incubator-wave-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael MacFadden <michael.macfad...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Review Request: Removes requestreview
Date Tue, 04 Jun 2013 02:42:25 GMT
I understand now.  If you look here:

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wave/

You can see that the site has its own repo.  We could easily make a repo
call whitepapers or something to that effect, which would contain the source
and build files.  We can then built them and post them to the site
somewhere.  We can figure out the details.  For now, since they are on the
wave-protocol site, I would simply remove them from out main source repo.

~Michael

From:  Angus Turner <angusisfree@gmail.com>
Date:  Monday, June 3, 2013 7:31 PM
To:  Michael MacFadden <michael.macfadden@gmail.com>
Cc:  Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
Subject:  Re: Review Request: Removes requestreview

I was going to leave the protocol and whitepaper stuff on the wave-protocol
site, as they are formatted nicely there and that really is protocol stuff
that should be separate from WIAB. I was going to suggest a github repo to
keep the make files for this seperate from WIAB once again.

I don't have any preferences, just I think that those files should be
located outside of the release repo. There is also another folder which is
docs/ which contains the images for the various tutorials which are now
located on the wiki, not sure what we wanted to do with that either.

Thanks
Angus Turner
angusisfree@gmail.com


On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Michael MacFadden
<michael.macfadden@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am following this. My on question was the part about a git hub repo. What
> was that for.
> 
> My opinion would be, let's just move everything over to the wave site. Once it
> is all there, then I will take down the wave protocol stuff. I would rather
> have it duplicated until we are happy with the new site.
> 
> ~Michael
> 
> On Jun 3, 2013, at 3:43 PM, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> 
>> > Michael,
>> >
>> > I believe you are the one in control of the wave-protocol site currently.
>> >
>> > Comments on this?
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> > Ali
>> >
>> > On 3 June 2013 23:41, Angus Turner <angusisfree@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Note I'd be willing to set all this up if someone can give me write
>>> access
>>> >> to the wave-protocol site...
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks
>>> >> Angus Turner
>>> >> angusisfree@gmail.com
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Angus Turner <angusisfree@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> In moving over all the stuff to the wiki I left the protocol
specs and
the
>>>> >>> whitepapers on the protocol website. Maybe we need someone with
commit
>>>> >>> access to that site to leave all the protocol stuff up and delete
the
>>>> rest,
>>>> >>> and create a github repo or something to host the build files.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Thanks
>>>> >>> Angus Turner
>>>> >>> angusisfree@gmail.com
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Ali Lown <ali@lown.me.uk>
wrote:
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> Yes, we can move spec/ and whitepapers/ to the website
if that is
>>>>> better.
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> You might want to consider how they sat on the waveprotocol
site
>>>>> >>>> (along with some other documents not included in spec/whitepapers):
>>>>> >>>> http://www.waveprotocol.org/protocol.
>>>>> >>>> (And whether we should have those other documents on
the site as
>>>>> well?)
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> Ali
>>>>> >>>>
>>>>> >>>> On 3 June 2013 23:29, Angus Turner <angusisfree@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>> Wasn't sure if I was going to include removing
the white paper
>>>>>> folders
>>>>>> >>>>> yet. Just a sudden brainwave. Can we include
those folders in the
>>>>>> >>>>> website repo?
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> Sent from my Windows Phone
>>>>>> >>>>> From: Ali Lown
>>>>>> >>>>> Sent: 4/06/2013 7:40 AM
>>>>>> >>>>> To: Angus Turner; Ali Lown; wave
>>>>>> >>>>> Subject: Re: Review Request: Removes requestreview
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> >>>>> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To
reply, visit:
>>>>>> >>>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/11609/#review21362
>>>>>> >>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> Ship it!
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> Thanks for this, though you didn't really need
to file a
>>>>>> >>>>> review-request for since, since I was just going
to do it when I
next
>>>>>> >>>>> went to work on the release.
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> - Ali Lown
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> On June 3, 2013, 9:21 p.m., Angus Turner wrote:
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> >>>>>> This is an automatically generated e-mail.
To reply, visit:
>>>>>>> >>>>>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/11609/
>>>>>>> >>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>> (Updated June 3, 2013, 9:21 p.m.)
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>> Review request for wave.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>> Description
>>>>>>> >>>>>> -------
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>> Removes requestreview as per mailing
list discussion.
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>> Diffs
>>>>>>> >>>>>> -----
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>  /request_codereview 1489182
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11609/diff/
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>> Testing
>>>>>>> >>>>>> -------
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>> n/a
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>> Angus Turner
>>> >>




Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message