incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro <zmy...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Wave Extensions Gallery integration
Date Thu, 18 Jul 2013 02:29:38 GMT
One of my biggest worries regarding giving the WEG to Apache is I want
other wave providers (e.g. Rizzoma) to see the WEG as unbiased, and having
the same organization own the WEG and WIAB would not really help that image.

—Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro
On Jul 17, 2013 9:19 AM, "Ali Lown" <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:

> So... What do we want to do about this?
>
> The code to implement this in Wave is sitting in my repo
> (https://github.com/alown/wave/releases/tag/waveextensionsgallery),
> and can be put in for tidying and review at any point.
>
> I think it is worth doing, but I don't feel it is 'correct' to put it
> in as the default extensions source whilst WEG is hosted at/by a
> third-party.
>
> If WEG was donated to Apache (This was discussed in a hypothetical
> form), then I don't see a problem with using it.
>
> Ali
>
> On 1 May 2013 20:41, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> >> - The current gadget data includes primary and secondary categories.
> >>> Can you make this information available over the api? (Assuming you
> >>> have it?)
> >> The gallery does not currently allow secondary categories.  Do you think
> >> that would be worth adding?
> >
> > I was merely raising it as a possible point. Though we don't make use
> > of it currently in the UI, so I don't think it is very important
> > concept.
> >
> >>> - Adding any of the gadgets currently results in a 'Port error: Could
> >>> not establish connection. Receiving end does not exist.' message from
> >>> Chrome 27, but seems to work fine in Firefox 19.0.2.
> >> What do you mean when you say “adding...gadgets”?  Are the gadget URLs
> from
> >> the gallery invalid?
> >
> > This was a more general point, and not directly related to you/your
> > code (rather at any of the other maintainers reading this thread, to
> > point out that gadgets appear to be fairly broken at the moment. [When
> > also considering WAVE-389].)
> >
> > Ali
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message