incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Frank R." <renfeng...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Setting up Wave for client development (my experience setting up on WindowsXP)
Date Thu, 05 Dec 2013 08:40:57 GMT
>
> wave-in-a-box-export-import-0.4-incubating.jar

It's for run-export.sh and run-import.sh

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok, just checking the output of the build.
>
> I have a "dist" folder with:
>
> pst.jar
> wave-in-a-box-server-0.4-incubating.jar
> wave-in-a-box-export-import-0.4-incubating.jar
>
> The old guide (
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Building+Wave+in+a+Box#)
> makes reference to
>
> waveinabox-client-console-0.3.jar
> waveinabox-server-0.3.jar
>
> in a "wave-protocol" directory. Neither the directory or those files exist.
> I assume  "waveinabox-server-0.3.jar" is now called
>  "wave-in-a-box-server-0.4-incubating.jar"
> But is "waveinabox-client-console-0.3.jar" now
>  "wave-in-a-box-export-import-0.4-incubating.jar" ?
>
>
> ~~~
> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>
>
> On 4 December 2013 21:50, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Might be worth at some point looking into alternatives for multi-language
> > support?
> > Should be possible without multiplying compile times.
> > I'll have to look into it once I am up and running.
> >
> > ~~~
> > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> >
> >
> > On 4 December 2013 21:33, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Permutation is not only per browser, it is also per language and I think
> >> WIAB supports 4 languages.
> >> Anyway, it is very strange it took 4 hours, probably 2 GB is too little,
> >> you ll need about 4 GB.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > 32??? There isnt 32 different browser engines is there :?
> >> > My own GWT projects, (using 2.5.1) use 7 at most. (and even that
> should
> >> go
> >> > down in newer versions as Opera phase's out Presto.)
> >> >
> >> > It wasn't GWT permutations taking the bulk of the time  anyway, mind
> >> you -
> >> > it seemed to mostly be the testing and (strangely) expanding JAR
> files.
> >> > That was just my perception though. Certainly before it got to
> >> > "compile-gwt:" took at least 4 hours.
> >> > Would the log help here?
> >> >
> >> > My machine is a 4200 dual core Amd. Not much ram (2GB), was running
> >> chrome
> >> > at the same time, but not doing anything intensive. I wouldn't be
> >> surprised
> >> > if my machine is to blame here, but I cant think why it would be this
> >> > different.
> >> > ---
> >> > Anyway, dinner now, then back to poking at things.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ~~~
> >> > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> >> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> >> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 4 December 2013 20:59, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > We have 32 GWT permutations the moment, we used to have only 4...
> Some
> >> > last
> >> > > changes caused this increase... We need to be more cautious about
> >> > updating
> >> > > GWT client code.
> >> > > I tried
> >> > > ant clean dist-server compile-gwt test
> >> > > It took me about 16 minutes. If you tried the default target which
> >> also
> >> > > includes running tests then it could take about 6 minutes more.
> >> > > So max 21 minutes on 2-core laptop. This is for the full prod build,
> >> if
> >> > you
> >> > > run the server from compiled source with dev GWT setting(only 2
> >> > > permutations) then it takes only a few minutes, or even less.
> >> > >
> >> > > Basically running wave is simple like:
> >> > >
> >> > > git clone git://git.apache.org/wave.git wave
> >> > > cd wave
> >> > > cp server.config.example server.config
> >> > > ant dist-server compile-gwt run-server
> >> > > Open the browser at http://localhost:9898
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > > "BUILD SUCCESSFUL
> >> > > > > Total time: 312 minutes 41 seconds"
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Err.. it takes ~5 minutes on my dev machine! Is this a single
core
> >> vm,
> >> > > > doing lots of swapping, and with shared io?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Suggestion;
> >> > > > > Would it be possible to have a virtual machine with everything
> >> set up
> >> > > > > already? or is there technical/license reasons for that
to be
> >> > > unsuitable?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I suspect this would be difficult. (And you don't really want
to
> be
> >> in
> >> > a
> >> > > > VM).
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Query:
> >> > > > > Can Wave be updated to JDK7? is there big issues holding
it back
> >> ? Or
> >> > > is
> >> > > > > there more open alternatives we can use instead - one that
> doesn't
> >> > > > require
> >> > > > > handing over personal details to a company?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > (OpenJDK 1.6 works fine, so...)
> >> > > >
> >> > > > This is quite difficult to do for the codebase. You would also
> need
> >> to
> >> > > > upgrade all the third-party components.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Please continue to provide feedback.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Thanks.
> >> > > > Ali
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message