > > > > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > check-test-dependencies:
init-logging: [mkdir]
>> Created
>> > > dir:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\logs
[echo] Logging to
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >
>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave/build/logs/build_2013-11-29_17-48-35
>> > > > > .log
>> > > > > > > >>> init:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > [mkdir] Created dir:
>> C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto
>> > > > [mkdir]
>> > > > > > > >>> Created
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> dir:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\messages
[mkdir] Created
>> > dir:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\src
[mkdir] Created dir:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\test
[mkdir] Created dir:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\coverage
[mkdir] Created
>> > dir:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\dist
[mkdir] Created dir:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\staging
[mkdir] Created
>> dir:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\dep
[mkdir] Created dir:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\test_out
compile-proto-dep:
>> > > > > compile-proto:
>> > > > > > > >>> [javac]
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > Compiling 12 source
files to
>> > > > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto
>> > > > > > > >>> [javac]
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > >
>> C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\attachment\Attac
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > hmentProto.java:344:
warning: [static] static method
>> > > should
>> > > > > be
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> qualified by
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > type name, Builder,
instead of by an expression
>> [javac]
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > super.addAll(values,
result.attachment_); [javac] ^
>> > > [javac]
>> > > > > > > error:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> warnings
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > found and -Werror specified
[javac]
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > >
>> C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\common\comms\Wav
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > eClientRpc.java:990:
warning: [static] static method
>> > > should
>> > > > > be
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> qualified by
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > type name, Builder,
instead of by an expression
>> [javac]
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > super.addAll(values,
result.waveletIdPrefix_);
>> [javac]
>> > ^
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > ...(and a lot of similiar
warnings ending in a ...
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >     [javac]        
super.addAll(values,
>> > > > > > > >>> result.removedContributor_);
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >     [javac]        
     ^
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >     [javac] 1 error
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >     [javac] 40 warnings
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > BUILD FAILED
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:100:
The following
>> error
>> > > > > > occurred
>> > > > > > > >>> while
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > executing
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >  this line:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build-macros.xml:68:
Compile
>> > failed;
>> > > > see
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> compiler
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > error
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >  output for details.
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > Total time: 12 seconds
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > ~~~
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > Thomas & Bertines
online review show:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > Try it! You might even
feel ambivalent about it :)
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > On 2 December 2013 21:03,
Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > I think the most
up to date installation guide is
>> the
>> > > > > README
>> > > > > > > >>> file -
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > https://github.com/apache/wave/blob/trunk/README
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > On Mon, Dec 2,
2013 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Wrobel <
>> > > > > > > >>> darkflame@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > Stuck #3:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > "ANT"
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > Buildfile:
C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > check-test-dependencies:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > BUILD FAILED
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:259:
You need to
>> > > execute
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > get-third-party
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > targ
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > et to download
dependencies required for tests
>> > > > > compilation,
>> > > > > > > >>> i.e.
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> ant
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > get-third-p
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > arty. third_party/test/emma/emma_ant.jar
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > ~~~
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > Thomas &
Bertines online review show:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > Try it! You
might even feel ambivalent about it
>> :)
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > On 2 December
2013 15:13, Thomas Wrobel <
>> > > > > > darkflame@gmail.com
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> wrote:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >  Note
#2:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > Should
be made clear your need JDK installed,
>> > with
>> > > a
>> > > > > link
>> > > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > >>> the
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> Java
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > site.
(not just JRE).
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > Note
#3:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > Should
be clarified that the ANT command
>> doesn't
>> > > work
>> > > > > in
>> > > > > > XP
>> > > > > > > >>> just
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> by
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > adding
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > its path
to a "ANT" system variable.
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > The path
to ANT has to be added to the already
>> > > > existing
>> > > > > > > PATH
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> system
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > variable.
(and it should be just to the "bin"
>> > > > > directory,
>> > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> \ant at
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > the
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > end shouldn't
be there.
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > People
can use "echo %PATH%" to check its
>> added
>> > ok.
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > (I will
start expanding/changing the guide as
>> > soon
>> > > > as I
>> > > > > > > have
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> write
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > permission,
although I will post changes first
>> > here
>> > > > as
>> > > > > > > well,
>> > > > > > > >>> in
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> case
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > I
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > have
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > got something
wrong or its specific to XP and
>> > Win7
>> > > is
>> > > > > > > treated
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > differently)
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > ~~~
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > Thomas
& Bertines online review show:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > Try it!
You might even feel ambivalent about
>> it
>> > :)
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > > On 2
December 2013 02:36, Ali Lown <
>> > ali@lown.me.uk
>> > > >
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >> >
For the ant, do I just go for the route
>> (that
>> > is
>> > > > the
>> > > > > > > >>> "wave"
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > directory
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >> >
rather then the  "wave-protocol" one that
>> > > doesn't
>> > > > > > exist
>> > > > > > > >>> now?
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >> Yes.
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> > >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>> >
>> > > > > > > >>> >>>
>> > > > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > > > >>> >>
>> > > > > > > >>> >
>> > > > > > > >>>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message