incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ali Lown <...@lown.me.uk>
Subject Re: Setting up Wave for client development (my experience setting up on WindowsXP)
Date Wed, 04 Dec 2013 21:40:13 GMT
The client console does not exist anymore.
It was removed the code base (at least) two years ago.

Ali

On 4 December 2013 21:38, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, just checking the output of the build.
>
> I have a "dist" folder with:
>
> pst.jar
> wave-in-a-box-server-0.4-incubating.jar
> wave-in-a-box-export-import-0.4-incubating.jar
>
> The old guide (
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Building+Wave+in+a+Box#)
> makes reference to
>
> waveinabox-client-console-0.3.jar
> waveinabox-server-0.3.jar
>
> in a "wave-protocol" directory. Neither the directory or those files exist.
> I assume  "waveinabox-server-0.3.jar" is now called
>  "wave-in-a-box-server-0.4-incubating.jar"
> But is "waveinabox-client-console-0.3.jar" now
>  "wave-in-a-box-export-import-0.4-incubating.jar" ?
>
>
> ~~~
> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>
>
> On 4 December 2013 21:50, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Might be worth at some point looking into alternatives for multi-language
>> support?
>> Should be possible without multiplying compile times.
>> I'll have to look into it once I am up and running.
>>
>> ~~~
>> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
>> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
>> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>>
>>
>> On 4 December 2013 21:33, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Permutation is not only per browser, it is also per language and I think
>>> WIAB supports 4 languages.
>>> Anyway, it is very strange it took 4 hours, probably 2 GB is too little,
>>> you ll need about 4 GB.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkflame@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > 32??? There isnt 32 different browser engines is there :?
>>> > My own GWT projects, (using 2.5.1) use 7 at most. (and even that should
>>> go
>>> > down in newer versions as Opera phase's out Presto.)
>>> >
>>> > It wasn't GWT permutations taking the bulk of the time  anyway, mind
>>> you -
>>> > it seemed to mostly be the testing and (strangely) expanding JAR files.
>>> > That was just my perception though. Certainly before it got to
>>> > "compile-gwt:" took at least 4 hours.
>>> > Would the log help here?
>>> >
>>> > My machine is a 4200 dual core Amd. Not much ram (2GB), was running
>>> chrome
>>> > at the same time, but not doing anything intensive. I wouldn't be
>>> surprised
>>> > if my machine is to blame here, but I cant think why it would be this
>>> > different.
>>> > ---
>>> > Anyway, dinner now, then back to poking at things.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ~~~
>>> > Thomas & Bertines online review show:
>>> > http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
>>> > Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 4 December 2013 20:59, Yuri Z <vega113@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > We have 32 GWT permutations the moment, we used to have only 4... Some
>>> > last
>>> > > changes caused this increase... We need to be more cautious about
>>> > updating
>>> > > GWT client code.
>>> > > I tried
>>> > > ant clean dist-server compile-gwt test
>>> > > It took me about 16 minutes. If you tried the default target which
>>> also
>>> > > includes running tests then it could take about 6 minutes more.
>>> > > So max 21 minutes on 2-core laptop. This is for the full prod build,
>>> if
>>> > you
>>> > > run the server from compiled source with dev GWT setting(only 2
>>> > > permutations) then it takes only a few minutes, or even less.
>>> > >
>>> > > Basically running wave is simple like:
>>> > >
>>> > > git clone git://git.apache.org/wave.git wave
>>> > > cd wave
>>> > > cp server.config.example server.config
>>> > > ant dist-server compile-gwt run-server
>>> > > Open the browser at http://localhost:9898
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > > "BUILD SUCCESSFUL
>>> > > > > Total time: 312 minutes 41 seconds"
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Err.. it takes ~5 minutes on my dev machine! Is this a single
core
>>> vm,
>>> > > > doing lots of swapping, and with shared io?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Suggestion;
>>> > > > > Would it be possible to have a virtual machine with everything
>>> set up
>>> > > > > already? or is there technical/license reasons for that to
be
>>> > > unsuitable?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I suspect this would be difficult. (And you don't really want
to be
>>> in
>>> > a
>>> > > > VM).
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Query:
>>> > > > > Can Wave be updated to JDK7? is there big issues holding
it back
>>> ? Or
>>> > > is
>>> > > > > there more open alternatives we can use instead - one that
doesn't
>>> > > > require
>>> > > > > handing over personal details to a company?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > (OpenJDK 1.6 works fine, so...)
>>> > > >
>>> > > > This is quite difficult to do for the codebase. You would also
need
>>> to
>>> > > > upgrade all the third-party components.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Please continue to provide feedback.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thanks.
>>> > > > Ali
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>

Mime
View raw message