incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Frank R." <renfeng...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Setting up Wave for client development (my experience setting up on WindowsXP)
Date Thu, 05 Dec 2013 07:59:07 GMT
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:

> "BUILD SUCCESSFUL
> Total time: 312 minutes 41 seconds"
>
> Ok, after giving Oracle my "totally real" address and "totally real" phone
> number I got JDK6 and now Ant is building just fine.
> After 5-6 hours its done.
> (hours? is that normal? my machines not that great but still...)
>
What is the configuration of your PC?

It took me 3 minutes 26 seconds to compile gwt. You can read more details
in a log for how I explored the build process on Linux Mint 13 - Making of
Start your own Wave in a Box - Google
Drive<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uFzLD6gyY-L5egbztn9FFJjoyWvf3uO3AYnJoSMiTis/edit#>.
And the slides, Start your own Wave in a Box - Google
Drive<https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1k2KqC_h0cU_7Xpgfya8W2B2REkxb_YsQQWL5zBGE-ac/pub?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000>.
Hope that will help.
     [java]    Compile of permutations succeeded
     [java] Linking into /tmp/wave/war/webclient
     [java]    Link succeeded
     [java]    Compilation succeeded -- 204.776s
    [touch] Creating /tmp/wave/build/dep/compile-gwt

BUILD SUCCESSFUL
Total time: 3 minutes 26 seconds


>
> Suggestion;
> Would it be possible to have a virtual machine with everything set up
> already? or is there technical/license reasons for that to be unsuitable?
>
I can do that by creating a virtual box image, and exporting it as OVA file
- Open Virtualization Archive, the single-file version of an Open
Virtualization Format<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Virtualization_Format>image.
It'll resemble my Linux Mint box.


> Query:
> Can Wave be updated to JDK7? is there big issues holding it back ? Or is
> there more open alternatives we can use instead - one that doesn't require
> handing over personal details to a company?

You can have JDK7 to compile and run Wave in a Box. I guess the trick
should be that compiler compliance level must be 1.6. I used to be troubled
by the problem occasionally. I need to verify that.

Now, I have both 7 and 6 on my Windows 7 box.
[image: Inline image 1]

I have the runtime as Java 6. I don't know how I get such settings after
upgrading JRE and JDK several times, and removing obsolete versions.
[image: Inline image 2]

However, my Ant is running on Java 7. I can have a clean-and-release build.
[image: Inline image 3]

When I have Wave in a Box loaded in Eclipse, I have to make sure the
compiler compliance level to be 1.6.
[image: Inline image 5]

Or else, I'll have a bunch of compile errors.
[image: Inline image 4]




