incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Upayavira ...@odoko.co.uk>
Subject Re: Frequent turbulence bugs resolved with updated client server protocol patch
Date Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:18:38 GMT


On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Thomas Wrobel wrote:
> >> 2. Only servers that are satisfy the following conditions will be
> >> considered legitimate:
> >> a) WIAB based
> >> b) Free to use
> >> c) Actively contribute back to Apache Wave.
> >>
> >> I think such a solution will allow to grow the Apache Wave community and
> >> provide information about third party WIAB based servers that take part
> >> in
> >> WIAB development.
> >>
> >> What you think?
> 
> Shouldn't compatibility be a requirement too?
> That is, not only server<>server but server<>client.
> Or, at least, a commitment to conform to the WIAB reference as it
> develops its protocols.

In the end, truthfulness is what matters. We could have a section
listing servers that are *not* compatible with WIAB. Wouldn't reflect
very well on those servers though, I'd say, so could provide an
incentive to improve compatibility.

> (of course, in this specific case wiab.pro passes with ease as its
> contributing protocol improvements back)

Which is a good thing!

Upayavira

Mime
View raw message