incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Setting up Wave for client development (my experience setting up on WindowsXP)
Date Wed, 04 Dec 2013 19:24:01 GMT
"BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 312 minutes 41 seconds"

Ok, after giving Oracle my "totally real" address and "totally real" phone
number I got JDK6 and now Ant is building just fine.
After 5-6 hours its done.
(hours? is that normal? my machines not that great but still...)

Suggestion;
Would it be possible to have a virtual machine with everything set up
already? or is there technical/license reasons for that to be unsuitable?

Query:
Can Wave be updated to JDK7? is there big issues holding it back ? Or is
there more open alternatives we can use instead - one that doesn't require
handing over personal details to a company?

--
If we want to get more people into Wave development, at my experience here
is the norm, then these might be significant issues. Possibly more-so then
Apache vs Git.

Regardless, I'll continue my experiences trying to get started. ho hum.





~~~
Thomas & Bertines online review show:
http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)


On 2 December 2013 23:25, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:

> bah...need to sign up to Oracle just to download JDK6 now? seriously >_<
> This is the sort of thing that puts people off :-/
> *files it under "do tommorow"
>
> ~~~
> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>
>
> On 2 December 2013 22:10, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ah...no...a fresh download of jdk7
>> I'll downgrade.
>>
>> ~~~
>> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
>> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
>> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>>
>>
>> On 2 December 2013 21:39, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Are you definitely using jdk6?
>>> On 2 Dec 2013 20:25, "Thomas Wrobel" <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Thanks - I'll use that one as a reference now, but I'll aim to
>>> edit/update
>>> > the other one (as that seems a bit more "friendly" for someone getting
>>> > started).
>>> > ---
>>> > Notes #4:
>>> > ant get-third-party is needed before running ant.
>>> > --- Stuck #4:
>>> > Build error;
>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave>ant Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml
>>> > check-test-dependencies: init-logging: [mkdir] Created dir:
>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\logs [echo] Logging to
>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave/build/logs/build_2013-11-29_17-48-35 .log init:
>>> > [mkdir] Created dir: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto [mkdir] Created
>>> dir:
>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\messages [mkdir] Created dir:
>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\src [mkdir] Created dir:
>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\test [mkdir] Created dir:
>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\coverage [mkdir] Created dir:
>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\dist [mkdir] Created dir:
>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\staging [mkdir] Created dir:
>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\dep [mkdir] Created dir:
>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\test_out compile-proto-dep: compile-proto: [javac]
>>> > Compiling 12 source files to C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto [javac]
>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\attachment\Attac
>>> > hmentProto.java:344: warning: [static] static method should be
>>> qualified by
>>> > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac]
>>> > super.addAll(values, result.attachment_); [javac] ^ [javac] error:
>>> warnings
>>> > found and -Werror specified [javac]
>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\common\comms\Wav
>>> > eClientRpc.java:990: warning: [static] static method should be
>>> qualified by
>>> > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac]
>>> > super.addAll(values, result.waveletIdPrefix_); [javac] ^
>>> > ...(and a lot of similiar warnings ending in a ...
>>> >
>>> >     [javac]         super.addAll(values, result.removedContributor_);
>>> >     [javac]              ^
>>> >     [javac] 1 error
>>> >     [javac] 40 warnings
>>> >
>>> > BUILD FAILED
>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:100: The following error occurred while
>>> > executing
>>> >  this line:
>>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build-macros.xml:68: Compile failed; see the
>>> compiler
>>> > error
>>> >  output for details.
>>> >
>>> > Total time: 12 seconds
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ~~~
>>> > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
>>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
>>> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 2 December 2013 21:03, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > I think the most up to date installation guide is the README file -
>>> > > https://github.com/apache/wave/blob/trunk/README
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Stuck #3:
>>> > > > "ANT"
>>> > > > Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml
>>> > > >
>>> > > > check-test-dependencies:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > BUILD FAILED
>>> > > > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:259: You need to execute the
>>> > > get-third-party
>>> > > > targ
>>> > > > et to download dependencies required for tests compilation, i.e.
>>> ant
>>> > > > get-third-p
>>> > > > arty. third_party/test/emma/emma_ant.jar
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > ~~~
>>> > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
>>> > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
>>> > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On 2 December 2013 15:13, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > >  Note #2:
>>> > > > > Should be made clear your need JDK installed, with a link
to the
>>> Java
>>> > > > > site. (not just JRE).
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Note #3:
>>> > > > > Should be clarified that the ANT command doesn't work in
XP just
>>> by
>>> > > > adding
>>> > > > > its path to a "ANT" system variable.
>>> > > > > The path to ANT has to be added to the already existing PATH
>>> system
>>> > > > > variable. (and it should be just to the "bin" directory,
the
>>> \ant at
>>> > > the
>>> > > > > end shouldn't be there.
>>> > > > > People can use "echo %PATH%" to check its added ok.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > (I will start expanding/changing the guide as soon as I have
>>> write
>>> > > > > permission, although I will post changes first here as well,
in
>>> case
>>> > I
>>> > > > have
>>> > > > > got something wrong or its specific to XP and Win7 is treated
>>> > > > differently)
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > ~~~
>>> > > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
>>> > > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
>>> > > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On 2 December 2013 02:36, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >> > For the ant, do I just go for the route (that is
the "wave"
>>> > > directory
>>> > > > >> > rather then the  "wave-protocol" one that doesn't
exist now?
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >> Yes.
>>> > > > >>
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message