> --
> If we want to get more people into Wave development, at my experience here
> is the norm, then these might be significant issues. Possibly more-so then
> Apache vs Git.
>
> Regardless, I'll continue my experiences trying to get started. ho hum.
>
>
>
>
>
> ~~~
> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>
>
> On 2 December 2013 23:25, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > bah...need to sign up to Oracle just to download JDK6 now? seriously >_<
> > This is the sort of thing that puts people off :-/
> > *files it under "do tommorow"
> >
> > ~~~
> > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> >
> >
> > On 2 December 2013 22:10, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> ah...no...a fresh download of jdk7
> >> I'll downgrade.
> >>
> >> ~~~
> >> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> >> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> >> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2 December 2013 21:39, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Are you definitely using jdk6?
> >>> On 2 Dec 2013 20:25, "Thomas Wrobel" <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Thanks - I'll use that one as a reference now, but I'll aim to
> >>> edit/update
> >>> > the other one (as that seems a bit more "friendly" for someone
> getting
> >>> > started).
> >>> > ---
> >>> > Notes #4:
> >>> > ant get-third-party is needed before running ant.
> >>> > --- Stuck #4:
> >>> > Build error;
> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave>ant Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml
> >>> > check-test-dependencies: init-logging: [mkdir] Created dir:
> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\logs [echo] Logging to
> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave/build/logs/build_2013-11-29_17-48-35 .log init:
> >>> > [mkdir] Created dir: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto [mkdir] Created
> >>> dir:
> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\messages [mkdir] Created dir:
> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\src [mkdir] Created dir:
> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\test [mkdir] Created dir:
> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\coverage [mkdir] Created dir:
> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\dist [mkdir] Created dir:
> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\staging [mkdir] Created dir:
> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\dep [mkdir] Created dir:
> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\test_out compile-proto-dep: compile-proto:
> [javac]
> >>> > Compiling 12 source files to C:\TomsProjects\wave\build\proto [javac]
> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\attachment\Attac
> >>> > hmentProto.java:344: warning: [static] static method should be
> >>> qualified by
> >>> > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac]
> >>> > super.addAll(values, result.attachment_); [javac] ^ [javac] error:
> >>> warnings
> >>> > found and -Werror specified [javac]
> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\proto_src\org\waveprotocol\box\common\comms\Wav
> >>> > eClientRpc.java:990: warning: [static] static method should be
> >>> qualified by
> >>> > type name, Builder, instead of by an expression [javac]
> >>> > super.addAll(values, result.waveletIdPrefix_); [javac] ^
> >>> > ...(and a lot of similiar warnings ending in a ...
> >>> >
> >>> >     [javac]         super.addAll(values, result.removedContributor_);
> >>> >     [javac]              ^
> >>> >     [javac] 1 error
> >>> >     [javac] 40 warnings
> >>> >
> >>> > BUILD FAILED
> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:100: The following error occurred
> while
> >>> > executing
> >>> >  this line:
> >>> > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build-macros.xml:68: Compile failed; see the
> >>> compiler
> >>> > error
> >>> >  output for details.
> >>> >
> >>> > Total time: 12 seconds
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > ~~~
> >>> > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> >>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> >>> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On 2 December 2013 21:03, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > I think the most up to date installation guide is the README file
-
> >>> > > https://github.com/apache/wave/blob/trunk/README
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com
> >
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > Stuck #3:
> >>> > > > "ANT"
> >>> > > > Buildfile: C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > check-test-dependencies:
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > BUILD FAILED
> >>> > > > C:\TomsProjects\wave\build.xml:259: You need to execute the
> >>> > > get-third-party
> >>> > > > targ
> >>> > > > et to download dependencies required for tests compilation,
i.e.
> >>> ant
> >>> > > > get-third-p
> >>> > > > arty. third_party/test/emma/emma_ant.jar
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > ~~~
> >>> > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> >>> > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> >>> > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > On 2 December 2013 15:13, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > >  Note #2:
> >>> > > > > Should be made clear your need JDK installed, with a
link to
> the
> >>> Java
> >>> > > > > site. (not just JRE).
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > Note #3:
> >>> > > > > Should be clarified that the ANT command doesn't work
in XP
> just
> >>> by
> >>> > > > adding
> >>> > > > > its path to a "ANT" system variable.
> >>> > > > > The path to ANT has to be added to the already existing
PATH
> >>> system
> >>> > > > > variable. (and it should be just to the "bin" directory,
the
> >>> \ant at
> >>> > > the
> >>> > > > > end shouldn't be there.
> >>> > > > > People can use "echo %PATH%" to check its added ok.
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > (I will start expanding/changing the guide as soon as
I have
> >>> write
> >>> > > > > permission, although I will post changes first here
as well, in
> >>> case
> >>> > I
> >>> > > > have
> >>> > > > > got something wrong or its specific to XP and Win7 is
treated
> >>> > > > differently)
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > ~~~
> >>> > > > > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> >>> > > > > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> >>> > > > > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > > On 2 December 2013 02:36, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
wrote:
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > >> > For the ant, do I just go for the route (that
is the "wave"
> >>> > > directory
> >>> > > > >> > rather then the  "wave-protocol" one that doesn't
exist now?
> >>> > > > >>
> >>> > > > >> Yes.
> >>> > > > >>
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/related (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message