incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Frank R." <renfeng...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Setting up Wave for client development (my experience setting up on WindowsXP)
Date Thu, 05 Dec 2013 14:05:19 GMT
>
> *Told it it was a gwt project (not 100% sure thats correct, as only part of
> its gwt...seems to work though)

Don't do that. I don't think it's a standard GWT project in the SDK point
of view. That's why you got the two errors.

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:

> Note#:
> *Imported as existing project into eclipse.
> *Told it it was a gwt project (not 100% sure thats correct, as only part of
> its gwt...seems to work though)
> *2 errors;
> -The GWT SDK JAR gwt-servlet.jar is missing in the WEB-INF/lib directory
> -The web.xml file does not exist WEB-INF /wave/war
> However, I assume these can be ignored as we arnt using gwt for any of the
> server stuff are we?
> *2404 warnings...but thats normal for a project of this size ;)
>
>
> ~~~
> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>
>
> On 5 December 2013 12:57, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > oh, it already has Eclipse stuff. *smacks head* thought that had to be
> > built separately first before it would be ready.
> > Thanks.
> >
> > regarding compile times; I'll see how fast the GWT stuff compiles on its
> > own, as mentioned earlier I think the majority of my 5 hour build was for
> > the server stuff, not the client.
> > If the problem is somehow specific to me - either due to my XP, or the
> > 2Gig or ram, or something else about my system, then its not worth
> worrying
> > much.
> > If the problem is likely to effect others though, we should look into it,
> > either a fix, or the virtual machine as an option.
> > The quicker people can dive into the code, the less likely they are to
> > lose their enthusiasm before they even start ;)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ~~~
> > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> >
> >
> > On 5 December 2013 10:23, Frank R. <renfeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> If you get the source code from https://github.com/apache/wave, I'd
> >> suggest to import Wave in a Box directly as an existing Eclipse project.
> >> [image: Inline image 1]
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> Is there a command for serverstuff+gwt-dev ? As I think that would be
> >>> useful to recommend in the guide, rather then the full serverstuff+32
> >>> permutations.  (yet you don't just want "compile-gwt-dev" either, as I
> >>> assume that's without ant server stuff).
> >>> --
> >>> Stuck#4:
> >>> How do I currently get it setup for Eclipse?
> >>>
> >>> The old guide says;
> >>>
> >>> ant eclipse
> >>>
> >>> Will give me the project files needed, but this gives me an error;
> >>>
> >>> C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:79: Execute failed: java.io.IOException:
> >>> Cannot r
> >>> un program "tools\eclipse.sh": CreateProcess error=193, %1 is not a
> valid
> >>> Win32
> >>> application
> >>>         at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:470)
> >>>         at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Runtime.java:593)
> >>>         at
> >>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute$Java13CommandLauncher.exec(Exec
> >>> ute.java:827)
> >>>         at
> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute.launch(Execute.java:445)
> >>>         at
> >>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Execute.execute(Execute.java:459)
> >>>         at
> >>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTask.runExecute(ExecTask.java:635)
> >>>         at
> >>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTask.runExec(ExecTask.java:676)
> >>>         at
> >>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.ExecTask.execute(ExecTask.java:502)
> >>>         at
> >>> org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:291)
> >>>         at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor4.invoke(Unknown Source)
> >>>         at
> >>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAcces
> >>> sorImpl.java:25)
> >>>         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> >>>         at
> >>> org.apache.tools.ant.dispatch.DispatchUtils.execute(DispatchUtils.jav
> >>> a:106)
> >>>         at org.apache.tools.ant.Task.perform(Task.java:348)
> >>>         at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.execute(Target.java:390)
> >>>         at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.performTasks(Target.java:411)
> >>>         at
> >>> org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeSortedTargets(Project.java:1360)
> >>>         at
> org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTarget(Project.java:1329)
> >>>         at
> >>> org.apache.tools.ant.helper.DefaultExecutor.executeTargets(DefaultExe
> >>> cutor.java:41)
> >>>         at
> org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTargets(Project.java:1212)
> >>>         at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.runBuild(Main.java:801)
> >>>         at org.apache.tools.ant.Main.startAnt(Main.java:218)
> >>>         at org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher.run(Launcher.java:280)
> >>>         at org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:109)
> >>> Caused by: java.io.IOException: CreateProcess error=193, %1 is not a
> >>> valid
> >>> Win32
> >>>  application
> >>>         at java.lang.ProcessImpl.create(Native Method)
> >>>         at java.lang.ProcessImpl.<init>(ProcessImpl.java:177)
> >>>         at java.lang.ProcessImpl.start(ProcessImpl.java:28)
> >>>         at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:452)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ~~~
> >>> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> >>> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> >>> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 5 December 2013 00:44, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > We do.
> >>> >
> >>> > 'Ant compile-gwt-dev' does exactly that.
> >>> > On 4 Dec 2013 23:26, "Thomas Wrobel" <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Thanks for the explanation/breakdown that's useful.
> >>> > > I'll still look into it, but it sounds like far too many to use
a
> >>> > > dictionary. You'd end up with quite a mess.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Maybe just having a "development compile" without all the
> >>> permutations
> >>> > > would be better for now. I'll have a think though if decent
> >>> alternatives
> >>> > > come to mind.
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > ~~~
> >>> > > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> >>> > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> >>> > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On 5 December 2013 00:07, Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado <
> >>> vjrj@ourproject.org
> >>> > > >wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > El 04/12/13 23:55, Ali Lown escribió:
> >>> > > > > It looks for all the files to do with the spanish translation.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > yes, I did for the two languages (with same result) ... but
I
> copy
> >>> my
> >>> > > > last one command (the Spanish) :-P
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message