incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Setting up Wave for client development (my experience setting up on WindowsXP)
Date Wed, 04 Dec 2013 21:55:07 GMT
ah...ok.
If someone could give me editing ability's over that getting started guide
then. Doesn't sound like I could make it worse at this point ;)

~~~
Thomas & Bertines online review show:
http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)


On 4 December 2013 22:40, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:

> The client console does not exist anymore.
> It was removed the code base (at least) two years ago.
>
> Ali
>
> On 4 December 2013 21:38, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Ok, just checking the output of the build.
> >
> > I have a "dist" folder with:
> >
> > pst.jar
> > wave-in-a-box-server-0.4-incubating.jar
> > wave-in-a-box-export-import-0.4-incubating.jar
> >
> > The old guide (
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Building+Wave+in+a+Box#
> )
> > makes reference to
> >
> > waveinabox-client-console-0.3.jar
> > waveinabox-server-0.3.jar
> >
> > in a "wave-protocol" directory. Neither the directory or those files
> exist.
> > I assume  "waveinabox-server-0.3.jar" is now called
> >  "wave-in-a-box-server-0.4-incubating.jar"
> > But is "waveinabox-client-console-0.3.jar" now
> >  "wave-in-a-box-export-import-0.4-incubating.jar" ?
> >
> >
> > ~~~
> > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> >
> >
> > On 4 December 2013 21:50, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Might be worth at some point looking into alternatives for
> multi-language
> >> support?
> >> Should be possible without multiplying compile times.
> >> I'll have to look into it once I am up and running.
> >>
> >> ~~~
> >> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> >> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> >> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> >>
> >>
> >> On 4 December 2013 21:33, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Permutation is not only per browser, it is also per language and I
> think
> >>> WIAB supports 4 languages.
> >>> Anyway, it is very strange it took 4 hours, probably 2 GB is too
> little,
> >>> you ll need about 4 GB.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > 32??? There isnt 32 different browser engines is there :?
> >>> > My own GWT projects, (using 2.5.1) use 7 at most. (and even that
> should
> >>> go
> >>> > down in newer versions as Opera phase's out Presto.)
> >>> >
> >>> > It wasn't GWT permutations taking the bulk of the time  anyway, mind
> >>> you -
> >>> > it seemed to mostly be the testing and (strangely) expanding JAR
> files.
> >>> > That was just my perception though. Certainly before it got to
> >>> > "compile-gwt:" took at least 4 hours.
> >>> > Would the log help here?
> >>> >
> >>> > My machine is a 4200 dual core Amd. Not much ram (2GB), was running
> >>> chrome
> >>> > at the same time, but not doing anything intensive. I wouldn't be
> >>> surprised
> >>> > if my machine is to blame here, but I cant think why it would be this
> >>> > different.
> >>> > ---
> >>> > Anyway, dinner now, then back to poking at things.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > ~~~
> >>> > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> >>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> >>> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On 4 December 2013 20:59, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > We have 32 GWT permutations the moment, we used to have only 4...
> Some
> >>> > last
> >>> > > changes caused this increase... We need to be more cautious about
> >>> > updating
> >>> > > GWT client code.
> >>> > > I tried
> >>> > > ant clean dist-server compile-gwt test
> >>> > > It took me about 16 minutes. If you tried the default target which
> >>> also
> >>> > > includes running tests then it could take about 6 minutes more.
> >>> > > So max 21 minutes on 2-core laptop. This is for the full prod
> build,
> >>> if
> >>> > you
> >>> > > run the server from compiled source with dev GWT setting(only
2
> >>> > > permutations) then it takes only a few minutes, or even less.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Basically running wave is simple like:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > git clone git://git.apache.org/wave.git wave
> >>> > > cd wave
> >>> > > cp server.config.example server.config
> >>> > > ant dist-server compile-gwt run-server
> >>> > > Open the browser at http://localhost:9898
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > > "BUILD SUCCESSFUL
> >>> > > > > Total time: 312 minutes 41 seconds"
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Err.. it takes ~5 minutes on my dev machine! Is this a single
> core
> >>> vm,
> >>> > > > doing lots of swapping, and with shared io?
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > > Suggestion;
> >>> > > > > Would it be possible to have a virtual machine with
everything
> >>> set up
> >>> > > > > already? or is there technical/license reasons for that
to be
> >>> > > unsuitable?
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > I suspect this would be difficult. (And you don't really
want to
> be
> >>> in
> >>> > a
> >>> > > > VM).
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > > Query:
> >>> > > > > Can Wave be updated to JDK7? is there big issues holding
it
> back
> >>> ? Or
> >>> > > is
> >>> > > > > there more open alternatives we can use instead - one
that
> doesn't
> >>> > > > require
> >>> > > > > handing over personal details to a company?
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > (OpenJDK 1.6 works fine, so...)
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > This is quite difficult to do for the codebase. You would
also
> need
> >>> to
> >>> > > > upgrade all the third-party components.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Please continue to provide feedback.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Thanks.
> >>> > > > Ali
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message